Muscle Cars Vs. Compact Cars?? I Need Help Deciding..
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > General Forum > The Clubhouse

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old June 3rd, 2009, 09:16 PM   #1
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Hunt_chevs's Avatar
 
2002 Gt
Not Slow
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SJ-CA, 50-ft elev.
Posts: 1,658
Hunt_chevs is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Muscle Cars Vs. Compact Cars?? I Need Help Deciding..


I Am Writing A Paper And I Need To Know What It Is About The Durablity,power, And Cost-efficency Of Muscle Cars That Makes Them More Desirable In Todays Market As Opposed To Compact Cars.

P.s.i Love Muscle Cars

I appreciate as much info that you can provide! Thank you.
__________________
2k2 Gt Eibach pro kit, bbk cold air, exhaust, 4.10s, 6k hid's

Last edited by Hunt_chevs; June 3rd, 2009 at 09:18 PM. Reason: forgot to write my appreciation
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old June 3rd, 2009, 09:32 PM   #2
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
XectriK's Avatar
 
2000 Ford Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,719
XectriK is just really niceXectriK is just really niceXectriK is just really niceXectriK is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Muscle cars have lineage.

/paper
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2009, 09:40 PM   #3
Bearer of Bad News
 
Fluffy The Rhino's Avatar
 
I has mustang and legacy.
Slower than my Ruger.
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Fuckening
Posts: 2,392
Fluffy The Rhino is a splendid one to beholdFluffy The Rhino is a splendid one to beholdFluffy The Rhino is a splendid one to beholdFluffy The Rhino is a splendid one to beholdFluffy The Rhino is a splendid one to beholdFluffy The Rhino is a splendid one to beholdFluffy The Rhino is a splendid one to beholdFluffy The Rhino is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Cost Efficiency is generally not a determining factor unless you're comparing a muscle car to a large truck. That is, if we're talking about stock vs. stock.

IMO, the appeal of a muscle car over a compact or ecomony car is that of power and looks. You don't see many angry looking compact cars or economy cars...

However, if one is looking for power, buying a muscle car can often times be cheaper than buying a compact and upgrading it just to the point of equaling the power of a stock muscle car. In that case it is more efficient to buy a muscle car.

I'm not sure about durability. I think that is rather subjective. For example, I have had certain problems with my vehicle... fairly minor problems over the past 5 years. Yet there are people with the same car I've got that have had major problems and have babied their cars. This is something I believe you will find with every kind of car out there. With that said, muscle cars are dsigned to be able to handle the power they have, just as a compact is designed to handle what it has. Other factors come into play here, such as the time the vehicle was manufactured. For example, a 2004 Mustang is probably "safer" to purchase than a 1999. The 99 was the first in line of the new edge. Your first run vehicles tend to have the reputation of being the buggiest. Again, some people have had problems, some haven't.
__________________
~MOD NUTSWINGER~
My Tongue Soothes Razorburn



STOPSAYINGFAIL.COM

EVERY FART IS A GAMBLE

Just Think Of Me As A White Blood Cell.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2009, 09:52 PM   #4
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Hunt_chevs's Avatar
 
2002 Gt
Not Slow
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SJ-CA, 50-ft elev.
Posts: 1,658
Hunt_chevs is an unknown quantity at this point
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

thanks
__________________
2k2 Gt Eibach pro kit, bbk cold air, exhaust, 4.10s, 6k hid's
  Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2009, 09:55 PM   #5
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
dude496's Avatar
 
04 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: somewhere
Posts: 1,373
dude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

What is the topic of the paper? Are you just writing on why you would chose a muscle car over an economy car? Or are you writing about why it is more practical to upgrade a muscle car versus an economy car?
  Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2009, 09:59 PM   #6
Priest of the Car Gods
 
ReverendDexter's Avatar
 
Clapped-out '90 GT 'vert
~5.5 seconds off TTOD :(
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 13,233
ReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ReverendDexter
Default

Well, there're some things you have to establish first.

