2000 GT Vs. Integra Type-R

blkfordsedan · April 9th, 2011, 01:44 PM

The best part was on the cover. It said: "V8 SMACKDOWN! - Mustang GT VS. Type-R!"

LOL, then when you actually read the article you get the full picture. To be fair to SCC, they initially tried to test them on a bumpy & twisty mountain road and supposedly the Integra was soooo much faster that they decided to move to a smooth test track to "give the Stang a chance". Who knows if that was true or not.

TaintedStang · April 9th, 2011, 01:52 PM

Got a link?

101fng · April 9th, 2011, 03:27 PM

took a second but i found it lol

Unlikely Contenders II - Type R VS Mustang GT, SCC, Nov. 2000

TaintedStang · April 9th, 2011, 03:35 PM

Originally Posted by 101fng

took a second but i found it lol

Unlikely Contenders II - Type R VS Mustang GT, SCC, Nov. 2000

Thanks and Reps!

101fng · April 9th, 2011, 04:07 PM

that article is pretty biased as well. they say they want to be all scientific and objective, yet they chose a mountain road course to determine street manners... idk about you, but 70% of my driving is on the interstate. i might see a mountain road once a year.

they also fail to mention the ITR's weight distribution and how that likely played a part in it's shitty road coarse times. so much for being a "race" car.

01stangV6 · April 9th, 2011, 04:41 PM

My local tire store laughs at me.

XectriK · April 9th, 2011, 05:21 PM

In this article it refers to the mustang as a "pushrod-toting"

101fng · April 9th, 2011, 06:14 PM

ya, i saw that too lol. shows just how much research they actually put into their "tests"

98FireyGT! · April 9th, 2011, 06:24 PM

There's two things I've always noticed with Mustangs vs. Type R's...

Type R's are a limited production vehicle...thus, they are more expensive. You could buy the Mustang and a few mods for the same price as a stock Type R. Omnomnom ITR.

The second thing is, girls dig Mustangs. Most don't even know what a Type R is, and when you tell them it's a Acura/Honda...you get the picture.

Pittbull · April 10th, 2011, 12:21 AM

^ that shit right there is the straight truth right. You pull up and pick a girl up in a acura/Honda you ain't gettin no damn pussy. Mustang however... Her momma be wantin some

WNTS 2RN · April 10th, 2011, 01:00 AM

Originally Posted by XectriK

In this article it refers to the mustang as a "pushrod-toting"

I thought I was the only one who read that. I don't remember any push rods in my 04's mil.

Mineral_Grey_Gt · April 10th, 2011, 01:41 AM

I'm kinda surprised by the performance of the Gt in the spec sheet, It's slalom and stopping distance are better than what I thought they would be.

April 9th, 2011, 01:44 PM	#21
blkfordsedan Enthusiast 2004 Mustang GT Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Nebraska Posts: 684 iTrader: 0 reviews	The best part was on the cover. It said: *"V8 SMACKDOWN! - Mustang GT VS. Type-R!"* LOL, then when you actually read the article you get the full picture. To be fair to SCC, they initially tried to test them on a bumpy & twisty mountain road and supposedly the Integra was soooo much faster that they decided to move to a smooth test track to "give the Stang a chance". Who knows if that was true or not. __________________ -Brian 2004 GT TR3650, MAC Straight Shot CAI, FRPP 70mm, TFS plenum, catted X-pipe, Pypes Violator polished 304SS cat-back, custom tuned by AM/Bama...... 4.10's - coming soon!

April 9th, 2011, 03:27 PM	#23
101fng Banned 2009 Mustang GT Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Johnson City, TN Posts: 6,520 iTrader: 2 reviews	took a second but i found it lol Unlikely Contenders II - Type R VS Mustang GT, SCC, Nov. 2000 __________________

April 9th, 2011, 04:07 PM	#25
101fng Banned 2009 Mustang GT Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Johnson City, TN Posts: 6,520 iTrader: 2 reviews	that article is pretty biased as well. they say they want to be all scientific and objective, yet they chose a mountain road course to determine street manners... idk about you, but 70% of my driving is on the interstate. i might see a mountain road once a year. they also fail to mention the ITR's weight distribution and how that likely played a part in it's shitty road coarse times. so much for being a "race" car. __________________

April 9th, 2011, 04:41 PM	#26
01stangV6 It's not easy being green! 2001 mustang 3.76@306 Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Tennessee Posts: 4,251 iTrader: 0 reviews	My local tire store laughs at me. __________________ 2001 V6 vert....mostly stock but she's my beauty. TOPLESS MUSTANG CLUB

April 9th, 2011, 05:21 PM	#27
XectriK Hardcore Enthusiast 2000 Ford Mustang GT Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Charleston, SC Posts: 2,733 iTrader: 0 reviews	In this article it refers to the mustang as a "pushrod-toting" __________________

April 9th, 2011, 01:52 PM	#22
TaintedStang MM's Taint Shaver! 2003 Mustang GT Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Oregon Posts: 6,540 iTrader: 5 reviews	Got a link?

April 9th, 2011, 06:14 PM	#28
101fng Banned 2009 Mustang GT Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Johnson City, TN Posts: 6,520 iTrader: 2 reviews	ya, i saw that too lol. shows just how much research they actually put into their "tests" __________________

April 9th, 2011, 06:24 PM	#29
98FireyGT! Hardon Enflooziast '94 GT Vert Havn't tried... Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Spokane Posts: 3,460 iTrader: 0 reviews	There's two things I've always noticed with Mustangs vs. Type R's... Type R's are a limited production vehicle...thus, they are more expensive. You could buy the Mustang and a few mods for the same price as a stock Type R. Omnomnom ITR. The second thing is, girls dig Mustangs. Most don't even know what a Type R is, and when you tell them it's a Acura/Honda...you get the picture. __________________ Bridget: 98 Mustang GT - PI Swapped, J-Mod and B&M Shifter...wrapped it around a tree sparing a deer - RIP Sephie: 94 Mustang GT Vert - Full 03 cobra suspension and brakes, Magnaflow catback, K&N drop in filter, timed at 12*, SS brake lines,

April 10th, 2011, 12:21 AM	#30
Pittbull I Post Entirely Way Too Much 2001 Mustang GT If you're not first you're last Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Rock Hill, SC Posts: 5,892 iTrader: 6 reviews	^ that shit right there is the straight truth right. You pull up and pick a girl up in a acura/Honda you ain't gettin no damn pussy. Mustang however... Her momma be wantin some __________________ Stock Rear Springs FOR SALE! PM Me Stock 99-04 GT Exhaust Manifolds FOR SALE! PM Me

April 10th, 2011, 01:41 AM	#32
Mineral_Grey_Gt Regular 2002 Mustang GT Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: California Posts: 420 iTrader: 0 reviews	I'm kinda surprised by the performance of the Gt in the spec sheet, It's slalom and stopping distance are better than what I thought they would be.

Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links
Ford Mustang Forum Advertisement

Threads Similar to: 2000 GT Vs. Integra Type-R
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
2000 Integra wont start. help!!	energiesource	All Other Vehicles	2	November 27th, 2009 11:59 AM
Integra type R?	V6 Stalker	V6 Mustangs	37	October 13th, 2008 11:24 PM
Any teggie fans? new edge gt vs integra type r	flattusmaximus78	The Clubhouse	33	June 20th, 2007 02:36 PM
2000 Mustang V6 vs 2002 Acura RSX Type S	Brianzeke007	V6 Mustangs	28	October 2nd, 2006 01:19 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:23 AM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs : Ford Mustang Forums - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.