[mdvaldosta]

Ever since the mid-90’s Subaru and Mitsubishi have been going at it in the performance saloon market. In the late-90’s both manufactures took their rivalry to the dirt, providing cars for the World Rally Championship for both privateers and manufacture sponsored teams. In early 2001...

Read The Rest at Modded Autos.

[nba1341]

40,000 for a 4 cylinder car ill have to pass

[G.T. Rags]

Originally Posted by nba1341 40,000 for a 4 cylinder car , that turns high 12 seconds 1/4 miles, and still gets 25mpg, ill have to jump on that shit

good boy

[nba1341]

Originally Posted by 96GTRagTop good boy

I rather pay 30,000 for a mustang gt that does the same exact things you just mentioned lol

[G.T. Rags]

the sti and evo will get that MPG city dude.........

and they can take 90* turn at 75mph.... something a GT, MACH, an Shelby can't do.

these cars may not have any top end, but they've got balls down low.

my friend had an 04 STI back in 04 05, and after riding in that car, i wouldn't mind her as a DD.

[TheLookerTheWatcher]

I always followed Subaru in the WRC and loved the year when Mitsu was absolutely dominated and never made a come back. i don't like the new Imprezas as much as the ones right before hatch though.

[Onemanzu]

to be honest, i don't like the new MR or Spec C ... i think they both look like shit, but i have to take a non bias stance...

would love a plain jane evo X though

[ReverendDexter]

Originally Posted by TheLookerTheWatcher I always followed Subaru in the WRC and loved the year when Mitsu was absolutely dominated and never made a come back.

Not for lack of trying.

Mitsubishi tried to come back into rally; they kept dropping out, though, because their cars kept falling apart.

Evos may have better performance on asphalt, but they just don't hold up like a Subaru when you put them both on dirt.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the year that Mitsu dominated the year they had Tommi Makonen (sp?) driving?