| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#41 |
|
Regular
93 GT
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 185
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#42 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 35
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forever in our hearts travis_afx
2003 SVT Cobra
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Enid, OK
Posts: 4,312
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
LOL! I hate to say it, but it's true. Anyone that buys a camaro or mustang to get chicks is an idiot. Probably 95% of the people that gave me compliments or wanted to check out my camaros were dudes. The percentage of chicks is a little higher for the cobra, but not much.
__________________
![]() 03 Cobra-Slow 02 SS, 00 Z/28-Gone Rest In Peace Travis Billings
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Nitrous Injected V6
12's?
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chester County, PA
Posts: 2,414
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
at least your not going for a challenger, screw dodge
![]()
__________________
![]() Project Red Magic -Full Intake, Full Exhuast,Geared, Tune, Sprayed, Dropped- -18 Inch Hypercoated Saleens wrapped in Nittos- |
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 35
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Noob Slayer
2004 Mustang GT
13.82 @ 101.09
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,458
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
4v supercharged > LS1 > 4v > 3v > lt1 > 2v i would take a 2v over an lt1 anyday but pound for pound the gm engines make really impressive numbers with minor stuff. H/C/I LS1 with a 150 shot is what im building next as a second car. i would never trade my cobra for a catfish or trans am though.
__________________
![]() 2003 Black Cobra 10th Anniversary 2.8 Kenne Bell Mammoth LC - Built SRA - T56 - E85 - Spray - Stock Longblock - True Forged Mach 5s 2004 Silver GT 5 speed - SOLD MM Cobra Club Member# 97 |
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forever in our hearts travis_afx
2003 SVT Cobra
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Enid, OK
Posts: 4,312
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Maybe a Ferrari or some crazy shit like that. It wouldn't hurt your chances with the ladies.
__________________
![]() 03 Cobra-Slow 02 SS, 00 Z/28-Gone Rest In Peace Travis Billings
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Enthusiast
2002 Camaro SS
12.XX@11X??
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Beaufort NC
Posts: 514
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Ha camaro being a chick magnet not happening neither was my gt, but the chicks do like my camaro though but it isnt what pulled them! Either way I like mine, it has its quirks like any car biggest one being the 10 bolt rear. Ive been lucky *knock on wood* with about 20 track passes with low 1.7 60's on it, just no clutch dumps!
__________________
2006 GTO A4-13.3 2.1 60' Motor/12.0 1.7 60' 100 Shot otherwise stock |
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,607
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
This was true till the 2v Trick Flow heads came out. Someone on this forum is in the 11s N/A with his Auto 2v GT.
__________________
I like to go to Subway because the women there have to make ME a sandwich. |
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,607
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
I like to go to Subway because the women there have to make ME a sandwich. |
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,607
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I could NOT find any 02 Fbodies that were in as good of condition with even 20k miles on it that was less than 17k. And those were the autos. Most went for 20k+ for those cars. Even with the 17k ones I saved 5k. With 5k I could make my 2v faster than any stock LS1 being sold for 17k. Faster than a lot of modded ones too. Can you buy a older, higher mileage fbody that isn't as nice for less than 12k? Sure. But I didn't want one that was ran into the ground already.
__________________
I like to go to Subway because the women there have to make ME a sandwich. |
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
The LS1's are great motors. The LT-1's aren't bad, but theres not anywhere near as much after market as the LS series.
The difference between SS & Z28. SS has a better air box adding close to 15 extra hp and a few suspension differences. The LS1's can be modded very easily and cheaply. The interior quality is just as good as the Mustang, if not slightly better. We used to have a 01 LS1 Trans Am. I have a 02 GT Mustang....I loved the Trans Am to death but my mom couldn't see having to put premium in a car she drove 70 miles a day. My dad's idea to buy the car to begin with (Duhhhh). So she downgraded to a 04 Grand Prix GTP (not bad at all, still premium fuel though)...now she's down to a damn 08 Civic EX....I lost all respect for her car choosing abilities. lmao. |
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 595
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Ha my bad, its a 96 LT1. lol
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
04 mustang gt
7.21 @ 98
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: upstate sc
Posts: 5,923
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
lol don't even bother getting the lt1 if you wanna "start out with more power from the beginning" and have 350hp with bolt ons only
lol completely pointless. me and my buddies 6spd lt1 were even when stock and then with gear and x pipe it was an easy win for me.
