Motor decision
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Racer's Corner > Autocross

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
View Poll Results: Which build?
302 2v build 1 20.00%
302 4V build 1 20.00%
New 5.0 swap 3 60.00%
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old December 9th, 2011, 11:31 AM   #1
Regular
 
2004 Mustang GT
13.2@105.66
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 232
Smilieboy is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

Motor decision


So with the decision to build the heck out of the GT and not get the boss, i need to decide what to do with the motor. What follows is the options and my thoughts on each. Cars focus is autox and open track. I don't care about class, i am building the car for my entertainment. A tub K-member will be purchased so that is not a concern.

Option one: 5.0 big bore teksid with TFS 2V heads and aggressive cam.

Thoughts; i haven't seen too much on numbers for this combo. Cost wise it is the cheapest, but not by much. I wouldn't need new exhaust, ecm, or intake. It also would likely end up producing the least amount of power, which means for autox i wouldn't end up being over powered.

Option two: 5.0 big bore teksid with 4V heads

Likely the most expensive, would require new exhaust, ecm, etc. Would have more power up top. Everything with this just screams expensive as hell. Power would easily be over 400.

Option three: New 5.0 swap. Just based on my initial cost comparison, this may actually be cheaper than the 5.0 4V. Limited fab work but everything for this is also expensive. Issues are is this is still a new swap so i am not sure how well it will hold up. I am getting a production motor, the boss motor would be nice but i haven't seen one at a decent price. The production motor is okay, but to improve it like i would like to would cost alot more. However, this would be the most bad ass build of the three.

Thoughts, opinions, complaints, etc accepted.
__________________


JLT CAI, Bullit intake swap, SCT tuner (custom 93 octane tune), MAC LTs, o/r prochamber and catbacks
Steeda pullies, Bilstein HDs, 300 lb coilovers (front), MM Road and track TA springs (rear), MM panhard bar and TA, Torsen T2R

2012 Boss 302
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old December 10th, 2011, 12:30 AM   #2
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
94racing's Avatar
 
2006 mustang gt500racecar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: athens ohio
Posts: 1,857
94racing will become famous soon enough94racing will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to 94racing
Default

pm sent man
__________________

Check out our race team!
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?s...3927011?v=wall
American Iron Mustang- ^1.6 lateral gs
03 Steeda 1.2 lateral Gs-ra1
08 Gt
  Reply With Quote
Old December 10th, 2011, 01:28 PM   #3
Newbie
 
RockRacing's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 42
RockRacing is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

IMO, the lighter, the better. I know a guy who used to race a '96 cobra in my class and he was actually planning to switch to a 2v for just that reason.

One idea I actually toyed with was installing the Jaguar AJ-V8 in my mustang. It's the 4.0l 4V V8 found in the Lincoln LS and Thunderbird as well as Jaguars, but it would take a lot of work (though nothing unreasonable) to get it to work.
__________________
#21 American Iron 1996 Mustang GT
  Reply With Quote
Old December 10th, 2011, 01:32 PM   #4
1 Wheel Peel
 
GreenMustang00's Avatar
 
2000 Mustang 393w
2001 Mustang GT Vert
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,583
GreenMustang00 has a spectacular aura aboutGreenMustang00 has a spectacular aura aboutGreenMustang00 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 4 reviews
Default

If money is an issue go with the 2v and cams The new Coyote 5.0 wont be a cheap swap.
__________________

2000 393w Swapped Vert
2001 GT Vert
2002 Six Banger
  Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2011, 06:16 PM   #5
Regular
 
2004 Mustang GT
13.2@105.66
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 232
Smilieboy is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

Does this sound like a good deal or go with the aluminator shortblock from ford?

MUSTANG COBRA | Sean Hyland Motorsports
__________________


JLT CAI, Bullit intake swap, SCT tuner (custom 93 octane tune), MAC LTs, o/r prochamber and catbacks
Steeda pullies, Bilstein HDs, 300 lb coilovers (front), MM Road and track TA springs (rear), MM panhard bar and TA, Torsen T2R

2012 Boss 302
  Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2011, 12:49 AM   #6
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
94racing's Avatar
 
2006 mustang gt500racecar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: athens ohio
Posts: 1,857
94racing will become famous soon enough94racing will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to 94racing
Default

Little on the high side i think. Modular depot has the aluminator stuff i think might look at them
__________________

Check out our race team!
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?s...3927011?v=wall
American Iron Mustang- ^1.6 lateral gs
03 Steeda 1.2 lateral Gs-ra1
08 Gt
  Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2011, 12:58 AM   #7
1 Wheel Peel
 
GreenMustang00's Avatar
 
2000 Mustang 393w
2001 Mustang GT Vert
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,583
GreenMustang00 has a spectacular aura aboutGreenMustang00 has a spectacular aura aboutGreenMustang00 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 4 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 94racing View Post
Little on the high side i think. Modular depot has the aluminator stuff i think might look at them
This. I wouldnt pay that much for it.
__________________

2000 393w Swapped Vert
2001 GT Vert
2002 Six Banger
  Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2011, 02:36 PM   #8
Regular
 