What are you definining as a muscle car? Any domestic car with a V8? Any American sedan using a large displacement engine that is designed to emphasize acceleration at the expense of handling? Something else?

What are you defining as a compact car? Is this merely a size/weight constraint? Do you mean so-called economy cars?

What exactly does "more desirable in today's market" mean? I would argue that sales numbers disagree with you, and that "compact cars" are outselling "muscle cars" in todays market. If you're not using sales figures, how are you quantifying desirability?


With that out of the way, my guess to why muscle cars are more desirable is that they are irresponsible. Owning one shows that you have the disposable income to own one in the first place, to not be concerned with fuel prices and it shows that you aren't chained down to the point of needing a more purpose-oriented vehicle (such as a minivan). It's expressly aimed at the youth market: no family, no mortgage payment, no worries They're just designed to go out and have carefree fun.
__________________

O o
/¯/______________________
|BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!
\_\


Buy my Bronco, special deal for MM folks

Last edited by ReverendDexter; June 3rd, 2009 at 10:02 PM. Reason: Grammar
  Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2009, 10:04 PM   #7
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
dude496's Avatar
 
04 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: somewhere
Posts: 1,373
dude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Question for you, ReverendDexter since you broke it down that far...would you consider a modern mustang, camaro, cts-v,challenger etc..a muscle car? or to even include with that, the nissan gt-r...

I don't know what it is, but when ever I hear muscle car I think nostalgia. Did they have the word "sports car" back then? Just wondering what your opinion on that is.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2009, 10:08 PM   #8
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
XectriK's Avatar
 
2000 Ford Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,719
XectriK is just really niceXectriK is just really niceXectriK is just really niceXectriK is just really nice
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by dude496 View Post
I don't know what it is, but when ever I hear muscle car I think nostalgia. Did they have the word "sports car" back then? Just wondering what your opinion on that is.
The old Jag's were commonly referred to as Sports Cars. Remember that scene from Vanishing Point where the Jaguar was trying to run Kowalski off the road.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2009, 10:14 PM   #9
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
dude496's Avatar
 
04 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: somewhere
Posts: 1,373
dude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by XectriK View Post
The old Jag's were commonly referred to as Sports Cars. Remember that scene from Vanishing Point where the Jaguar was trying to run Kowalski off the road.
So when did the muscle car name die and become a sports car? Was it the gas crisis of 74? Was it the introduction of EPA standards? Just seems like all cars since the mid 70s to present were introduced as sports cars instead of muscle cars. Please correct me if i'm wrong on that one.
  Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2009, 10:22 PM   #10
Priest of the Car Gods
 
ReverendDexter's Avatar
 
Clapped-out '90 GT 'vert
~5.5 seconds off TTOD :(
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 13,233
ReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ReverendDexter
Default

Originally Posted by dude496 View Post
Question for you, ReverendDexter since you broke it down that far...would you consider a modern mustang, camaro, cts-v,challenger etc..a muscle car? or to even include with that, the nissan gt-r...

I don't know what it is, but when ever I hear muscle car I think nostalgia. Did they have the word "sports car" back then? Just wondering what your opinion on that is.
There were definitely sports cars back then, Jaguar E-cars, the Toyota 2000GT, BMW 2002, Ferraris, the Lamborghini Miura, GT-40s... and then all the British roadster types, the MGs, Lotuses, Sprites and such. The only American sports car of the time that I can think of would've been the Corvette.

For your list of cars, I would say that there's definitely modern muscle, and within that modern muscle are modern pony cars. The CTS-V, G8 GT/GXP, Maruader, and '96ish Impala SS would all classify as muscle cars (that FWD Impala SS is an abomination and should be shot, lol).

