Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Modular Mustangs > 99-04
Reload this Page

289 (4.6) vs 302 (5.0)


Discussing 289 (4.6) vs 302 (5.0) in the 99-04 Forum. Originally Posted by Eagle2000GT At one time there was a big push for the United ...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

Page 3 of 3 < 12 3
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old October 2nd, 2008, 01:38 PM   #41
Regular
 
2008 GCSRT8, 1965 Coupe;
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 216
Default
Originally Posted by Eagle2000GT View Post
At one time there was a big push for the United States to go to the metric system. I think we got about half way there. To be honest, I still think in terms of cubic inches and miles per hour, not liters and kilometers per hour.
yeah... and it was around 1980... stupid 80's
 

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement
Old October 2nd, 2008, 02:30 PM   #42
Enthusiast
 
Eagle2000GT's Avatar
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 689
Default
Originally Posted by jivepepper View Post
4.6l 4v 03 cobra's have made 1000 hp on the stock long block. I see no reason for a 302.

The stock 5.0 blocks are only good for 500rwhp regardless of what pistons, rods, and crank you run. So you need a new $3000.00 after market block. Then you would still need to forge the internals, and all the machine work involved. Plus then you'll need after market heads and cams, plus a power adder just to break 450. The stock heads and intake flow for crap on the 5.0's

My shortblock was 3200 shipped to my door, and ready to install. I made 516 on the stock heads and intake.
That's the pushrod 5.0 not the 4.6 stroker 5.0 or the 4.6 big bore 5.0.
__________________
latest tune: 370 rwhp/377 rwtq
Garage: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...-member-11329/
Previously Owned:
1966 Coronet 500, 426 ci est. 290-300 rwhp
1969 Camaro RS/SS, 350 ci est. 210-220 rwhp
Today is the real muscle car era.
 
Old October 3rd, 2008, 12:10 AM   #43
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
jivepepper's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Under a sombrero
Posts: 1,764
Default
^That's what I just said.
__________________
Spending money I don't have, on parts I don't need. to impress people I don't know....
2k MUSTANG GT 598/531 RWHP/RWTQ Just a little S-trim....
 
Old October 3rd, 2008, 09:21 AM   #44
Regular
 
2008 GCSRT8, 1965 Coupe;
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 216
Default
god i love this... all they have to do is wiki windsor and modular...
 
Reply
Page 3 of 3 < 12 3



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: 289 (4.6) vs 302 (5.0)
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
289 to late model 302 swap. thunder2335 Classic Mustangs 4 July 23rd, 2008 10:18 PM
289 and 351W heads on a 302 block? delgadog 94-95 3 June 3rd, 2008 12:02 AM
289/302 Long Block good for 500HP jony51999 For Sale 0 November 29th, 2007 07:07 PM
351W firing order in a 289/302 65 B/FX Engine 3 March 28th, 2007 01:10 AM
Weight of Dart sportsman 302 compared to stock 302 painfully slow 5.0 Mustangs 3 February 23rd, 2007 05:47 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:59 AM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.