| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
MM Fanatic
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,204
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 13 reviews
|
O/R Mac H-Pipe VS. BBK O/R H-Pipe?( Difference?)
Whats the difference between the BBK o/r h pipe and the Mac o/r h pipe. Will they sound pretty much the same? I was going to buy a mac but BBK is cheaper haha so i was just wondering.
Also whats the HP gains of a O/R H pipe vs a O/R X Pipe? Thanks
__________________
Last edited by PowerShiftz02GT; January 10th, 2008 at 05:16 PM. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
N/A 4v Guru
2003 Mach 1
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 3,463
Blog Entries: 2
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
The h will net you a little less high end hp but probably not even noticable without a lot of mods, but the h pipe will net you better low end, but probably not noticable with out mods. It realy comes down to what sound you want. H is deeper X is louder and higher pitch. How much did you find the bbk for? I got my mac O/R X for about $160, and you found the bbk cheaper than that?
__________________
![]() Military Crew U.S. Army Aviation Apache's Lead The Way |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
The only difference between those two H pipes would be what material they are made of. I think the they are both actual made from aluminized steel, not SS. They should sound the same if not really close.
The X pipe has more HP gains of the H pipe but they aren't that much. The more power your car makes the more efficient the X pipe becomes. The H pipe gives you more low end torque, but the X pipe gives you more gains higher in the RPM band. The biggest difference between the two is sound.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
MM Fanatic
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,204
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 13 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
MM Fanatic
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,204
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 13 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
N/A 4v Guru
2003 Mach 1
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 3,463
Blog Entries: 2
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
What we mean is the difference between the h and x will not be that noticeable. a mid pipe and cat back can give you around 20hp. Getting an O/R mid pipe is a very nice gain and it sounds a lot better as well.
__________________
![]() Military Crew U.S. Army Aviation Apache's Lead The Way |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
MM Fanatic
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,204
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 13 reviews
|
Yeah i cant wait to dump my stock mid pipe. But ok thanks for the info guys. Im going to stick with the H pipe i think.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
MAYbe 20hp on your mach but us 2v I wouldnt expect any more than 10rwhp with midpipe and catback.
__________________
06 Saleen s281: 3.4 pulley, 39lb inj. KB BAP, steeda cai, steeda belt tensioner, saleen extreme inlet tube, bassani x, magnaflow, MGW, brenspeed tune |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
N/A 4v Guru
2003 Mach 1
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 3,463
Blog Entries: 2
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
No. I wasn't refering to rear wheel. 10-20rwhp is pretty easy to get with a good mid pipe and cat back. obvisouly different setups will get you more or less.
__________________
![]() Military Crew U.S. Army Aviation Apache's Lead The Way |
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
MM Fanatic
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,204
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 13 reviews
|
hmmm well i just have stock catback with Flowtech Welded in mufflers. Soo do you think i can get at least 10HP out of my setup if i added the Mac O/R H pipe? Or do i need an aftermarket catback or something.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
N/A 4v Guru
2003 Mach 1
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 3,463
Blog Entries: 2
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I think you will get 10 with an off road mid pipe, but not too much more. the choke point is the crush bent stock tail pipes, they are 2 1/4 I think, So upgrading to a 2 1/2 mandrel bent catback (especialy a straight thru design) is gonna get you some nice gains as well.
__________________
![]() Military Crew U.S. Army Aviation Apache's Lead The Way |
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
MM Fanatic
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,204
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 13 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
Your gains will be limited due to the fact that you are still using the 2 1/4" stock exhaust tubing.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
N/A 4v Guru
2003 Mach 1
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 3,463
Blog Entries: 2
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
If you like your mufflers, get the 2 1/2 tail pipe kit and flow tubes. weld your mufflers to the flow tubes and bolt em to your mid pipe. then weld your mufflers to the tail pipe kit. Thats one way to do it. But with the mac cat back being mandrel 2 1/2 with tips for about $300 I don't think its worth all the trouble. just MO though
__________________
![]() Military Crew U.S. Army Aviation Apache's Lead The Way |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
Save for some SLP LM 2s, Magnapacks or Borla Stingers.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
MM Fanatic
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,204
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 13 reviews
|
yeah well i could do that. But see my stock midpipe and the mufflers are sooooo Rusty. It probably wont even last me another year. not sure though. So im probably just going to get a new catback anyway. or replace the mufflers with new flowtechs if i really like how the new setup sounds. or i could replace all the tubing like you said. But also if i hook up the mac h pipe thats 2.5" right? and if my stock pipes are 2.25" then will the H pipe hook up to the stock pipes?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
MM Fanatic
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,204
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 13 reviews
|
yeah i was thinking of SLP LM 2 but yeah like doc said those aren't 300 lol. They are liek what 500 or so.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
N/A 4v Guru
2003 Mach 1
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 3,463
Blog Entries: 2
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
__________________
![]() Military Crew U.S. Army Aviation Apache's Lead The Way |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: O/R Mac H-Pipe VS. BBK O/R H-Pipe?( Difference?)
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| H - Pipe Or X - Pipe With Cats? Which Brand For Price? | dave07GT | 2005 - 2010 | 13 | December 11th, 2007 11:59 AM |
| Difference between Offroad Pipe and Stock | 83 5.0 | General Tech | 2 | August 9th, 2006 04:19 AM |