Anymore I think of pony cars as a subgenre of musclecars, and the Mustang, Camaro, and Challenger certainly all qualify. I think that this newest batch of them more resembles the bloated '71-73 cars than it does the hayday cars of '64-'69, and I fear our generation's 1974.
__________________

O o
/¯/______________________
|BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!
\_\


Buy my Bronco, special deal for MM folks
  Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2009, 10:29 PM   #11
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
dude496's Avatar
 
04 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: somewhere
Posts: 1,373
dude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by ReverendDexter View Post
There were definitely sports cars back then, Jaguar E-cars, the Toyota 2000GT, BMW 2002, Ferraris, the Lamborghini Miura, GT-40s... and then all the British roadster types, the MGs, Lotuses, Sprites and such. The only American sports car of the time that I can think of would've been the Corvette.

For your list of cars, I would say that there's definitely modern muscle, and within that modern muscle are modern pony cars. The CTS-V, G8 GT/GXP, Maruader, and '96ish Impala SS would all classify as muscle cars (that FWD Impala SS is an abomination and should be shot, lol).

Anymore I think of pony cars as a subgenre of musclecars, and the Mustang, Camaro, and Challenger certainly all qualify. I think that this newest batch of them more resembles the bloated '71-73 cars than it does the hayday cars of '64-'69, and I fear our generation's 1974.
Totatly agree about the FWD Impala, maybe thats why GM is filing bankrupcy lol jk.

It just seems like the term muscle car has been reserved to specific cars built 1973 and prior. If I called my 04 mustang gt a muscle car to some random person, they'd probably laugh...sames goes for a newer camaro etc... For some reason the term sports car melted overseas cars and american cars into the same class...when that happened companies like Ferrari, Lamborghini ect became "exotics".

Gotta love how the same word can mean so many different things lol
  Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2009, 10:30 PM   #12
Priest of the Car Gods
 
ReverendDexter's Avatar
 
Clapped-out '90 GT 'vert
~5.5 seconds off TTOD :(
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 13,233
ReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ReverendDexter
Default

Originally Posted by dude496 View Post
So when did the muscle car name die and become a sports car? Was it the gas crisis of 74? Was it the introduction of EPA standards? Just seems like all cars since the mid 70s to present were introduced as sports cars instead of muscle cars. Please correct me if i'm wrong on that one.
I think what's defined as a "sports car" has to do with the motorsports that are popular in Europe versus what's popular in the US.

In the U.S we have drag racing and NASCAR. In Europe they have LeMans and Rally.

To compete in U.S. motorsports, you need a LOT of horsepower, and just enough handling to keep that power going (mostly) straight. Our "sports cars" are going to reflect that. You may not make it through the Nurburgring, but you'll hit the traps in 11 seconds doing 130mph! European cars are just the opposite - power is all well and good, but it's meaningless if you lose all your speed in the twisty bits... 'cause they're ALL twisty bits!
__________________

O o
/¯/______________________
|BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!
\_\


Buy my Bronco, special deal for MM folks
  Reply With Quote
Old June 3rd, 2009, 10:34 PM   #13
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
dude496's Avatar
 
04 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: somewhere
Posts: 1,373
dude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the roughdude496 is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

So I went on youtube and was looking to see if any advertisements in the 80s called the mustang a muscle car or a sports car...well I didnt find an answer, but I did find this and got a kick out of it....

  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Muscle Cars Vs. Compact Cars?? I Need Help Deciding..
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Muscle cars = sport cars?? Mistertribal The Clubhouse 40 May 19th, 2010 08:07 PM
Thursday Forza2 Muscle Cars Monark The Clubhouse 9 October 3rd, 2008 02:48 PM
Muscle cars. AMmuslGT The Clubhouse 44 September 3rd, 2008 01:10 AM
kickin it back to the muscle cars GreenFaleen The Clubhouse 15 August 7th, 2008 12:45 PM
ok.. i like cars and all HMUSN The Clubhouse 36 June 23rd, 2007 10:21 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.