64 1/2 FASTBACK

dragracer404 · September 3rd, 2007, 07:45 PM

So I read on here and some other place that there is no such thing is a 64 1/2 fastback, that the first fastback was in 65. I am looking to buy this one mustang in prestine condition that is a fastback, and title says 64. Why do people say they don't make them in 64??

HMUSN · September 3rd, 2007, 07:46 PM

only a coup and a vert made in 64.

dragracer404 · September 3rd, 2007, 07:54 PM

Why are they saying the title says 64 then? They said its a 64 1/2.

BWAL · September 3rd, 2007, 08:16 PM

the car came out in mid 1964 hence the "1964 1/2"

technically the car is a 1964, so thats why it is titled as one..

BWAL · September 3rd, 2007, 08:16 PM

and yes, HMUSN is correct, no fastback until 1965

dragracer404 · September 3rd, 2007, 11:42 PM

I'd say the car is a 64 if it says 64 on the title. Meaning they made fastbacks for 64 mustangs. :wink

Drick · September 4th, 2007, 12:11 AM

They never made 64 fastbacks acually they never even really made a true 64 mustang they were introduced in mid 64 and all of there vin tags will read 65 but we have all come to no the ones that were produced before october of 64 as 641/2 but yet when they were first made ford refered to them as 65 models even if your title says its a 64 fastback the title is misprinted. The fastback wasnt realesed untill the very begining of the year in 65 I belive.

BWAL · September 4th, 2007, 05:16 AM

Originally Posted by dragracer404

I'd say the car is a 64 if it says 64 on the title. Meaning they made fastbacks for 64 mustangs. :wink

are you seriously trying to argue, saying that there were fastback mustangs for the 1964 year model?

:stupid

nba1341 · September 4th, 2007, 05:22 AM

you must be retarded it you think there was a 1964 fastback

they might have been some in production in 1964 but werent released to public till 1965

tnknepp · September 4th, 2007, 12:24 PM

It may be a 64.5 fastback that somebody has made from a coupe. I've heard of people doing that (not necessarily w/a 64.5; but on other Mustangs). Why somebody would do that; I don't know. Must have more money than sense.

coolhand · September 4th, 2007, 01:14 PM

My stock Fast back was produced in August 64, Dad bought it new
and I have all paperwok..

...DMV lists it as 64..paper work
from Stone MT. ford in Ga lists it as 64..

..has Falcon
parts on it as well..V/R is falcon part #...

More? came from the factory with NO BACK up lights..No holes!
lists as 64 Mustand 2+2..Not a GT..No openings for rear pipes..But came with 271 HP engine and TP/L trans . Now any questions?

My Mod 65 Fat-Back was made in Jan 65..DMV lists as 65..

nba1341 · September 4th, 2007, 05:09 PM

you guys do realize they release cars like 4-8 months before the year actually begins

which means being produced in august 64 and sold means it would be sold as a 65...

never have i ever heard of a 1964 1/2 fastback

460brevill · September 4th, 2007, 07:05 PM

in my trade (mechanic)any car built after the 6th month is next years car.

coolhand · September 4th, 2007, 10:54 PM

was titled..sold from Ford as a 64. Has 64 style rolled Hood..l

I wil post the VIN and you run it.

Horseshoeing · September 5th, 2007, 07:28 AM

You might have something ford said that didn't do. Ford says they didn't make a 1964 fastback.

69fastback · September 5th, 2007, 09:48 AM

A lot of cars "slipped" through production lines back then. Officially Ford didn't make the fastback until 1965, and my guess would be the ones out there are early production 1965s that were still getting titled as 1964s. There were lots of mistakes made like that on old Fords.

September 3rd, 2007, 07:45 PM	#1
dragracer404 Newbie Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3 iTrader: 0 reviews	64 1/2 FASTBACK So I read on here and some other place that there is no such thing is a 64 1/2 fastback, that the first fastback was in 65. I am looking to buy this one mustang in prestine condition that is a fastback, and title says 64. Why do people say they don't make them in 64??

September 3rd, 2007, 07:46 PM	#2
HMUSN Doc 1986 SVO 48.47@ 12.58 Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 37,050 iTrader: 11 reviews	only a coup and a vert made in 64. __________________

September 3rd, 2007, 08:16 PM	#4
BWAL MSTRB8N & MDR8N 2021 Mustang V15 Quad Turbo with nawz Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: On The Shaft Posts: 19,659 Blog Entries: 2 iTrader: 4 reviews	the car came out in mid 1964 hence the "1964 1/2" technically the car is a 1964, so thats why it is titled as one.. __________________ MM 1 am boner crew Cars and mod list in garage i like veiny meat sliding between my buttcheeks

September 3rd, 2007, 08:16 PM	#5
BWAL MSTRB8N & MDR8N 2021 Mustang V15 Quad Turbo with nawz Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: On The Shaft Posts: 19,659 Blog Entries: 2 iTrader: 4 reviews	and yes, HMUSN is correct, no fastback until 1965 __________________ MM 1 am boner crew Cars and mod list in garage i like veiny meat sliding between my buttcheeks

September 4th, 2007, 05:22 AM	#9
nba1341 Banned 1965 Mustang Fastback Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Los Angeles, Cal Posts: 24,982 Posts: 2,194 iTrader: 0 reviews	you must be retarded it you think there was a 1964 fastback they might have been some in production in 1964 but werent released to public till 1965 __________________ I'm a good boy now. [COLOR=red][B]slow car club - crew member 7 of 9 [COLOR=White]Mood: Cool :cool: [/COLOR][/B] [/COLOR]

September 3rd, 2007, 07:54 PM	#3
dragracer404 Newbie Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3 iTrader: 0 reviews	Why are they saying the title says 64 then? They said its a 64 1/2.

