| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools |
|
|
#81
|
|
|
Lost in the 60's
1968 GT 500 Super Snake
12.6 @ 114.3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sapulpa Oklahoma
Posts: 2,053
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
We are talking about Stroked 302.The most common is a 347 Stroker Motor.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#82 | |
|
Regular
|
__________________
Your love of the Halfling's leaf has clearly Slowed your mind. -Saruman, Fellowship of the Ring I am the Lizard King, I can do anything. -Jim Morrison, The Doors |
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Regular
1965 Coupe
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 356
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
it's a bit tall, so you can hide it if you have a raised scoop or something. and that's only for the 64.5, 65s and 66s, i believe the 67+ will fit it without any problems.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#84 | |
|
Lost in the 60's
1968 GT 500 Super Snake
12.6 @ 114.3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sapulpa Oklahoma
Posts: 2,053
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I have done it 2 times. But !!! I REALLY Dont like it in there. I sure do hope I have cleared this up. I do like a 347 in a 1965 / 66. Unless We remove the shock towers Then we can do any thing. I am building a 1965 Coupe for Pinks All out, with a Mustang II front suspension and no shock towers with a 429 SCJ and C6. That is really a neat ride. I will post photos of this build.
__________________
MustangOne's Car's![]() How to post Photos in Your Thread. Vote for your Favorite Ride of the month, Every Month Modded Mustangs Facebook Last edited by MustangOne; May 1st, 2008 at 09:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Regular
|
Yeah, I wanted to do the Mustang II front suspension, but my Uncle got his damn panties in a bunch when I proposed the idea and said, "Now now here Son, you leave that car all original and it'll be worth something someday." I understand the mentality, but I don't plan on ever selling it, and I DO plan on driving the living shit out of it. Not driving your car is like having a sexy wife and not fucking her.
__________________
Your love of the Halfling's leaf has clearly Slowed your mind. -Saruman, Fellowship of the Ring I am the Lizard King, I can do anything. -Jim Morrison, The Doors |
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Farmville VA
Posts: 1,327
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
why fool with the 351 and no room to work,when you can drop a 302 in and make a lot of horses?
__________________
i sixing 200 six with 300 hp. |
|
|
|
#87 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
There are guys that put 429s and 460s in these cars with stock front suspensions.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#88 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
I'm curious as to how much power your "highend race motors" make and what cast iron heads you use? I don't agree with your head gasket statement about aluminum heads. I've run aluminum heads for years and never had a head gasket failure that wasn't attributed to a lean condition from nitrous oxide or boost. I've never had a head gasket fail on any of my naturally aspirated engines. I mostly use Cometic gaskets and have the block and heads machined per Cometics recomendations but I also use Felpro 1011s on small blocks with no problems. Hundreds of factory production engines are using aluminum heads and/or blocks these days too with no head gasket problems.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Newbie
1965 Mustang Convertible
est. 12.0 sec
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Orange County California
Posts: 3
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Save a little more money and do what I did with my stock bottom end 289....Throw a Vortech Supercharger kit on it and receive (depending upon other mods) 330 rwhp-350 rwhp. Thats near or on 400 crank hp you wanted.
I love the look I get from people when I tell them its a supercharged 289! But I will forwarn you, throwing in that kind of HP and Torque will cause you to upgrade many more areas (suspension, brakes, cooling...and the list goes on!) than you first anticipated. But my friend...its all worth it if your willing to jump in! Good Luck
__________________
The louder, the faster, the better...
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/classic-mustangs/57532-400hp-289-a.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| 400hp 289? - Page 5 | This thread | Refback | May 1st, 2008 08:57 PM | |
Threads Similar to: 400hp 289?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ---Have 5 grand want 400hp--- | WTFJayJay | 5.0 Mustangs | 117 | August 27th, 2007 05:12 PM |
| new m3 v8 powered...400hp+ | jat | 2005 - 2010 | 7 | April 21st, 2007 11:11 AM |