2004 Mustang GT
13.2@105.66
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 232
Smilieboy is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

So in your opinions, which one of these setups would be better for autox/open track fun. Competition comes second behind fun so i am not worried if i am in a class or not.
__________________


JLT CAI, Bullit intake swap, SCT tuner (custom 93 octane tune), MAC LTs, o/r prochamber and catbacks
Steeda pullies, Bilstein HDs, 300 lb coilovers (front), MM Road and track TA springs (rear), MM panhard bar and TA, Torsen T2R

2012 Boss 302
  Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2011, 03:04 PM   #9
Regular
 
THE RY4N's Avatar
 
1994 / 2001 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Andover, Minnesota
Posts: 174
THE RY4N will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I think you should go with option one, it will be the cheapest and if you want a lightweight track car with around 400rwhp that's a good setup.

This guy put down 341rwhp with the trick flows and comp cams and similar bolt on you have now and 315's on the back. with that same setup and a 5.0l teksid, you could keep your bullitt intake and LT's, put some of the money you save from going 4v buy an aluminum driveshaft and more bolt ons and put down 400rwhp with less weight and problems .

__________________


1994 Mustang GT Black-SOLD
2001 Mustang GT Electric Green
2001 Mazda Protege MP3
  Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2011, 03:27 PM   #10
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
94racing's Avatar
 
2006 mustang gt500racecar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: athens ohio
Posts: 1,857
94racing will become famous soon enough94racing will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to 94racing
Default

Or the prebuilt motor i offered
__________________

Check out our race team!
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?s...3927011?v=wall
American Iron Mustang- ^1.6 lateral gs
03 Steeda 1.2 lateral Gs-ra1
08 Gt
  Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2011, 03:55 PM   #11
Regular
 
2004 Mustang GT
13.2@105.66
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 232
Smilieboy is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by THE RY4N View Post
I think you should go with option one, it will be the cheapest and if you want a lightweight track car with around 400rwhp that's a good setup.

This guy put down 341rwhp with the trick flows and comp cams and similar bolt on you have now and 315's on the back. with that same setup and a 5.0l teksid, you could keep your bullitt intake and LT's, put some of the money you save from going 4v buy an aluminum driveshaft and more bolt ons and put down 400rwhp with less weight and problems .

TrickFlow Twisted Wedge Heads Dyno - YouTube
trust me, weight is coming out of this car like titties in a drift car.

Originally Posted by 94racing View Post
Or the prebuilt motor i offered
I've thought about it, but i just feel this challenge to build a damn good 2v. Plus, from a video of someone doing a similar set up, it would sound just as sick as yours did. I am still waiting on results, but 400 sounds easily obtainable.
__________________


JLT CAI, Bullit intake swap, SCT tuner (custom 93 octane tune), MAC LTs, o/r prochamber and catbacks
Steeda pullies, Bilstein HDs, 300 lb coilovers (front), MM Road and track TA springs (rear), MM panhard bar and TA, Torsen T2R

2012 Boss 302
  Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2011, 08:01 PM   #12
1 Wheel Peel
 
GreenMustang00's Avatar
 
2000 Mustang 393w
2001 Mustang GT Vert
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 3,583
GreenMustang00 has a spectacular aura aboutGreenMustang00 has a spectacular aura aboutGreenMustang00 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 4 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Smilieboy View Post
So in your opinions, which one of these setups would be better for autox/open track fun. Competition comes second behind fun so i am not worried if i am in a class or not.
It all depends on budget.

A 2v with cams, intake headers, tb, and etc can be a vicous car for auto x.. Also spend some more on suspension with the money you saved.

But on my world I would do a 4v stroker.

The 3rd choice the coyote will be alot more work and money. Badass but not good for the wallets
__________________

2000 393w Swapped Vert
2001 GT Vert
2002 Six Banger
  Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2011, 09:14 PM   #13
Regular
 
2004 Mustang GT
13.2@105.66
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 232
Smilieboy is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by GreenMustang00 View Post
It all depends on budget.

A 2v with cams, intake headers, tb, and etc can be a vicous car for auto x.. Also spend some more on suspension with the money you saved.

But on my world I would do a 4v stroker.

The 3rd choice the coyote will be alot more work and money. Badass but not good for the wallets
Quite alot has been and a little bit more will be spent on suspension. just haven't decided how far i want to go. Tubular k has been long since decided it shall be. But i can't decide if i want to so coil over on the rear with the road race control arms and adjustable sway bar. Especially since the TA springs have less than 1K miles on them.