September 3rd, 2007, 11:42 PM	#6
dragracer404 Newbie Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3 iTrader: 0 reviews	I'd say the car is a 64 if it says 64 on the title. Meaning they made fastbacks for 64 mustangs. :wink

September 4th, 2007, 12:11 AM	#7
Drick Big timin' in a small town 2004 FX4 F150, 86 GT Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Gods country. Nordern Michigan eh Posts: 14,336 iTrader: 1 reviews	They never made 64 fastbacks acually they never even really made a true 64 mustang they were introduced in mid 64 and all of there vin tags will read 65 but we have all come to no the ones that were produced before october of 64 as 641/2 but yet when they were first made ford refered to them as 65 models even if your title says its a 64 fastback the title is misprinted. The fastback wasnt realesed untill the very begining of the year in 65 I belive.

September 4th, 2007, 12:24 PM	#10
tnknepp Regular 1967 Mustange Coupe, 200i Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Indiana Posts: 72 iTrader: 0 reviews	It may be a 64.5 fastback that somebody has made from a coupe. I've heard of people doing that (not necessarily w/a 64.5; but on other Mustangs). Why somebody would do that; I don't know. Must have more money than sense.

September 4th, 2007, 01:14 PM	#11
coolhand Newbie Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 25 iTrader: 0 reviews	My stock Fast back was produced in August 64, Dad bought it new and I have all paperwok.. ...DMV lists it as 64..paper work from Stone MT. ford in Ga lists it as 64.. ..has Falcon parts on it as well..V/R is falcon part #... More? came from the factory with NO BACK up lights..No holes! lists as 64 Mustand 2+2..Not a GT..No openings for rear pipes..But came with 271 HP engine and TP/L trans . Now any questions? My Mod 65 Fat-Back was made in Jan 65..DMV lists as 65..

September 4th, 2007, 05:09 PM	#12
nba1341 Banned 1965 Mustang Fastback Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Los Angeles, Cal Posts: 24,982 Posts: 2,194 iTrader: 0 reviews	you guys do realize they release cars like 4-8 months before the year actually begins which means being produced in august 64 and sold means it would be sold as a 65... never have i ever heard of a 1964 1/2 fastback __________________ I'm a good boy now. [COLOR=red][B]slow car club - crew member 7 of 9 [COLOR=White]Mood: Cool :cool: [/COLOR][/B] [/COLOR]

September 4th, 2007, 07:05 PM	#13
460brevill Hardcore Enthusiast Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Farmville VA Posts: 1,327 iTrader: 0 reviews	in my trade (mechanic)any car built after the 6th month is next years car. __________________ i sixing 200 six with 300 hp.

September 4th, 2007, 10:54 PM	#14
coolhand Newbie Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 25 iTrader: 0 reviews	was titled..sold from Ford as a 64. Has 64 style rolled Hood..l I wil post the VIN and you run it.

September 5th, 2007, 07:28 AM	#15
Horseshoeing Classic Moderator Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: GA Posts: 4,177 iTrader: 0 reviews	You might have something ford said that didn't do. Ford says they didn't make a 1964 fastback. __________________ Classic Mustangs are the best! Get one.

September 5th, 2007, 09:48 AM	#16
69fastback Premium Member 1969 Mustang Mach 1 6.824@101.61 Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving Posts: 5,572 iTrader: 0 reviews	A lot of cars "slipped" through production lines back then. Officially Ford didn't make the fastback until 1965, and my guess would be the ones out there are early production 1965s that were still getting titled as 1964s. There were lots of mistakes made like that on old Fords. __________________ ./___ _ ____ ___ \. ( ]]] _ _ O _ _ [[[ ) \_ o _ _____ _ o _/ \|___\| ......... \|___\| http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyYU3...e_gdata_player

Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links
Ford Mustang Forum Advertisement

Threads Similar to: 64 1/2 FASTBACK
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
buying a 66 fastback v8	mustang-art	Classic Mustangs	5	September 8th, 2009 08:45 PM
66 fastback	gooberhead320	The Clubhouse	34	July 17th, 2007 01:19 AM
coupe to fastback?	66roxanne4sho	Classic Mustangs	17	July 6th, 2007 10:52 AM
429 72 Fastback Question	jbolivar	Classic Mustangs	4	May 14th, 2007 09:03 AM
Trying to buy another fastback	69fastback	Classic Mustangs	12	January 31st, 2007 04:28 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:24 PM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs : Ford Mustang Forums - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.