| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
8.8' Rear end vs. 9" rear end
I'm looking to change out my 8" rear end in the next couple of months. I've heard that the Ford 9" rear end is one of the most durable rear ends ever made. I'm looking to run a 3.73 gear, and wanted to know if there was any benefit to going to an 8.8" rear end......beside the fact that they are more plentiful.
Also, are there any modifications needed if I swapped my 8" for either the 9" or the 8.8" rear end. Thanks, Jeff |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
Why do you want to get rid of the 8"? I wouldn't change it unless you are making alot of horsepower. I know first hand those 8" rear ends will handle a good amount of power in stock form. Are you sure its an 8"? They are very similar to a 9" too with a drop out center section.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Classic Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 4,177
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
You can get a bolt on 9" for about $600 at the junkyard. A 9" is easy to swap gears. If yo want a 9", get a a lincoln Versailles rearend. I am guess it will fit you car not knowing what it is.
__________________
Classic Mustangs are the best! Get one. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Enthusiast
|
just go to http://currieenterprises.com/ and check these rear ends out
__________________
The LS1 was finally subjected to a paternity test, and it's daddy was to '03 Cobra |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Premium Member
1969 Mustang Mach 1
7.324@94.61 N/A
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma jackass, get to driving
Posts: 4,528
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Doesn't the 8" rear end swap gears just like the 9"?
__________________
![]() ProSystems Aeromotive TFS MSD Bullet Induction Solutions PA Moser |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dayton, OHIO
Posts: 158
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Versailles rear ends are nice if you can find them, 9" with disc brakes. I picked mine up in the salvage yard for $125 ready to bolt in. It came with a Trac Loc too! 67-70 Mustang rear ends are all interchangeable. If you happen to have any of those years its worth knowing. 65-73 Bronco rear ends are the same width as a versailles rear but take more to get bolted under a Mustang.
__________________
66 Coupe, Supercharged 408 Clevor, Viper T56, Cobra IRS 66 Coupe, Supercharged 03 Cobra drivetrain and suspension (project) 03 Viper, Supercharged |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 70
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Dos anyone know what axles are interchangeable
Dos anyone know what axles are interchangeable with the 2001 mustangs or better what cars use the 8.8 or 9 axle that would fit the 2001
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Lost in the 60's
1968 GT 500 Super Snake
12.6 @ 114.3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sapulpa Oklahoma
Posts: 1,943
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Farmville VA
Posts: 1,327
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
the 8 inch and the 9 inch lool alike.both will take a lot of punisment.if you are not punching 600 hp,leave the 8 in there and build it.
__________________
i sixing 200 six with 300 hp. |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Regular
|
The 8 inch is a decent rear-end. But there's no breaking a Ford 9 inch. If you do, I'll buy you a new one. Lol.
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Regular
|
I saw a nine inch broke once, it was shattered in the back. It was a 65 fastback with what I was told original 289 dbl 4 barrel carbs on racing slicks.
__________________
Your love of the Halfling's leaf has clearly Slowed your mind. -Saruman, Fellowship of the Ring I am the Lizard King, I can do anything. -Jim Morrison, The Doors |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Newbie
2004 3.9L V6
15.1
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 43
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Yes both rear ends have pumpkins that can be switched out. It is a beautiful thing for race day.
__________________
Race what ya Brought
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Newbie
2004 3.9L V6
15.1
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 43
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
The 9 inch is one of the best rear ends ever made. It is the basis for most racing rear ends used today. If you get one for your car it will bolt right in without any modifications for the most part. As long as you get a basic one for your car there are no mods.
__________________
Race what ya Brought
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 97
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Waay old, but how does the cost and availability of the 8" compare to the 9"?
I imagine 9" are getting hard to get cheap in the yards. |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Lost in the 60's
1968 GT 500 Super Snake
12.6 @ 114.3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sapulpa Oklahoma
Posts: 1,943
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Why didn't you just make new thread to ask that?
Old Mustang 8" are a lot more plentiful that a old Mustang 9" The 8" came in everything with a 289 or 302 in it. Witch most of all of them had. The 9" came in only high performance Mustangs with 351 or bigger. 8" not rebuilt is $250, 9" not rebuilt is $350 to $450 when you can find them. you can find 9" in trucks and bigger old 70's cars but they are about 2" wider. |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 97
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I have a 9" from a Lincoln in my mustang, I did it for the disc brakes and the posi rear end. If I had to do it over again I would stick to the 8" because on a light car like the Mustang if your not pushing out a lot of hp it seems to be too much un-sprung weight and the car does not handle as nimble
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Lost in the 60's
1968 GT 500 Super Snake
12.6 @ 114.3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sapulpa Oklahoma
Posts: 1,943
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
??? 600 for what? HP, Cost?8", 9", Rebuilt? Not rebuilt? ![]() Is the question will a 8" hold 600 HP? Built yes. Without Drag slicks. A 9" is a Lot better though. |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 97
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
What years did the late models use an 8.8 rear, or are they still using them, and what are they rated for in HP and TQ?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 8.8' Rear end vs. 9" rear end
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 8.8" rear end... | singe | V6 Mustangs | 7 | July 26th, 2007 06:40 AM |
| 9" rear end | 69_5.0_stang | Classic Mustangs | 2 | July 26th, 2007 06:25 AM |
| does a 9" rear end fit in a fox? | redalert89 | 5.0 Mustangs | 12 | March 7th, 2007 09:19 PM |
| 7.5 or 8.8" Rear End In My Car? | CyberPrey | V6 Mustangs | 18 | October 29th, 2006 12:55 PM |