Disappointed
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Modular Mustangs > 99-04

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old October 22nd, 2007, 08:51 PM   #1
Regular
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 59
strkrstng2000 is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Disappointed


I got my mustang back. Just to remind everyone to what has been done here is the list:

-302 stroker kit (forged and balanced)
-Patriot stage 3 heads with their cams. The cams are close to comp stage 2 cams.
-Professional Products Intake ported and polished.
-BBk longtubes with magnaflow x pipe no cats.
-Custom chip tuned on a dyno
-BBk 80mm tb
-C&L intake plenum
-30lb injectors
-fender mounted CAI
-new alternator and optima battery

The only restriction I can think of are on the cai the tube is smaller than the mass air meter. The mass air meter sits on a 4" tube and the cai is 3.5". A lot of other cars I see with similar mods are in the 320 to 350 rwhp range. I am at 286 rwhp and 300 tq. That seems low to me. The differences between my car and some of the others with a stroker kit are intake or stage 2 heads from various companies. Can anybody give me any advice as to why I have spent thousands of dollars and have not cracked 300 rwhp?
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old October 22nd, 2007, 08:52 PM   #2
Regular
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 59
strkrstng2000 is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

WTF
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 09:03 PM   #3
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Garhfer's Avatar
 
2004 Mustang GT Conv.
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edgewater, FL
Posts: 1,790
Garhfer is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Garhfer
Default

Because you're going about it all the wrong way, the best way to get the best bang for your buck with these engines are force induction, these motors don't breathe good enough on their own, they need a supercharger, turbo or nitrous for some nice gains... you won't be pleased going the naturally aspirated route.
__________________

2004 GT Boosted by Vortech
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 09:12 PM   #4
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
yojoe600's Avatar
 
2002 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Greensboro , NC
Posts: 1,640
yojoe600 will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

no matter what u have our 2v seem to be always sucking through a straw... that's why u force that damn air down its throat
__________________
Originally Posted by supermachone View Post
it was something like the tinman from the wizard of oz pinching off a tight fart...






Cat Club Co-Founder
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 09:14 PM   #5
Regular
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 59
strkrstng2000 is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I set it up for boost. I had 3 spun bearings and 2 rods knocking so I had to rebuild. I do not plan on stayin NA, twin turbos are in the future. But I have no idea why I am not breaking 300 hp. To be honest it makes me so fucking pissed off I feel kinda sick.
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 09:28 PM   #6
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Garhfer's Avatar
 
2004 Mustang GT Conv.
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edgewater, FL
Posts: 1,790
Garhfer is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Garhfer
Default

Originally Posted by strkrstng2000
I set it up for boost. I had 3 spun bearings and 2 rods knocking so I had to rebuild. I do not plan on stayin NA, twin turbos are in the future. But I have no idea why I am not breaking 300 hp. To be honest it makes me so fucking pissed off I feel kinda sick.
Well all you gotta do now is pop them turbos on and turn up the boost and see some wicked numbers, but then you gotta worry about supporting the frame, and getting the power to the street.
__________________

2004 GT Boosted by Vortech
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 09:31 PM   #7
Regular
 
Badasstang281's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 385
Badasstang281 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to Badasstang281
Default

Are you running high compression?
__________________
BBK cai P&P 75mmtb P&P plenum BASSANI exhaust MAC x-pipe NO CAT"S ACCEL direct fire coils NGK iridium spark plugs lX7 Eibach pro-kit springs
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 09:31 PM   #8
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 444
man_of_war2081 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by strkrstng2000
I set it up for boost. I had 3 spun bearings and 2 rods knocking so I had to rebuild. I do not plan on stayin NA, twin turbos are in the future. But I have no idea why I am not breaking 300 hp. To be honest it makes me so fucking pissed off I feel kinda sick.
If it makes you feel any better, 286 rwhp equals to around 330hp at the crank... so 280+ at the wheels aint bad at all, plus you setup the engine for boost later so dont feel pissed or as if you wasted money cause in reality you didnt, you just prep it for more power than you could have ran through a stock long block.
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 09:41 PM   #9
Regular
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 59
strkrstng2000 is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

The compression is either 9:1 or 9.5:1. My car is also an auto. I believe the internals are rated to 1500 hp I believe. It is an eagle stroker kit. The only bolt on I do not have are udps. I know different dynos give different numbers but, I don't give a shit what kind of dyno I am on I should break 300 rwhp. Other people have full bolt ons with cams and are throwing down 300 plus rwhp. I have p&p intake stage 3 heads plus an extra 21 ci. It does not make sense.
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 09:43 PM   #10
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Garhfer's Avatar
 
2004 Mustang GT Conv.
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edgewater, FL
Posts: 1,790
Garhfer is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Garhfer
Default

Originally Posted by strkrstng2000
The compression is either 9:1 or 9.5:1. My car is also an auto. I believe the internals are rated to 1500 hp I believe. It is an eagle stroker kit. The only bolt on I do not have are udps. I know different dynos give different numbers but, I don't give a shit what kind of dyno I am on I should break 300 rwhp. Other people have full bolt ons with cams and are throwing down 300 plus rwhp. I have p&p intake stage 3 heads plus an extra 21 ci. It does not make sense.
Maybe the place ya took it can't tune for shit?
__________________

2004 GT Boosted by Vortech
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 09:45 PM   #11
mm's nitrous mod
 
SWEET2KSTANG's Avatar
 
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,430
SWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud of
iTrader: 8 reviews
Default

your problem is in the parts. everything you have is for volume of air, not velocity. the build i good, just not for n/a. it will be hard to optimize everything you have without boost. what compression you running? you said you built it for boost so i am guessing 8.5-9.0:1. the p&p intake and stage 3 heads will deliver a great amount of air, but the velocity to get the air into the cylinder is sown. air speed is vital and you are having a lot of air stall.
__________________


project warhorse under construction
being built by MP2 Performance
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 09:49 PM   #12
Regular
 
