![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Heads and Cams question in the 99-04 Forum. Better pick a good intake manifold to go with those cams and ported heads.... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
Newbie
1997 Mustang GT
13.5@100mph
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Eaton, CO
Posts: 37
|
Better pick a good intake manifold to go with those cams and ported heads.
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#22 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: In Reality, why where do you live?
Posts: 221
|
![]() Like everything in the car web forums, most of what people reply with is either personal experience and opinion or regurgitated mindless BS. I just know from my own tuning and all the cams I've worked with. I can say I had never even heard of HiTech till a about a year ago and have yet to see anyone within my race & tuning scene use them. I'll agree I don't speak for everyone with my opinion but I really do believe in the product and Cushman as a person. ![]() I'll check out HiTech's site and talk with the SCT forum and see what they some other tuners say and compare their numbers. I"m open to anyones ideas and input.
__________________
![]() Fast, Reliable & Cheap... ...Pick two |
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: In Reality, why where do you live?
Posts: 221
|
I made 255-260rwhp on 3 different Dynojets with stock cams on my current GT with a 99 2v. Hitech had about 27rwhp gain over my numbers WITH 10.6:1 compression. Cushmans (which I've seen 42rwhp numbers first hand) site claims 30-35rwhp. I will say that not every tuner is as skilled as he/she should be so numbers may very depending on ALOT of different factors. From what I've seen, it doesn't look so good for HiTech but I just started reading
and researching. HiTechs Add and Dynograph Light chop at idle, great driveability. No piston to valve issues. On '96 GT w/ PI head & intake swap, shorties, CAI & tune, car made 287 RWHP & 297 RWTQ. Will make even more with LT's.
__________________
![]() Fast, Reliable & Cheap... ...Pick two |
|
|
#24 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 1,817
|
there is no need. our intake manifolds are good and won't become a hindrance for quite a while as far as power goes
__________________
![]() Mods: Fidanza Al Flywheel, Steeda UDP, EMP/Stewart Components WP, PP Plenum, K&N FIPK, Mac Prochamber, Pypes Violator Catback WhtPny's Videos
|
|
|
#25 |
|
July 08 ROTM/MM's Most Eligible Bachelor
2004 Mach 1
Too Slow
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Giving Zip an Amish Butter Churn
Posts: 3,385
|
Very nice choice
__________________
![]() SNEAKER CREW MEMBER #3 Public Service Announcement: White_Fang has no clue what he is talking about. Please DO NOT take information from this guy. |
|
|
#26 | |
|
SoMuchCoolerThanChiaGutt
2004 Mustang GT
12.88 @ 112
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 7,438
|
tim sprayed a 150 with a bad window switch and it did the nicest 12 foot fire ball after blowing his intake and JLT to bits.
__________________
Have a WHITE99 kind of day. www.myspace.com/gtsetgo www.myspace.com/philfriedman www.myspace.com/robsidea A hard-on doesn't count as personal growth. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Heads and Cams question
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| heads and cams!?!?!? | lilmarc1988 | 99-04 | 15 | March 14th, 2008 05:33 PM |
| Heads / Cams Question | KhaosGT | 99-04 | 13 | November 12th, 2007 03:08 AM |
| 4.6 PI HEADS AND CAMS | 2001bullitt | For Sale | 7 | September 25th, 2007 02:20 AM |
| Question for those who are running stage 2 heads and cams | 96BluePony1261 | Modular Mustangs | 5 | February 18th, 2007 03:57 PM |
| cams and heads | stang4life | 99-04 | 1 | January 27th, 2007 09:01 PM |