| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
2001 Mustang GT
13.46 @ 104.3 3 year old tires
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 200
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Potential Of The New Breed?
Hi all, you know if you guys would stop answering so well... I wouldn't have to post my questions...lol
Okay, so here's what I'm wondering. With all this talk about the '08' Challenger, Charger SRT-8, 300's, GTO's, 350Z's etc... coming out with these higher HP numbers 'stock' and the majority of them being larger engines, I was wondering if anyone knows what the potential of these engines are? Example: I was told with my car that when I s/c, 400rwhp is about as high as I want to make safely before I have to start changing the internals. From what I've read off this site,the Mach 1 is approximately 450-500. Then there is the Cobra with forged internals to which people on this site have told me that close to 1000hp is possible out of the box. So what I'm wondering is: since these newer engines are already a larger displacement, do they already come modified from the manufacturer and can they hold allot more power? And what would my 400rwhp do against these beasts seeing as they are heavier? It's keeping your friends close but your enemies closer...lol Sorry about the interest outside of the 'Ford' but I'm seeing so many more of these cars daily excluding the Challenger so I just want to know what were up against!! As always, thanks for your time!!
__________________
MacGill |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
wondering the same thing but im pretty sure they come stock with forged internals to handle a lot of HP the charger does at least the SRT8 and i deffinetly know the challenger will have forged internals to handle a shit load of HP
__________________
![]() JLT CAI: KOOKS LT's: Comp NSR II's: 4.56's: TR6060: Steeda LCA, UCA: QA1's: Roush rear springs...see garage for more. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MM Fanatic
unstoppable @ speed of light
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Knees deep in dat ass
Posts: 3,104
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
First off. The Mach 1's and pre '03 Cobra's have the same internals as any v-8 GT. So the max safe hp rating will be the same. Potential of the engine may vary, but safe operation on stock internals is the same.
B. It's not necessarily true that any of the cars mentioned come with forged internals, but anything other than the hyperpathetic pistons and cheap rods will be better, allowing said engine to handle more power on stock internals. It's not that they are built ready to handle 800+ hp, but rather built with parts that are just a step above those that Ford uses. I'm not knocking Ford, (hell I'm one of those die hard "push a Ford before driving a Chevy" guys) but it's just the truth of the matter....
__________________
Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. |
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Enthusiast
EVO 8 @ 29psi
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 515
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
2003 EVO 8 The shop built motor, Precision 6262 w/.82 hotside, tial 44mm wg, Buschur RACE 4" FMIC, Kelford 272s etc 524whp @25psi on straight pump gas. 640whp@33psi Pump+meth Race gas number soon. TheShopCt.com |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Resident Bubblehead
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Haymarket, VA
Posts: 6,045
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
the manual has a forged crank, which makes no sense at all considering that the weak link in the motors is not the crank. the cast crank can handle around 600- 650 hp. the pistons on the other hand go bye bye well before that...
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
MM Fanatic
unstoppable @ speed of light
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Knees deep in dat ass
Posts: 3,104
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Sorry... brain fart on that one detail...
__________________
Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 2,241
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
With 400 rwhp, that means about 470 crank hp, you should be able to take on all of these cars without much hassle. You are much lighter then all of them, with the exception of the 350z, and none of them generate 470 hp (and the 350z is only 300 hp, maybe 330 hp if nissan uses their new 3.7L V6). |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Regular
2001 Mustang GT
13.46 @ 104.3 3 year old tires
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 200
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
+1 Thanks Busher that's what I was wondering although I just discovered on another forum the hidden potential of the Mach 1. Very nice out of the box. Thanks Again.
__________________
MacGill |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 2,241
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Yeah the Machs are VERY nice, and underrated. I was going to get one, but I've decided to opt for a termi instead.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Enthusiast
|
The 350z makes 300hp...And the cobra shortblock can handle 1000hp, but not safely...I think the stock shortblock would be a ticking time bomb at that level. Kinda like 500-600rwhp on the stock 302 2-bolt blocks...At 1000hp on any engine, i'd recommend good machining and balancing with very good internals...
as for the stock 96-04 4.6 mustangs excluding the 03-04 cobra, they all have a limit of about 450rwhp. Thats over 500 flywheel hp. With that much, beating those cars mentioned wont be an issue... With 450rwhp you should hang with some higher end cars many times the price of your own car. Notice hang though, i didnt say beat. Many cars at that level have gearing and aerodynamic advantages. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Potential Of The New Breed?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 4v/5.4L (Navi) Potential? | tomzac | Modular Mustangs | 9 | November 30th, 2007 11:29 AM |
| max head Potential | White Thunder | 5.0 Mustangs | 2 | October 25th, 2007 06:53 PM |
| for all that love the pitbull breed | JRuckas | The Clubhouse | 41 | August 27th, 2007 09:29 PM |
| What is the potential of 3.8L v6 | chad | V6 Mustangs | 13 | June 24th, 2007 06:49 PM |
| More Potential? | Kingcater | 94-95 | 6 | February 7th, 2007 04:52 PM |