Badasstang281's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 385
Badasstang281 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to Badasstang281
Default

Where do you live? If you are at a high elevation that will kill you’re hp. I live a mile high from sea level and it is 1 to 1.3 sec slower that at sea level. If you change that to hp that’s like 35 or so.
__________________
BBK cai P&P 75mmtb P&P plenum BASSANI exhaust MAC x-pipe NO CAT"S ACCEL direct fire coils NGK iridium spark plugs lX7 Eibach pro-kit springs
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 09:56 PM   #13
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
WNTS 2RN's Avatar
 
2011 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: US Navy Goat Locker
Posts: 1,545
WNTS 2RN has a spectacular aura aboutWNTS 2RN has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I'm no expert, but I made 300hp with the mods in my sig. I'd look into your ignition or your tune. Maybe your ignition system can't keep up and the motor isn't as efficient as it could be. The other day I destroyed a plug and even though the car ran and ran fine it had no power (or at least a lot less).
__________________

2011 5.0
1.3 gallons of American performance!!
K&N drop in (I know, I'm cheap)
Flowmaster American Thunder exhaust
H&R Super Sport springs
Bremmer BR01 19x8, 19x9.5 wheels
Bottomless bottle of soap!
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 09:57 PM   #14
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlotte NC
Posts: 444
man_of_war2081 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by strkrstng2000
The compression is either 9:1 or 9.5:1. My car is also an auto. I believe the internals are rated to 1500 hp I believe. It is an eagle stroker kit. The only bolt on I do not have are udps. I know different dynos give different numbers but, I don't give a shit what kind of dyno I am on I should break 300 rwhp. Other people have full bolt ons with cams and are throwing down 300 plus rwhp. I have p&p intake stage 3 heads plus an extra 21 ci. It does not make sense.
That Auto trans is your problem, you lose alot more power through is than you would through a manual, if you had a manual im willing to bet you'd be just above 300RWHP
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 10:09 PM   #15
Regular
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 59
strkrstng2000 is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I live near st louis, so altitude is not the problem. The car will stay auto for consistency, although it will get an auto with a higher stall and manual valve body. Sweet2kstang your explination seems right. I wondered if I had oversized the heads for N/A. It seems I have but if that is the problem I can live with it until I get boost. Thanks everyone for your thoughts.
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 11:12 PM   #16
Enthusiast
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 762
TyCouey2000GT is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Either way, I still think he should be well over with that 302, tha heads, cams, intake, exhaust, cai, stock 289's have 235hp,

thats a lil weird to me, If i had to take a guess not knowing you had 286hp I'd think you'd have atleast 350
__________________
Your Average GT
  Reply With Quote
Old October 22nd, 2007, 11:33 PM   #17
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 682
gsjohnson is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by SWEET2KSTANG
your problem is in the parts. everything you have is for volume of air, not velocity. the build i good, just not for n/a. it will be hard to optimize everything you have without boost. what compression you running? you said you built it for boost so i am guessing 8.5-9.0:1. the p&p intake and stage 3 heads will deliver a great amount of air, but the velocity to get the air into the cylinder is sown. air speed is vital and you are having a lot of air stall.
I agree for the most part. I'll bet if you dialed down the injector and T/B sizes you'd get a ton more torque with no horsepower drop. You might even gain a few HPs. What are your fuel pressure readings?

I have lots of simple bolt-on goodies(stock long block) on my car and it runs very well. In preperation for my Procharger, I installed #42 injectors with the Focus fuel pump, and a 75 mm T/B. I also installed the TR6 plugs. I decided I'd drive it for a week and finish the blower install the following weekend. The car couldn't get out of its' own way. My daughter's stock 2000 V6 stangnail would cream it. Needless to say, I parked my stangslug in the garage for the week to avoid any embarrasment.
__________________
2004 Mustang GT

The difference between a girlfriend and wife is about 50 pounds.
  Reply With Quote
Old October 23rd, 2007, 02:24 AM   #18
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: diberville,mississippi
Posts: 1,894
droppedbass87 is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to droppedbass87
Default

dude you could put a procharger at 15psi and have around 500 plus hp..thats a very good setup guys..
__________________
fraziers transmission service..
  Reply With Quote
Old October 23rd, 2007, 03:05 AM   #19
MM Fanatic
 
jivepepper's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Under a sombrero
Posts: 4,556
jivepepper is a jewel in the roughjivepepper is a jewel in the roughjivepepper is a jewel in the roughjivepepper is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

I have heard alot of people say they have lost power with the PP intake.
__________________
2000 GT 665/540rwhp/rwtq On pump gas
Best 1/4 638hp street tune 11.01, best trap 134MPH, 80*+day, 10.5" DD Cobra R's & 315/35/17 DR'S
DYNO VID --->
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9uOS732mdA
  Reply With Quote
Old October 23rd, 2007, 07:54 AM   #20
mm's nitrous mod
 
SWEET2KSTANG's Avatar
 
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,430
SWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud ofSWEET2KSTANG has much to be proud of
iTrader: 8 reviews
Default

its all about velocity with n/a, if you can not get the air to move you will lose power. especially when it comes to port work, that is why the people that do it want to know specificly what the car will be used for. it is easy to go over board with porting, cams, clutch, etc. once there is boost on the car, all that work will help. it will still take a good amount of boost with pretty good size head unit to utilize all the work.
__________________


project warhorse under construction
being built by MP2 Performance
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Disappointed
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Disappointed Dyno craigkoz00 94-95 18 April 28th, 2007 08:19 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:04 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.