|
|
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Blogs | Garage | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Insurance |
| | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
September 20th, 2008, 05:08 PM
|
#1 |
|
RLY SRS
 
|
Mustang Dyno vs Dynojet
Just wondering whats everyone take on it...
Finally Dynoed My Car... I am at the limits of my svt focus pump today on the dyno...I made 382/381 on a Mustang Dyno...I have always heard the pumps were good for 440 or so RWHP but mine is done at 382rwhp/381rwtq...Is this because most of the ratings I have heard with the Focus Pump were tuners who ran dynojets? Is it true that there is a 10% or so difference in power from the Mustang Dyno To The DynoJet? So my 382/381 would be about 420/415 on a dynojet? Am I right in this statment? Just wondering... I searched but found nothing of value on this subject... |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:10 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Resident Bubblehead
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Haymarket, VA
Posts: 6,045
 iTrader: 2 reviews
|
i've always heard that Mustang dynos will read lower than Dynojets because they can be loaded to compensate for real world conditions. that's why they're known as "heart-breaker dynos"...
__________________
 Submariners Do It Deeper Military Crew MM1 (SS)Order of the Bluenose US Navy Veteran
|
|
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:12 PM
|
#3 | |
|
RLY SRS
|
It dont matter to me really either way...Im just wanting to get everyone elses idea... |
|
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:13 PM
|
#4 |
|
Cigar Assassin
2004 Mustang GT
12.88 @ 112
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: A Galaxy Far, Far Away
Posts: 14,083
 iTrader: 10 reviews
   |
your car just sucks @ss man.
__________________
2008 Acura TL-S - 2008 Honda Pilot EX-SE - 2008 Cain F Big Bear Paradox  |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:13 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Resident Bubblehead
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Haymarket, VA
Posts: 6,045
iTrader: 2 reviews
|
i've only ever been dyno'd on a dynojet...
__________________
Submariners Do It Deeper Military Crew MM1 (SS)Order of the Bluenose US Navy Veteran
|
|
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:15 PM
|
#6 | ||
|
RLY SRS
|
|
||
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:15 PM
|
#7 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1998 Mustang V6 SLOW
17.13@80.85
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,127
iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Sorry if this is sorta off topic, what is better than a svt focus pump that would work in our cars?
__________________
 JAKE'S PIITB CREW MEMBER#4 |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:15 PM
|
#8 |
|
Cigar Assassin
2004 Mustang GT
12.88 @ 112
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: A Galaxy Far, Far Away
Posts: 14,083
iTrader: 10 reviews
|
no seriously, put your ass in front of the intake and that blower will suck it right off.
__________________
2008 Acura TL-S - 2008 Honda Pilot EX-SE - 2008 Cain F Big Bear Paradox |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:16 PM
|
#9 | |
|
RLY SRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:16 PM
|
#10 | |
|
RLY SRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:19 PM
|
#11 | |||
|
I Have Many Leather Bound Books
|
Yes...
__________________
 BCE REJIZZULATOR - BWAL, C.U.M.
|
|||
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:22 PM
|
#12 |
|
RLY SRS
|
OK thank you Zippie for putting my life back on track...
You are the Dr.Phil of MM... 
|
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:23 PM
|
#13 | ||
|
I Have Many Leather Bound Books
|
lol no probs man. That one was fresh in my mind as I just finished reading an article about compound boost in MM&FF, and the information was in that article. lol
__________________
BCE REJIZZULATOR - BWAL, C.U.M.
|
||
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:26 PM
|
#14 |
|
RLY SRS
|
Mustang is a true measure of torque.
DynoJets read whp and use engine rpm to calculate torque. Teh dynojet has no way of simulating vehicle load at speed. When you get the rollers rolling, it takes no more hp from the car to keep it there. The Mustang Dyno had the ability to artificially load the rollers to simulate car weight at speed, more closely representative of what is take to keep a XXXXlb car moving at speed. Both have correction factors but Mustang (or any load dyno) should give a better real world reading. Once you are tuned on a Mustang, there is little chance of it running leaner on the street then on the dyno like a DynoJet. Load dynos also run sweep tests in steady state mode which is a much slower and easier to read test. And they have more plot points and are a true measure of trq. And I stumbled upon this: DynoJet, Mustang Dyno | Editorials Blog & Discussions at Muscle Mustang and Fast Fords Magazine |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:27 PM
|
#15 | ||
|
I Have Many Leather Bound Books
|
Cool. I'ma have to read that when I get home.
__________________
BCE REJIZZULATOR - BWAL, C.U.M.
|
||
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:29 PM
|
#16 |
|
RLY SRS
|
347 dyno results - Hardcore 5.0 - The Mustang Drag Racers Forum
This has me interested...Ima see how much stuff I can dig up on this... |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 05:39 PM
|
#17 |
|
RLY SRS
|
|
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 06:32 PM
|
#18 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: somewhere in oklahoma
Posts: 10,635
iTrader: 2 reviews
|
dynojets make people feel good, and mustang dynos give a good tune. i dont know about you but id rather have a good solid tune. a dyno is only a tool for tuning but people get caught up on getting horsepower and torque numbers out of them
__________________
RIP  ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. One Big Ass Mistake America SHEEPDOGS |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 06:33 PM
|
#19 | |
|
RLY SRS
|
I was just making sure I was not going crazy... mainly the fuel issue is what I was wondering and just wanted to clarify... Im very happy with my car...382/381 is goodtimes for me... |
|
|
|
|
September 20th, 2008, 06:38 PM
|
#20 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: somewhere in oklahoma
Posts: 10,635
iTrader: 2 reviews
|
also chris, look into the lincoln aviator pumps. they flow 315 lph at 60psi fuel pressure. ive got twin aviators in mine
__________________
RIP ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. One Big Ass Mistake America SHEEPDOGS |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Mustang Dyno vs Dynojet
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dynojet vs Mustang dyno | gooberhead320 | The Clubhouse | 7 | April 24th, 2008 10:55 AM |
| Mustang Dyno vs Dyno Jet | BLOWN89 | 5.0 Mustangs | 18 | December 1st, 2007 10:34 PM |
| Mustang or Dynojet? | Eagle2000GT | Modular Mustangs | 6 | September 19th, 2007 11:45 PM |
| Dyno Jet vs Mustang dyno | bransdaman78 | General Tech | 6 | April 2nd, 2007 05:23 PM |
| Mustang Dyno Global Dyno Day! | BadMoFo | Southeast | 1 | September 20th, 2006 04:09 PM |
"
