| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1
|
|
Regular
1967 Mustang Coupe 302 4V
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 184
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
1987 E7TE heads on a 1976 302 block?
I found a pair of 87 E7TE heads off of a ford truck. Will these work with my 1976 302 block? If so, are they better than regular 302 heads from the 71-77 yr range? Because i can get those too.
Thanks, Jordan
__________________
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
91 GT 90 LX 5.0
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: youngstown, ohio
Posts: 1,025
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
If those will work on your block, you mine as well try and get some gt40's from an explorer, they are pretty cheap and better the the e7's. From what everyone says in the 5.0 section I would try and find something else.
__________________
1991 GT- All Stock 1990 LX 5.0- CAI, Shorty headers, flowmaster, Tubular Upper and Lower Control arms, Tokico HP series, Eibach Springs |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
1967 Mustang Coupe 302 4V
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 184
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Im just picking from a pile, they're $50 a piece. I just wanna pick the best out of the pile. Gt40Ps are 6X as expensive, I checked.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
91 GT 90 LX 5.0
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: youngstown, ohio
Posts: 1,025
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
oh alright, well hopefully some one comes in with more experience then i have to help you haha
__________________
1991 GT- All Stock 1990 LX 5.0- CAI, Shorty headers, flowmaster, Tubular Upper and Lower Control arms, Tokico HP series, Eibach Springs |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 718
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
1987 E7TE heads on a 1968 289 block?
Don't mean to hijack your thread, but I will be doing something very similar with my 289, so maybe we can help each other out. Keep in mind your block is a flat tapit cam design and the heads you are considering are from a roller cam block. I believe Ford switched the 302 in 1985 or there abouts. So will the heads work, I believe so, can you just bolt them on, I don't think so. That's where the both of use need some clerification.
I think we may need to gut the heads, replace the new rockers, and springs with the old style ones. Keep the valve guides, the guide seals, and the valves themselves. I am not sure which push rods to use, do we use the old ones or the new ones or neither do to length or are they the same length. What bolts do we use to bolt the heads down with? Does it matter the physical head profiles seem identical. So without saying which ones are better I will give you some spec on the heads, basically there aint much difference, the stock Factory 302 heads are not much to write home about (225 hp at 4,200 rpm and 300 lb-ft of torque at 3,000). Keep in mind the combustion chamber capacity is like plus/minus 5 depending on what spec charts / tables you look at. 71-76 302 Head Specs Combustion Chamber - 58.2 Intake - 1.78 Exhaust - 1.45 87-93 Head Specs Combustion Chamber - 62 Intake - 1.78 Exhaust - 1.46 97-98 GT-40P Explorer Head Specs Combustion Chamber - 58-60 cc Intake - 1.84 Exhaust - 1.46 In my opinion if you are after stock heads the ones to get would be the high compression 63-67 289 ones, LOL (not listed above) and no these are not even the Hi-Po ones. Keep in mind it's not about which stock heads are better than the others, there is more than one way to skin a cat. You could take the E7TE heads and port and polish them, plus the intake and exhaust manifolds and get some good flow that way. Just an idea, research porting and polishing, it may be a low cost alternative to aftermarket heads. Last edited by Gregski; April 24th, 2011 at 11:59 PM. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Enthusiast
'95 GT
Was probably faster before I got it.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 861
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
GT40P's may be more expensive, but regular GT40's aren't (generally) and they'll offer better performance than both the old heads and the E7's, but not the P's. And the regular 40's are more common to boot.
__________________
Its red, long, and comes with an 8 foot bed attached. Wanna come play with it? ![]()
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
1967 Mustang Coupe 302 4V
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 184
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
It sounds like the E7TEs aren't worth the trouble, I'll most likely swap the 78 351Ws for some 73-76 302 heads since they'll have the hardened valve seats. One day when I buy a different daily driver, I'll make this thing into a beast and port it out... unless they need to be ported out
![]() I'll see what else Mike has and post an update on the *67 302 swap* thread tomorrow
__________________
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Regular
1967 Mustang Coupe 302 4V
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 184
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Lost in the 60's
1968 GT 500 Super Snake
12.6 @ 114.3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sapulpa Oklahoma
Posts: 2,053
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
The heads do not care if the the cam is a roller.
The newer heads also have harden seats in them, A big plus. The newer roller heads have better spring in them. The newer heads are less likely to need to be rebuilt. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
1967 Mustang Coupe 302 4V
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 184
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Today I swapped the 78 351s for some 69 302s. They're C9OEs. Atleast his way i can use regular 302 head bolts and port them one day when I wanna beef it up. Plus they have adjustable rockers
__________________
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 718
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
![]() Do I really need to have hardened seats... |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Regular
1967 Mustang Coupe 302 4V
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 184
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,572
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
E7s are not good heads, but they will just bolt on. As far as the mentioning of pushrods, there is no way to answer that. The worst mistake you can make is to just slap some pushrods in it. Any time you change heads, or valvetrain components, it is necessary to measure for your pushrod length. Valvetrain geometry is crucial for making power, and engine life. Always always always measure. So, you can not reuse your pushrods, when you change the heads.
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Regular
1967 Mustang Coupe 302 4V
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 184
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Does anyone know the pushrod length for a C9OE? I was told it should be the same as the 75 351W heads that came one it, assuming I'm still going to use a 351 cam/firing order
__________________
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Enthusiast
'95 GT
Was probably faster before I got it.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 861
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Like 69FB said, you should just measure that way you know for certain the proper pushrod sizes.
__________________
Its red, long, and comes with an 8 foot bed attached. Wanna come play with it? ![]()
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 718
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Call Summit talk to their tech support, whacha got to loose.
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Enthusiast
'95 GT
Was probably faster before I got it.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 861
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
+1
__________________
Its red, long, and comes with an 8 foot bed attached. Wanna come play with it? ![]()
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,572
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,572
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Double post
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player Last edited by 69fastback; April 27th, 2011 at 08:50 AM. |
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
6.824@101.61
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 5,572
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Straight from comp cams website.
COMP CamsŪ Pushrod Tech - CPG Nation Forum http://www.compcams.com/Products/CC-'Pushrods'-0.aspx
__________________
./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ |___| ......... |___| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/classic-mustangs/215384-1987-e7te-heads-1976-302-block.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Thread 1987 E7TE heads on a 1976 302 block? | Forums at Modded Mustangs | Page 2 | BoardReader | This thread | Refback | October 15th, 2011 06:33 AM | |
Threads Similar to: 1987 E7TE heads on a 1976 302 block?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| E7TE Heads | GoD36 | 5.0 Mustangs | 5 | April 13th, 2011 09:55 PM |
| Max Hp for stock 1987 5.0 block | Bettsie | 5.0 Mustangs | 3 | October 28th, 2010 09:42 PM |
| D8OE and E7TE heads on the same motor. LMAO! | 98roush | 5.0 Mustangs | 1 | June 11th, 2009 01:13 AM |
| E7TE Heads on 86 Block | Devilman | 5.0 Mustangs | 17 | May 21st, 2009 03:14 PM |
| 1976 ford mustang II Help Quick | stang94 | 5.0 Mustangs | 5 | June 21st, 2007 11:16 PM |