| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
|
06 Stang V6 Vs 06 Civic Si 2.0L V-tec
Okay lets end the spec here and ask around for some opinions on this situation?
I own a 2006 mustang V6 Added K&N Air Charger Intake And FlowMaster Exhaust nothing more has been added, YET! lol My brother owns a 2006 Honda Civic Si V-Tec no modifications Yet! Heres the specs on his honda civic: 197 horsepower at 7800 rpm and 139 lb.-ft. of torque at 6100 rpm. and heres the specs on the stang: 210 Horsepower @ 5250 and 250 Torque @ 3500 so what do you all think this outcome could be, hes gonna get a cold air intake added and possibly either a flowmaster or megaflow exhaust added before we go to the track at irwindale, ca
__________________
MODS: In Garage ![]()
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
|
have your mods been tuned?
ive raced those new civic SI's once. i kinda loss but i started all wrong...he came up on me when i was at 3rd at about 2,400 rpms and never down shifted...from a dig i might have had a chance..but he wasnt stock either i think you can take him
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
|
Yes Mine HAve Been Tuned but i have to Say My 3rd lags pretty badly only bad thing about hydrolic cluthes on these 06 stangs and he has a spring loaded cluth and got pull in 3rd so kinda scary but we will soon find out who will get pwned
__________________
MODS: In Garage ![]()
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
i beat an 06 SI the other day, a friend of mine just walked it off the lot & was talking shit.....
but, mine is a slightly modded 94 GT too! :-)
__________________
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2461223 1994 GT: MSD 6AL, BBK O/R H-Pipe, Dynomax Race Bullet mufflers, 3:73 rear, Hurst Short Shifter, MAC cold air intake & much more coming soon! |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
|
(Cough Cheater LoL)
ooh well u had the advantage right off 94 Gt vs 06 Si 4L 2.0 but the V-tec kinda makes it a low end V6 which has advantages over other 4Ltr's out there, do you have hydrolic cluth on your gt or is it spring loaded like average clutch's are?
__________________
MODS: In Garage ![]()
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Steamboat Springs, CO
Posts: 689
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
are the hondas a 4 or a 6 cylender?
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Newbie
|
What's the weight of the two vehicles? The power numbers are nice, but don't mean much without any weight figures. The new Mustangs are heavy.
__________________
Until I get a Mustang, I'm just driving my Cherokee like one! |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 462
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
should be rather even with stang having the ability to edge ahead, it will come down to drivers, with that open dif rear id bet the stang driver would have to be better though
06 si curb- 2877 lbs i think and it is a 2L 4 cyl.
__________________
God... That Euro import guy is really starting to get on my nerves... my car can only beat his in a strait line(maybe)
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
|
Yes the si is a 4 cylinder 2L V-Tec, in my personal experiance i think your right Sa-Wait... it is up to the drivers, the stangs handicap is the hydrolic clutch=limited speed shifting it will hang up will not let you speed shift now as for the si, hes on the spring loaded clutch and has no limits on speedshifting so thats were i see my stangs handicap and 3rd on the stang is a lagger virtually no power in 3rd until about 3800-4000rpm's unlike the civic he has pull in all gears is there anyway this can be adjusted on the stang so i can get a little more low end torque in 3rd, 1st and 2nd are fine no problems just the lag in 3rd and the hydrolic clutch "SUCKS" so let me know if this is a ez fix
__________________
MODS: In Garage ![]()
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Regular
|
__________________
MODS: In Garage ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Banned
|
257rwtq.......with intake and exhaust i highly doubt that.. especially to the wheels. thats high the hp is a bit high to...the new 05+ v6's dont have that much hp....thats almost 99-04 GT numbers
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 462
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
thats what i said earlier, but im glad people agree (see previous post to see what i think about this)
yeah, i do know the approx. curb for most post 80's stangs
__________________
God... That Euro import guy is really starting to get on my nerves... my car can only beat his in a strait line(maybe)
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Regular
|
my bad i had a different perspective on that question im not sure the exact rwhp or rwtq i did have the intake checked to see if it is producing whats its specified 2 and it was but didnt get exact #'s sry
__________________
MODS: In Garage ![]()
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1993 5.ohhhh
12.97 @140mph
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 6,077
![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
Race from a dig and your torque will end the argument.
__________________
02 Pewter z28, hoosiers/lid/exhaust/spray...125mph 1993 gt Sold, already missed ![]() --Moates Quarter horse $225-- --Cobra intake $150-- --tremec 3550 bell and shifter $1100--
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 462
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
that is if he doesnt spin like hell. have you seen a stock one at the track?
They REALLY need posi-trak
__________________
God... That Euro import guy is really starting to get on my nerves... my car can only beat his in a strait line(maybe)
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In my house.
Posts: 997
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I think the Si has the edge personally. 2877 lbs yeah, but it's got some nifty toys aside from the 197 hp.
Limited slip differential = two tires putting down power instead of one and a slick as shit 6 speed. But it'll depend on if he can put the engine through it's paces properly. |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
if it is any concern my roommate just went 14.70's in his 5 speed 05 v6 mustang.
I dont think that si will come close to a 14 sec quarter mile. Now whether or not my roommates car is a factory freak or not I dont know about that
__________________
Just a truck 5.4 3v: 264hp 317ft lbs rock stock piecing together the next project faster than your first sexual experience |
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Banned
|
and my bad i had a different perspective on that question im not sure the exact rwhp or rwtq i did have the intake checked to see if it is producing whats its specified 2 and it was but didnt get exact #'s sry no...not rrwhp or rwtq at all not even at the crank with those mods that pulls like 210 stock at the crank...with intake and exhaust...i'd give you 225hp being nice. if its just cat backs lol ive give you less then 220
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In my house.
Posts: 997
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | ||
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
if stock means factory intake, exhaust, tires, filter, oil, plugs wires, then yes its bone stock, there was an auto goin 15.1's all day long
__________________
Just a truck 5.4 3v: 264hp 317ft lbs rock stock piecing together the next project faster than your first sexual experience |
||
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 06 Stang V6 Vs 06 Civic Si 2.0L V-tec
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What should I do to my civic | stagecrewgod | All Other Vehicles | 36 | April 10th, 2007 03:32 PM |