| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Blogs | Garage | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing MPG improvement in the 99-04 Forum. well ill put it this way wen we didnt get traction till 100mph. hands down ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
May 15th, 2008, 10:44 PM
|
#21 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
13.96@97.49
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 428
|
well ill put it this way wen we didnt get traction till 100mph. hands down hes the fastest and hes putting it back in the shop cause valvebody not quite rite.
__________________
13.96 at 97.49 STOCK AUTO |
|
May 15th, 2008, 10:46 PM
|
#22 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Mustang GT
Slow
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Enterprise, Alabama
Posts: 1,322
|
jeez...
thinking 11s on it? i say he go with the spray and not look back. 150 shot and call it a day for a while
__________________
|
||
|
May 15th, 2008, 10:48 PM
|
#23 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
13.96@97.49
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 428
|
13s till new axles and he can floor it but if he can floor it then 12s and yea bottle would be fun
__________________
13.96 at 97.49 STOCK AUTO |
|
May 15th, 2008, 10:50 PM
|
#24 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Mustang GT
Slow
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Enterprise, Alabama
Posts: 1,322
|
13s thats it?
you still dont htink you and I could give him a run for the money?
__________________
|
||
|
May 15th, 2008, 10:53 PM
|
#25 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
13.96@97.49
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 428
|
w some 3.73s maybe on street if he dont hook. if he hooks track or street were dead meat. a new gt dont pull near that hard. he'll track well over 100 in 1/4 mile
__________________
13.96 at 97.49 STOCK AUTO |
|
May 15th, 2008, 10:56 PM
|
#26 | ||
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Mustang GT
Slow
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Enterprise, Alabama
Posts: 1,322
|
so i still stand a chance
WOOT LOL
__________________
|
||
|
May 15th, 2008, 11:00 PM
|
#27 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
13.96@97.49
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 428
|
yea till the 31 splines and he gets the valve body tuned. w a 5.0 ill have alot to work w
__________________
13.96 at 97.49 STOCK AUTO |
|
May 15th, 2008, 11:34 PM
|
#28 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1996 Mustang GT
next year
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,168
|
are u talking bout stroking ur 4.6 or a pushrod 5.0?
__________________
JLT Ram Air Intake, Otherwise stock  |
|
May 15th, 2008, 11:38 PM
|
#29 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
13.96@97.49
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 428
|
pushrod. if u got the cash modulars great but i love the sound of a pushrod and my friends has been awsome and his dads makes me shit my self wen he test nos. mines been wonderful and taught me more about driving but i want speed but i also need gaser so selling mine answers both
__________________
13.96 at 97.49 STOCK AUTO |
|
May 15th, 2008, 11:46 PM
|
#30 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1996 Mustang GT
next year
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,168
|
well honestly i think you can do better (power wise) with a modular 5.0, IMO
__________________
JLT Ram Air Intake, Otherwise stock |
|
May 15th, 2008, 11:56 PM
|
#31 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
13.96@97.49
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 428
|
well if i kept mine i was lookin at 5.4 swap
__________________
13.96 at 97.49 STOCK AUTO |
|
May 16th, 2008, 12:17 AM
|
#32 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1996 Mustang GT
next year
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,168
|
5.4 would be sweet to but ur gonna need a taller hood form what ive read. if u stroked a 5.4 out to 5.8 (351 cc) that would be bad ass too
__________________
JLT Ram Air Intake, Otherwise stock |
|
May 16th, 2008, 12:24 AM
|
#33 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
13.96@97.49
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 428
|
that was the plan but if u saw this fox and rode in my buddies ud prolly be rethinkin it to
__________________
13.96 at 97.49 STOCK AUTO |
|
May 16th, 2008, 12:40 AM
|
#34 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1996 Mustang GT
next year
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,168
|
idk, personally im not a fox fan but you never know
__________________
JLT Ram Air Intake, Otherwise stock |
|
May 16th, 2008, 12:44 AM
|
#35 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
13.96@97.49
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 428
|
well im 18 so my rents pay for a lot but all performance is outa my pocket and w this i may get some help cause my dad had several foxes and capris and hes responsible but behind the wheel ofa v8 it melts away and its wat we all want "TO GO FASTER"
__________________
13.96 at 97.49 STOCK AUTO |
|
May 16th, 2008, 12:57 AM
|
#36 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1996 Mustang GT
next year
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,168
|
ya, my rents my front me the money on ocassion, but i pay for it in the end
__________________
JLT Ram Air Intake, Otherwise stock |
|
May 16th, 2008, 01:06 AM
|
#37 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
13.96@97.49
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Enterprise, AL
Posts: 428
|
yea i pay back w cheap labor and taxi service lol
__________________
13.96 at 97.49 STOCK AUTO |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: MPG improvement
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| carb gas mileage improvement? | nba1341 | 5.0 Mustangs | 15 | April 16th, 2008 11:59 PM |
| what was the EPA Fuel Economy (est): ?? mpg City /?? mpg Highway on a stock 2001 Gt? | RanGer498 | 99-04 | 11 | March 8th, 2008 06:38 PM |
| how much improvement? | 2000roush | 99-04 | 4 | February 20th, 2008 02:56 PM |
| 3:27 to 3:73 much improvement? | cgb6810 | 5.0 Mustangs | 2 | April 11th, 2007 06:20 PM |
| Power Improvement | jblood37 | 99-04 | 6 | January 26th, 2007 09:22 PM |
