Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Classic Mustangs

Discussing Intake help in the Classic Mustangs Forum. I posted this in tech, but it hasn't seen much action, so I'll ...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old May 1st, 2008, 12:38 AM   #1
Enthusiast
 
69fastback's Avatar
 
1969 Mustang Mach 1
OLDNSLO
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 643
Default

Intake help


I posted this in tech, but it hasn't seen much action, so I'll try it here.

I'm in the process of building a 408. I'll be using a custom grind, hydraulic, roller cam, and AFR 205s. I'm going to try and keep the compression at no more than 10.5:1, and I plan on twisting around 6200-6300 rpms.

It's mainly going to be a street machine, that will go to the track a few times a year, and it's not a daily driver, but I will be driving it quite a bit. Probably 10,000-12,000 miles per year, and it's a manual transmission.


I'm looking for the right intake, and I want to keep the stock hood. I have a Weiand stealth on the 351W right now, and I was wondering if that would be a good choice for the increase in cubic inches? It's supposed to be rated from idle to 6800 RPMs on the 351, but I figure with those heads, and cubes it may not be sufficient for anything over 6000 RPMs. Thoughts?

What are the thoughts on a single plane for what I'm doing? I know a lot of people don't like single planes for the street, but I already have hood clearnace issues, so something like an RPM air gap is out of the question, so would a single plane be a good compromise?


I would really like to see in the 500hp range out of this. Any help is appreciated.
 
Old May 1st, 2008, 04:10 PM   #2
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Farmville VA
Posts: 835
Default

that weiand should be fine.the most it could cost is a gasket set if you dont like it.i would try it.i would also port match it.
__________________
i sixing 200 six with 300 hp.
 
Old May 1st, 2008, 11:34 PM   #3
June 08 ROTM
 
MustangOne's Avatar
 
1968 GT 500 Super Snake
12.6 @ 114.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sapulpa Oklahoma
Posts: 438
Default

This is the one we use on our stroker motors, Very Nice all around performance.



Edelbrock Performer RPM Air-Gap Intake Manifolds
Intake Manifold, Performer RPM Air Gap, Dual Plane, Aluminum, Natural, Square Bore, Ford, 351W, Each

$254.95

If you like you can come by and Drive the 408 Stoker 1970 Twister we built.
This Next week we are building another 427 Stroker motor.

Will will be firing it up Monday the 5/11
__________________
<a href=http://Mustang1.Com target=_blank>Mustang1.Com</a>

www.Mustang1.Com
 
Old May 2nd, 2008, 04:51 PM   #4
Enthusiast
 
69fastback's Avatar
 
1969 Mustang Mach 1
OLDNSLO
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 643
Default

Originally Posted by MustangOne View Post
This is the one we use on our stroker motors, Very Nice all around performance.



Edelbrock Performer RPM Air-Gap Intake Manifolds
Intake Manifold, Performer RPM Air Gap, Dual Plane, Aluminum, Natural, Square Bore, Ford, 351W, Each

$254.95

If you like you can come by and Drive the 408 Stoker 1970 Twister we built.
This Next week we are building another 427 Stroker motor.

Will will be firing it up Monday the 5/11
Originally Posted by 69fastback View Post
What are the thoughts on a single plane for what I'm doing? I know a lot of people don't like single planes for the street, but I already have hood clearnace issues, so something like an RPM air gap is out of the question, so would a single plane be a good compromise?

I agree that the RPM air gap is a great intake for what I'm doing, but it will not fit under a stock hood, and I will not put a cowl hood on my car. That's why I am considering a single plane. My dilema is would I be better off with the more broad range the Stealth would give me, but be limited on RPMs? I really don't want to have to have it WOT to get into the power, like I'm afraid a single plane would do.
 
Old May 2nd, 2008, 05:01 PM   #5
Feb 08 ROTM
 
Darrell's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 7,046
Default

Originally Posted by 69fastback View Post
I posted this in tech, but it hasn't seen much action, so I'll try it here.

I'm in the process of building a 408. I'll be using a custom grind, hydraulic, roller cam, and AFR 205s. I'm going to try and keep the compression at no more than 10.5:1, and I plan on twisting around 6200-6300 rpms.