The motor is just something i really want to get out of there. TFS heads were going to be the choice but i just didn't and still don't know how far i want to go. This is going to be a huge investment with the actual HP return being something most on this board wouldn't even consider. I want something i can spin to 7+K and not worry about it blowing up.
__________________


JLT CAI, Bullit intake swap, SCT tuner (custom 93 octane tune), MAC LTs, o/r prochamber and catbacks
Steeda pullies, Bilstein HDs, 300 lb coilovers (front), MM Road and track TA springs (rear), MM panhard bar and TA, Torsen T2R

2012 Boss 302
  Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2011, 09:38 PM   #14
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
94racing's Avatar
 
2006 mustang gt500racecar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: athens ohio
Posts: 1,857
94racing will become famous soon enough94racing will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to 94racing
Default

Personnaly i would want to be able to wind it around 8k for roadcourae spec. On the 3v we have the limiter set at 8,500. With a higher rpm range i would say less shifting in autox too!
Is the mmr block aluminum? Im sure they would sell you one if not
__________________

Check out our race team!
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?s...3927011?v=wall
American Iron Mustang- ^1.6 lateral gs
03 Steeda 1.2 lateral Gs-ra1
08 Gt
  Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2011, 09:43 PM   #15
Regular
 
2004 Mustang GT
13.2@105.66
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 232
Smilieboy is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

I haven't even talked to mmr yet. Mostly been looking around to see how much it cost to get the block bored and other people's opinions. I won't go with anything unless it is aluminum.
__________________


JLT CAI, Bullit intake swap, SCT tuner (custom 93 octane tune), MAC LTs, o/r prochamber and catbacks
Steeda pullies, Bilstein HDs, 300 lb coilovers (front), MM Road and track TA springs (rear), MM panhard bar and TA, Torsen T2R

2012 Boss 302
  Reply With Quote
Old December 21st, 2011, 11:26 PM   #16
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
94racing's Avatar
 
2006 mustang gt500racecar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: athens ohio
Posts: 1,857
94racing will become famous soon enough94racing will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to 94racing
Default

Originally Posted by Smilieboy View Post
I haven't even talked to mmr yet. Mostly been looking around to see how much it cost to get the block bored and other people's opinions. I won't go with anything unless it is aluminum.
just also remember you may need to change some stuff out for the car in the front with different spring rate/shocks since you will be alooot lighter in the front with the kmember/lighter motor ect. i dont like the idea of boring aluminum motors out but if its done right its ok. there is somebody that makes a 347 aluminum block. the hawk tire rep has one in his car but he dropped a valve this summer and trashed half the motor.
__________________

Check out our race team!
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?s...3927011?v=wall
American Iron Mustang- ^1.6 lateral gs
03 Steeda 1.2 lateral Gs-ra1
08 Gt
  Reply With Quote
Old December 22nd, 2011, 02:24 PM   #17
Regular
 
2004 Mustang GT
13.2@105.66
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 232
Smilieboy is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by 94racing View Post
just also remember you may need to change some stuff out for the car in the front with different spring rate/shocks since you will be alooot lighter in the front with the kmember/lighter motor ect. i dont like the idea of boring aluminum motors out but if its done right its ok. there is somebody that makes a 347 aluminum block. the hawk tire rep has one in his car but he dropped a valve this summer and trashed half the motor.
I may have to change the springs up front anyway depending of if i do the rear suspension as well.
__________________


JLT CAI, Bullit intake swap, SCT tuner (custom 93 octane tune), MAC LTs, o/r prochamber and catbacks
Steeda pullies, Bilstein HDs, 300 lb coilovers (front), MM Road and track TA springs (rear), MM panhard bar and TA, Torsen T2R

2012 Boss 302
  Reply With Quote
Old December 27th, 2011, 11:55 AM   #18
g-Force Junkie
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 24
Fast92Coupe is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

If you have the coin I'd go with the Coyote engine. Keep it near stock and it should be the most reliable of the bunch, letting you have more fun on track instead of in the garage.
  Reply With Quote
Old December 27th, 2011, 02:34 PM   #19
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
94racing's Avatar
 
2006 mustang gt500racecar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: athens ohio
Posts: 1,857
94racing will become famous soon enough94racing will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via MSN to 94racing
Default

Boss 302r laguna edt!
__________________

Check out our race team!
http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?s...3927011?v=wall
American Iron Mustang- ^1.6 lateral gs
03 Steeda 1.2 lateral Gs-ra1
08 Gt
  Reply With Quote
Old January 2nd, 2012, 08:32 AM   #20
Regular
 
2004 Mustang GT
13.2@105.66
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 232
Smilieboy is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

So i just wanted to throw another side bar into this thread mostly just in case i change my mind again or if conditions change for what i want to do. If you had 10K for parts, what would you do with the car? Current mods in sig and purpose will not change. Will not be a DD.
__________________


JLT CAI, Bullit intake swap, SCT tuner (custom 93 octane tune), MAC LTs, o/r prochamber and catbacks
Steeda pullies, Bilstein HDs, 300 lb coilovers (front), MM Road and track TA springs (rear), MM panhard bar and TA, Torsen T2R

2012 Boss 302
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Motor decision
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
my first motor build decision??help plz!! jmak556 5.0 Mustangs 25 January 8th, 2011 12:24 AM
Decision for V6 Stang: New Motor or New Block? Exile V6 Mustangs 18 March 22nd, 2010 02:52 PM
460 or 351 decision ajb4507 5.0 Mustangs 14 March 31st, 2008 10:23 PM
rim decision stanged out V6 Mustangs 9 January 17th, 2007 10:33 PM
Rim Decision 00SoSlow Pictures 6 September 6th, 2006 03:22 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.