![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Fuel Mileage vs. HP in the Engine Forum. Ok most of you guys know the simplistics of any engine... more air in + more ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 124
|
Fuel Mileage vs. HPDiscuss...... |
|
|
#2 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1997 Mustang Cobra
1/8 - 8.89@86mph
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 6,145
|
more hp more fuel is burned... you can grab a TB, Headers, Cai, and mid pipes which will flow more air letting your car breath better and thats like breathing through a star and taking the straw out and breathing with your mouth open... it makes a difference... but as soon as you get quite a bit more hp you need to upgrade your fuel system that will supply you engine with more gas faster. more gas faster/burned faster = drop in mpg...
its just like a stock engine when you romp on it. the computer tells it it needs more fuel so it dosnt burn up the pistons which causes poor fuel mileage.... this kinda what you where looking for? |
|
|
#3 |
|
Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 828
|
if you drive normal...you'll get normal mileage either way....
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arvada, CO
Posts: 51
|
It depends on what you modify. The air/fuel ratio stays the same.
If you just help it to breathe better (intake & exhaust) all is the same. If you change the cam, gearing etc, you move the RPM performance range (usually up). More RPMs means more a/f flowing through the engine. |
|
|
#5 | |
|
Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 828
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Enthusiast
1998 SVT Cobra
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 784
|
It also depends on the mods.
In my head, there are three types of modifications: a) Mods that increase the amount of fuel you can burn. b) Mods that decrease the amount of energy required to get power to the wheels. c) Mods that increase the efficiency of the burn. I got almost 20% more power to the wheels in my Corolla from doing things in group b. Increasing the efficiency of your intake and exhaust means you're not expending energy to pull air in or force air out. Reducing parasitic loss was HUGE for me. That's where I got almost all of my gains. I removed the A/C, converted to manual steering, and went from a clutch fan to an electric fan. If you're gonna go forced induction, a turbo is TREMENDOUSLY more efficient. A turbo is powered by the heat energy elsewise lost in your exhaust. It's basically a free lunch. With a supercharger, something like 50% of the power made by the blower is reconsumed just to run the supercharger. This means that under perfect efficiency, a 300hp motor that becomes a 450hp motor with a supercharger would've become a 600hp motor with a turbo. Of course, perfect efficiency doesn't exist, and I'm sure my example has been oversimplified.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------- The Sacred Chao says "MU" '96 Bronco XLT '98 Cobra '89 Camry AllTrac |
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 124
|
It seems also that with a higher HP/TQ engine under "normal" driving conditions one would exert LESS force to get the SAME affect and there you would also use less fuel.
I have known about this paticular scenario for a while and a friend of mine at work had to learn the hard way LOL. Anyway he has had a 6 cylinder mazda pick up for a while thats hes been driving back and forth to work. Well with gas the way it is and all and his good luck with his truck he decided to go get him another one. He goes and gets an '04 4 banger mazda... same body style, cab configuration, bed length and all. He statrs driving THAT truck back and forth to work and found out that the 4 banger gets WORSE milage than what his V6 gets. I found this out a few years ago. SOme 4 bangers have to work too hard to maintain highway speeds. There is no doubt that a 4 cylinder does better at stop and go city driving. But SOME of em just do ROTTON on the highway. Anyway sorry for getting a bit off topic.
__________________
Mods..BBK CAI MM Caster Camber Plates Baer Decalla Drilled and Sloted Rotors w/ painted callipers Hypercoated 18x9 FR500 Rims Eibach Pro Kit Lowering Springs More to come.....! |
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
next year
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 352
|
ya ive wondered about this too. i was considering getting me a 4banger ranger for a winter beater but with that side note, i think a 6 might be better. how would one make a ford AODE (from a 96 gt to be specific) more effiecent?
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Enthusiast
1998 SVT Cobra
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 784
|
My Corolla is a perfect example of the 4-cylinder highway speed poor gas mileage issue. If I could stay at 60 or under, it didn't matter how hard I drove that car, I'd get better than 30 mpg and that was with 3.90s in it (yes, RWD corolla). But if I drove 65-70, my mileage would drop to about 23mpg.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------- The Sacred Chao says "MU" '96 Bronco XLT '98 Cobra '89 Camry AllTrac |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
next year
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 352
|
would a different stall rpm tq convertor help or hurt? also, would larger brakes, say from stock to 14" rotors, hurt mpg?
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: parts unknown
Posts: 485
|
before SC: 17-22 mpg's
after SC: 11-14 mpg's looking at my fuel pressure at WOT it goes up to 65-70 psi, at idle it's about 30. idk what it was NA bc i didnt have the gauge then. having more hp to me, means a heavier foot also, its no fun having more hp and not using it. after CAI and exhaust only i did pick up a couple mpgs. so in conclusion, the more hp you have the more you're going to use it, hence less mpg's. |
|
|
#12 |
|
Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 828
|
I don't beat on my car often... Nor do i have a heavy foot.. I hit it from time to time...I'll even admit to street racing sometimes, but 90% of the time, i drive normally...
![]() As for turbos, a friend of mine has a 1992 corolla in which he swapped in a 4age... He turbocharged it and made slightly better mileage then he did N/A with the 4age... Megasquirt tuned.. Turbos do improve the efficiency..
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Fuel Mileage vs. HP
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fuel mileage with 8lbs and 3.73s | Grabber523 | 2005+ | 24 | March 27th, 2008 08:00 PM |
| gas mileage | 1BADSTANG | V6 Mustangs | 6 | March 26th, 2008 11:08 AM |
| Gas Mileage!!!!! HELP | theyanks904 | V6 Mustangs | 20 | July 20th, 2007 07:23 PM |
| Another Gas Mileage Topic... ["fuel used"] | goodeye | 2005+ | 9 | June 27th, 2007 05:36 PM |
| Gas Mileage? | oldernewbie | General Tech | 19 | October 9th, 2006 03:37 PM |