It's mainly going to be a street machine, that will go to the track a few times a year, and it's not a daily driver, but I will be driving it quite a bit. Probably 10,000-12,000 miles per year, and it's a manual transmission.


I'm looking for the right intake, and I want to keep the stock hood. I have a Weiand stealth on the 351W right now, and I was wondering if that would be a good choice for the increase in cubic inches? It's supposed to be rated from idle to 6800 RPMs on the 351, but I figure with those heads, and cubes it may not be sufficient for anything over 6000 RPMs. Thoughts?

What are the thoughts on a single plane for what I'm doing? I know a lot of people don't like single planes for the street, but I already have hood clearnace issues, so something like an RPM air gap is out of the question, so would a single plane be a good compromise?


I would really like to see in the 500hp range out of this. Any help is appreciated.

A Victor Jr. should fit under the stock hood. I had one on a 351W in my 65 Mustang and it cleared the stock hood. A single plane intake isn't going to have any effect on streetability as long as the total combination is matched. You will be leaving power under the table if you put a dual plane intake on it. I've run many single plane intakes on street cars with no problems. A good combination is going to run great regardless of what intake is on it. People say the same thing about high stall converters which are plenty streetable as well.
__________________
Racing in memory of Dave Bandt 11/19/69 - 3/23/08
"he's traded his wheels for wings"

Professor of Natural Aspiration
Thanks to: Artie at Trick Flow, Dave at Team Z Motorsports, Brian at Total Engine Airflow and Harold at Furo Racecraft
 
Old May 3rd, 2008, 11:54 AM   #6
Enthusiast
 
69fastback's Avatar
 
1969 Mustang Mach 1
OLDNSLO
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 643
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
A Victor Jr. should fit under the stock hood. I had one on a 351W in my 65 Mustang and it cleared the stock hood. A single plane intake isn't going to have any effect on streetability as long as the total combination is matched. You will be leaving power under the table if you put a dual plane intake on it. I've run many single plane intakes on street cars with no problems. A good combination is going to run great regardless of what intake is on it. People say the same thing about high stall converters which are plenty streetable as well.

I've heard a lot of people say that single planes won't affect streetability, but I've never actually had one. It seems like you get a different answer from everybody you talk to. I honestly think that will be the best way to go, because of the clearance issues with a stock hood.
 
Old May 3rd, 2008, 12:00 PM   #7
Feb 08 ROTM
 
Darrell's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 7,046
Default

Originally Posted by 69fastback View Post
I've heard a lot of people say that single planes won't affect streetability, but I've never actually had one. It seems like you get a different answer from everybody you talk to. I honestly think that will be the best way to go, because of the clearance issues with a stock hood.
The problem with different answers is 70% of the people that give advice on the internet have no experience with the advice that they are giving.
__________________
Racing in memory of Dave Bandt 11/19/69 - 3/23/08
"he's traded his wheels for wings"

Professor of Natural Aspiration
Thanks to: Artie at Trick Flow, Dave at Team Z Motorsports, Brian at Total Engine Airflow and Harold at Furo Racecraft
 
Old May 3rd, 2008, 12:15 PM   #8
Regular
 
1973 Coupe Mustang
pft if i know
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Defiance, Ohio
Posts: 102
Default

i run a single plane intake on my 302 in my 73, never had any problem with performance or anything for that matter. an i dont think i have noticed any sufficent rpm range difference from a one plane intake to an dual plane intake
 
Old May 3rd, 2008, 12:34 PM   #9
June 08 ROTM
 
MustangOne's Avatar
 
1968 GT 500 Super Snake
12.6 @ 114.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sapulpa Oklahoma
Posts: 438
Default

Originally Posted by 69fastback View Post
I agree that the RPM air gap is a great intake for what I'm doing, but it will not fit under a stock hood, and I will not put a cowl hood on my car. That's why I am considering a single plane. My dilema is would I be better off with the more broad range the Stealth would give me, but be limited on RPMs? I really don't want to have to have it WOT to get into the power, like I'm afraid a single plane would do.
I have this Air Gap on a 1970 351W Mach1 and 1970 351W Fastback both use stock hoods. They clear by 1/4 "

The Nice about when I say somthing you can come over a see and touch and Drive what you are looking to do.
__________________
<a href=http://Mustang1.Com target=_blank>Mustang1.Com</a>

www.Mustang1.Com
 
Old May 3rd, 2008, 12:56 PM   #10
Enthusiast
 
69fastback's Avatar
 
1969 Mustang Mach 1
OLDNSLO
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 643
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell View Post
The problem with different answers is 70% of the people that give advice on the internet have no experience with the advice that they are giving.
Yeah that's why I asked. I've built a few different engines for my cars in the past, but I have never ran a single plane intake before, so I don't know what it's like.

