![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing A Question About Prochager With High Compression in the 99-04 Forum. is it true that prochargers like high compression? if it is... why? i no using ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 327
|
A Question About Prochager With High Compression
__________________
2001 bullitt- 3 73 gears, bbk x pipe, bbk LT headers, JLT cai, 125 shot and tuned. (as far as performance mods) 2003 mach1- 4 10s, mac prochamber, JLT short ram. |
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 681
|
Not sure where you got that one, but Prochargers like any other F/I system need low compresion.
__________________
2004 Mustang GT The difference between a girlfriend and wife is about 50 pounds. |
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,189
|
This little read might help a bit... http://www.motorsportsdigest.com/tech/forced2.htm |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 1,512
|
Boost = low compression
__________________
Its not how fast you drive, but how you drive fast. 2002 Mustang GT... Just The Usual Bolt-Ons
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 Mustang GT Conv.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Edgewater, FL
Posts: 1,711
|
__________________
![]() 2004 GT Boosted by Vortech |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.023@103.46 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 7,145
|
but boost really likes compression, stock moyors dont like both. You will make more power with a high comprssion motor and blower and can do it safely with race gas, and forged inturnals.
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: looking for free hand jobs in poland springs nebraska... silly gooses
Posts: 10,836
|
i have always been told run a lower compression ... around 8.5-9 when boosting ... on the other hand... if you have a strong motor and a bottle ... you can crank that compression out the ass... 11 and up if you wanted
__________________
slow car club - crew member 8 of 9
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
MM Fanatic
2000 mustang gt
12.01@114.69
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 4,027
|
cylinder pressure! the roots and screw blower almost instantly deliver full boost. instantly creating higher pressures. a centri is a little more forgiving since the boost is not all or nothing. you can run a little higher compression and get away with it since timing and fuel tables are adjustable through the rpm range. cyinder pressure will still be high, but can also be tuned out if everything is done properly.
__________________
stock long block, bolt ons, slicks, and a little squeeze 1/4 E.T. 12.06@114.69 ![]() Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you: 1. Jesus Christ 2. The American G. I. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom. |
|
|
#9 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,909
|
right on buddy, lots of misinformation in this thread, the more compression and boost you run, the more power youll make, but it takes great gas and a tune thats spot on. its true that centri blowers like more compression than the tqin screw blowers. weve ran the centris on motors up to 10.5:1 and never had any problems. your safe to run a procharger on your car, but i would suggest looking into paxton novi 2000 for your car
|
|
|
#10 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 Mustang GT
13.023@103.46 @ 5800 FT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 7,145
|
agreed paxton Novi 2000 FTW!
And yes too man people dont understand that to make power, you need more air, higher octane fuel, and cooler air temps. The problem is that stock rods, pistons, and crank do not enjoy the higher pressures, with out pulling a bunch of timing or running 116 octane race gas.
__________________
![]() We expect shit to break, look foward to realizing exactly when it is happening, and than obsess about dropping plenty of cash to rebuild stronger, so we can try to run it hard as hell and break again. We are sick individuals.
|
|
|
#11 |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 GT
Street Fast 16.9@76MPH
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,876
|
The reason that people run less compression and more boost is because the more boost you can get, the more the motor will be helped out on the intake stroke by the blower. That is why a blower makes HP- it creates loads of compression on the firing stroke by packing the cylinder with more air and then pressurizing the intake stroke as well. However, by adjusting fuel octane and timing, more boost can be run even with high compression.
|
|
|
#12 |
|
MM Fanatic
2000 mustang gt
12.01@114.69
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 4,027
|
less sylinder pressure will be more forgiving on pump gas. the more you start pushing the motor the higher the octane will have to be used. then streetability will start to become a factor. that is another reason that the centri's will be a little more forgiving too.
__________________
stock long block, bolt ons, slicks, and a little squeeze 1/4 E.T. 12.06@114.69 ![]() Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you: 1. Jesus Christ 2. The American G. I. One died for your soul, the other for your freedom. |
|
|
#13 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 1,512
|
You better have a far from stock motor to run 10.5.1 or more with a charger. the lower the compression, the most boost you can throw at it. These motors arent very good N/A a.k.a high compression.
__________________
Its not how fast you drive, but how you drive fast. 2002 Mustang GT... Just The Usual Bolt-Ons
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1999 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Riverview, FL
Posts: 2,260
|
Again, the tune makes it or breaks it. If you can do a 8:5-1 or 9, you can safely run a pro charger @ 10+ lbs of boost on pump gas and still make good numbers, provided that you have a motor that can handle it.
__________________
|
|
|
#15 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,909
|
whats wrong with making more power with less boost?
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Woodland Hills, CA
Posts: 681
|
So how long do you think the rings will last with high compression and 10-12 pounds of boost? And I'm not sure we're talking about a 100,000 mile pump gas street driven car here? We use to run our 300ZX Turbo race car under these stresses and we were going thru the motors every 2 races (Endurance road racing). So, if we're talking race cars/motors here, then answer would be different.
__________________
2004 Mustang GT The difference between a girlfriend and wife is about 50 pounds. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: A Question About Prochager With High Compression
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| is 10.5:1 compression too high for a supercharger? | 94' Cobra 351 | Poweradders | 33 | May 5th, 2008 08:05 PM |
| High vs. Low Compression | 87StangLX | Poweradders | 14 | November 17th, 2007 10:42 PM |
| High Compression and FI | blk98gt | 96-98 | 6 | July 3rd, 2007 10:27 AM |
| compression too high for a supercharger? | 94' Cobra 351 | Drag | 3 | January 10th, 2007 11:05 PM |
| Question On Compression | chadjones99 | 5.0 Mustangs | 4 | September 12th, 2006 11:24 AM |