__________________
![]() cams + 150 shot |
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,607
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I drove both cars extensively before choosing the Mustang. One of the main reasons? Interior quality. Not that the Mustang is fancy inside, it's not. The interior is simply put together better. I have yet to drive in a fbody that didn't rattle shortly after bought. Even ls1tech makes jokes about the constant rattling.
__________________
I like to go to Subway because the women there have to make ME a sandwich. |
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
Newbie
2002 Mustang GT
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 19
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I looked at both cars before i ended up purchasing my Mustang which i am very happy with my cousin is more of a camaro guy both cars are very fun to drive i just liked to look of the mustang better. All personal preference though
|
|
|
|
#57 | ||
|
Noob Slayer
2004 Mustang GT
13.82 @ 101.09
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,458
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
you said in the street section it was a 96 swapped ls1 when i told you the 96s came with the lt1.
id hope that a car with IRS making 480rwhp would lose to a car making 400rwhp with out the 150 pill. what does it make on the 150? 525rwhp/580rwtq
__________________
![]() 2003 Black Cobra 10th Anniversary 2.8 Kenne Bell Mammoth LC - Built SRA - T56 - E85 - Spray - Stock Longblock - True Forged Mach 5s 2004 Silver GT 5 speed - SOLD MM Cobra Club Member# 97 |
||
|
|
|
#58 | |||||||
|
Regular
9.74@142
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SWFL
Posts: 367
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Where to start.....multim'fnquote FTW!
Shit it would have the potential to run those times without the spray, on a car that is dialed in right (gears, suspension, slicks etc)
And the LT1's have had a pretty good surge in aftermarket support as of late. there have been some records broken and the basic H/C pacages are not to shabby. Like Reverend Dexter stated, the LT gets a bad rap due to the better performing LS. But a well running LT1 is quite a bit quicker then most think. An LT1 can be a great platform to start out with. My wifes 97 has been a strong runner from the start: with full exhaust, Cai, and an EWP, it ran consistant low 13's @ 106-107 (13.12 @ 107 was the best). Those were with soft launches (like 2.2 60fts) It put down 292/321. I added a set of factory heads ported and a fairly mild custom cam, supporting valvetrain, along with a 58mm TB (not really needed, a 52 would have suffised), and a set of 04 Cobra 39lb injectors. Tuned it put down 412/367 with closed exhaust and some slip from the stock clutch. I added a 3" cutout (exhaust cutouts make a HUGE difference in the f bodys), mcleod clutch, and 4.10s. Still launching soft due to the stock 10 bolt, I was able to run consistant high 11's @ 120-122 (11.7 @ 122 was the best, with a 1.9 60 ft). It was full weight aside from running the welds off of my cobra (dual bolt pattern FTW!) It is on stock suspension right now, with some supension and a stout rear, I'm looking at hitting an 11.3x if I can get a 1.5 60ft The rear end is one if any 4th gens shortcomings. The weak 7.5" 10 bolt is on borrowd time with dragstrip launches. The key to making it live (much like the Cobra IRS), is to avoid axle hop. The t56 is a strong trans that can take a lot of abuse. The GM version already has a 26spl input shaft. If and when you do have to rebuild it, upgrade to billet 3-4 slider keys, bronze 1-2, 3-4 shift pads, and a steel 3-4 shift fork, and you will have a trans that should take mostly everything that you throw at it.
__________________
|
|||||||
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: tell me about camaros
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Camaros not holding up that well | ReverendDexter | The Clubhouse | 24 | May 5th, 2009 08:54 AM |
| So how FAST are the new camaros supposed to be? | vomitron | All Other Vehicles | 38 | January 30th, 2009 12:17 AM |
| Hondas suck , Camaros rock | Fastback91 | Videos | 1 | November 16th, 2008 09:23 AM |
| Difference Of Camaros.... | DeMello | All Other Vehicles | 23 | April 17th, 2008 01:11 AM |