Originally Posted by MustangOne View Post
I have this Air Gap on a 1970 351W Mach1 and 1970 351W Fastback both use stock hoods. They clear by 1/4 "

The Nice about when I say somthing you can come over a see and touch and Drive what you are looking to do.

Really? What kind of air cleaner are you running. I have a 1" drop down, with a 14" air filter, and the lid hits the studs on my scoop with the Weiand intake that's on there now. I just don't see any way an air gap will fit.
 
Old May 3rd, 2008, 02:40 PM   #11
June 08 ROTM
 
MustangOne's Avatar
 
1968 GT 500 Super Snake
12.6 @ 114.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sapulpa Oklahoma
Posts: 438
Default

__________________
<a href=http://Mustang1.Com target=_blank>Mustang1.Com</a>

www.Mustang1.Com
 
Old May 3rd, 2008, 02:44 PM   #12
June 08 ROTM
 
MustangOne's Avatar
 
1968 GT 500 Super Snake
12.6 @ 114.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sapulpa Oklahoma
Posts: 438
Default

That 408 Stroker Runs So Damn Hard.
TKO 5 speed
Cal-traks
Curry 9" 31 Spline rear end 3:55 Gears Eaton Traction Lock

If you like, You can test Drive this car Next Weekend.
__________________
<a href=http://Mustang1.Com target=_blank>Mustang1.Com</a>

www.Mustang1.Com
 
Old May 3rd, 2008, 03:08 PM   #13
Enthusiast
 
69fastback's Avatar
 
1969 Mustang Mach 1
OLDNSLO
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 643
Default

That's basically the same air cleaner setup I have, and like I said, it hits the studs on my scoop now.

I would love to drive it, but I'll be in LAX next weekend
 
Old May 3rd, 2008, 03:11 PM   #14
June 08 ROTM
 
MustangOne's Avatar
 
1968 GT 500 Super Snake
12.6 @ 114.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sapulpa Oklahoma
Posts: 438
Default

Are you useing the 1" spacer Still? This one we are not. And we are using the same hood set you are. And it clears by a 1/4" Runs Great.
__________________
<a href=http://Mustang1.Com target=_blank>Mustang1.Com</a>

www.Mustang1.Com
 
Old May 3rd, 2008, 04:18 PM   #15
Enthusiast
 
69fastback's Avatar
 
1969 Mustang Mach 1
OLDNSLO
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 643
Default

I have a Holley street avenger carb, and no spacer. I plan on driving up some weekend and checking out your shop. I'll probably drive my car up there, and get some ideas from you.

Do you guys do your own body work there? I'm no good at body work, and my car is getting some rust in the usual places, and is going to need some work in the future.
 
Old May 3rd, 2008, 08:36 PM   #16
June 08 ROTM
 
MustangOne's Avatar
 
1968 GT 500 Super Snake
12.6 @ 114.3
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sapulpa Oklahoma
Posts: 438
Default

We have 3 Trusted Body Shops that do all of our work. We have at least 12 cars a years paint at this time.
__________________
<a href=http://Mustang1.Com target=_blank>Mustang1.Com</a>

www.Mustang1.Com
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Intake help
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
short ram intake or cold air intake????? j/w Stangbro8994 V6 Mustangs 32 September 18th, 2008 08:20 PM
S&B intake my intake on them ..........? RanGer498 Parts 3 May 7th, 2008 12:05 AM
Aftermarket intake vs Cobra intake... Brent Russell 5.0 Mustangs 11 April 27th, 2008 10:35 PM
95' Mustang 5.0 HO intake swap for 93 cobra intake... stang9587 5.0 Mustangs 1 April 3rd, 2007 05:20 AM
Need help using a 5.0 upper intake on a 5.8 lower intake Washington5.0 5.0 Mustangs 4 March 9th, 2007 01:54 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.