![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Non-Convertible vs Convertible in the 99-04 Forum. so let's say two completely equal GT's would go head to head...regular ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
14.840 @ 4200 FT + brand new track
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 495
|
Non-Convertible vs Convertible
__________________
I WANT AN LS1... I'M 4200 FT ABOVE SEAL LEVEL!!!!!!!!!! READ!!!!! |
|
|
#2 |
|
just another mod.
2003 Mustang Mach 1
12.9@109.3
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 2,408
|
drivers race bro , equal drivers then obviously the coupe has the edge..
__________________
![]() Beautiful |
|
|
#3 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 GT VERT PI at <3
Tell HMUSN he'll never catch me!!!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: "How does this thing work?"***BOOM***"Holy shit!!!, i just killed Zip!!!
Posts: 5,903
|
wrong........
convertibles are way less areodynamic and weigh about 2 hundred lbs more..... there about half a second slower then coupes |
|
|
#4 |
|
Enthusiast
2000 GT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 614
|
With top down they are way less aerodynamic. With top up its the same. They are just heavier.
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
14.840 @ 4200 FT + brand new track
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 495
|
i know the coupes do about a 14.1 - 14.5
__________________
I WANT AN LS1... I'M 4200 FT ABOVE SEAL LEVEL!!!!!!!!!! READ!!!!! |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Buford,GA
Posts: 303
|
well if your going run the 1/4 alot, then a coupe b/c for a vert i know you have to add a roll cage which would add more weight but if your just making a cool street car then i would go with the vert. my .02
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
03 gt vert
lights cant time it
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lincoln NE
Posts: 187
|
just get what u want. My vert out runs most coupes in town, I would trade a half sec any day just to put the top down... iIplan on swapping to a 5.4 this winter if i can afford it and I will put custom full length sub frame conectors and in cockpit tubular conecters then triangulate the the under carage. just to be safe... it will add more weight but it should help it from twisting on me. my point is get what u want then mod it to do what u want
__________________
NX EFI plate 250 jetcustom tune Eibach Pro-Kit Magnaflow cat back high flow cats, 3:55s, ported and polished heads, comp cams, forged pistons/ rods Curently building up 03 mach block w stage 3 port job. look for twins and more n2o |
|
|
#8 |
|
Enthusiast
2000 GT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 614
|
I love my vert! Just need to find a good roll cage now... Want to get some track times, and know they would say get the hell out after one run...
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,189
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Enthusiast
2000 GT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 614
|
How so just curious? The top doesn't flop around or anything. And wont be that noticeable of a difference...
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1999 Mustang GT
13.4 @ 100
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 2,537
|
The extra weight is from all the extra stiffening that the convertibles require, because since they don't have a roof, they need more support underneath the car.
__________________
Brendan '99 Mustang GT [318 rwhp N/A] ![]() For Sale: 2003 Boyd Coddington / Roush California Roadster http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...-roadster.html |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Enthusiast
2000 GT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 614
|
Yeah i knew the weight thing, just not the aerodynamics. Learn something new everyday! But still thats not a huge difference when you start actually modding it.
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
14.840 @ 4200 FT + brand new track
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 495
|
lol, i already have a coupe...i ran a 14.3 my first time out so, i know what i can do, but my buddy is looking to get a vert, just wanna see how much of an advantage i have
__________________
I WANT AN LS1... I'M 4200 FT ABOVE SEAL LEVEL!!!!!!!!!! READ!!!!! |
|
|
#14 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2004 V-6 232
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: TB area Florida
Posts: 1,280
|
Drag. A vinyl top has more drag. There is more friction with the air than a smooth solid metal top. Even the smallest disruptions will have some effect. And no, it does not flap at all. Its very tight when you maintain it correctly.
I will say this though. the "sensation" of speed is alot greater with the top down and the windows down. I love my vert. I wouldnt have it any other way. I have to agree with F02Vert. I would give 2 or even 3 seconds for the vert. Since I dont race ( cuz this sucker is slow anyway), I really enjoy cruising with the top down... and it looks good doin it!
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeQLUyYg3EA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ah1EbIOdAZE PhotoClub Co-Founder K&N FIPK Dual Flowmasters Xcal III
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7
|
coupe vs vert
My coupe was built on a vert frame so where does that put me?? should I make it a hard top vert???
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Enthusiast
88 Gt
not slow
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 570
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Enthusiast
88 Gt
not slow
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 570
|
+1 for you too.... but i still love my non-vert... all opinion,.. but i think it looks cleaner |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 869
|
im partial to coupes...I wouldn't buy a vert becuase im not a fan of verts and i dont like extra weight. But to all thier own. Im not a "top-down" kinda guy and I've always thought coupes look a lil cleaner so i'd take the coupe. In the end, a vert GT is probably no heavier than a cobra. I've always looked at it that way. When you buy a cobra you make a weight trade-off. When buying a vert you're doing the same. There is more drag, but that kind of drag isn't a huge issue until you're running 100+ mph. Basically its like having an extra passenger holdin small parachute out the window.
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englewood, Colorado
Posts: 2,189
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,287
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Non-Convertible vs Convertible
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Convertible Top | 95stangvert | Convertibles | 5 | November 28th, 2007 06:05 AM |
| Convertible Considerations When Buying Parts | Monster90 | Convertibles | 3 | September 21st, 2007 06:47 PM |
| Convertible Top | 5mustang0 | 5.0 Mustangs | 6 | August 16th, 2007 01:22 PM |
| 99 GT convertible | gstern75 | General Tech | 5 | June 9th, 2007 10:41 AM |
| Convertible Top | jblood37 | 99-04 | 3 | April 22nd, 2007 11:18 PM |