Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > General Tech > Engine

Discussing Fuel Mileage vs. HP in the Engine Forum. Ok most of you guys know the simplistics of any engine... more air in + more ...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old April 21st, 2008, 05:38 AM   #1
Regular
 
'02SilverBullet's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 124
Default

Fuel Mileage vs. HP


Ok most of you guys know the simplistics of any engine... more air in + more air out = more HP and a more EFFICIENT engine considering proper tuneing and so forth. It only makes sense to get better mileage out of a modified engine. The part I DONT get is... Considering the best driving habits one can have to conserve fuel....When does a modified car start to really lose fuel mileage? It SEEMS a 400 hp fi GT COULD get just as good (if not better) mileage as a stock one IF the driver could stay out of the boost. At what point really does the power of the engine REALLY start affecting fuel economy? Yeah I have seen big FI cars that get like 8 miles to the gallon but why is that? Is it the tune they are running? Is it cams? combination of everything?

Discuss......
 
Old April 21st, 2008, 06:10 AM   #2
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
97Cobra's Avatar
 
1997 Mustang Cobra
1/8 - 8.89@86mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 6,145
Default

more hp more fuel is burned... you can grab a TB, Headers, Cai, and mid pipes which will flow more air letting your car breath better and thats like breathing through a star and taking the straw out and breathing with your mouth open... it makes a difference... but as soon as you get quite a bit more hp you need to upgrade your fuel system that will supply you engine with more gas faster. more gas faster/burned faster = drop in mpg...

its just like a stock engine when you romp on it. the computer tells it it needs more fuel so it dosnt burn up the pistons which causes poor fuel mileage.... this kinda what you where looking for?
__________________

Modifications and pics in my Garage...

Originally Posted by BWAL09 View Post
same shit happened to me a few years ago.turns out the chick was indeed a slut. i never talked to her again
Originally Posted by 96GTRagTop View Post
must be real weird at the dinner table not talking to ur mom and all
 
Old April 21st, 2008, 01:44 PM   #3
Enthusiast
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 828
Default

if you drive normal...you'll get normal mileage either way....
 
Old April 21st, 2008, 02:20 PM   #4
Regular
 
Kobra Killer's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Arvada, CO
Posts: 51
Default

It depends on what you modify. The air/fuel ratio stays the same.
If you just help it to breathe better (intake & exhaust) all is the same.
If you change the cam, gearing etc, you move the RPM performance range (usually up).
More RPMs means more a/f flowing through the engine.
__________________
Clevelands Rule
https://home.comcast.net/~jimmiephil...er_project.htm
 
Old April 21st, 2008, 09:32 PM   #5
Enthusiast
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 828
Default

Originally Posted by Kobra Killer View Post
It depends on what you modify. The air/fuel ratio stays the same.
If you just help it to breathe better (intake & exhaust) all is the same.
If you change the cam, gearing etc, you move the RPM performance range (usually up).
More RPMs means more a/f flowing through the engine.
i agree...but a good tune still equals good gas mileage...I've gained 100 rwhp and didn't lost much if any gas mileage...
 
Old April 21st, 2008, 09:46 PM   #6
Enthusiast
 
1998 SVT Cobra
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 784
Default

It also depends on the mods.

In my head, there are three types of modifications:
a) Mods that increase the amount of fuel you can burn.
b) Mods that decrease the amount of energy required to get power to the wheels.
c) Mods that increase the efficiency of the burn.

I got almost 20% more power to the wheels in my Corolla from doing things in group b.

Increasing the efficiency of your intake and exhaust means you're not expending energy to pull air in or force air out.

Reducing parasitic loss was HUGE for me. That's where I got almost all of my gains. I removed the A/C, converted to manual steering, and went from a clutch fan to an electric fan.

If you're gonna go forced induction, a turbo is TREMENDOUSLY more efficient. A turbo is powered by the heat energy elsewise lost in your exhaust. It's basically a free lunch. With a supercharger, something like 50% of the power made by the blower is reconsumed just to run the supercharger. This means that under perfect efficiency, a 300hp motor that becomes a 450hp motor with a supercharger would've become a 600hp motor with a turbo. Of course, perfect efficiency doesn't exist, and I'm sure my example has been oversimplified.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------
The Sacred Chao says "MU"
'96 Bronco XLT
'98 Cobra
'89 Camry AllTrac
 
Old April 21st, 2008, 10:16 PM   #7
Regular
 
'02SilverBullet's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 124
Default

It seems also that with a higher HP/TQ engine under "normal" driving conditions one would exert LESS force to get the SAME affect and there you would also use less fuel.

I have known about this paticular scenario for a while and a friend of mine at work had to learn the hard way LOL. Anyway he has had a 6 cylinder mazda pick up for a while thats hes been driving back and forth to work. Well with gas the way it is and all and his good luck with his truck he decided to go get him another one. He goes and gets an '04 4 banger mazda... same body style, cab configuration, bed length and all. He statrs driving THAT truck back and forth to work and found out that the 4 banger gets WORSE milage than what his V6 gets. I found this out a few years ago. SOme 4 bangers have to work too hard to maintain highway speeds. There is no doubt that a 4 cylinder does better at stop and go city driving. But SOME of em just do ROTTON on the highway.

Anyway sorry for getting a bit off topic.
__________________
Mods..
BBK CAI
MM Caster Camber Plates
Baer Decalla Drilled and Sloted Rotors
w/ painted callipers
Hypercoated 18x9 FR500 Rims
Eibach Pro Kit Lowering Springs
More to come.....!
 
Old April 21st, 2008, 11:29 PM   #8
Regular
 
HBK_2007's Avatar
 
1996 Mustang GT
next year
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 352
Default

ya ive wondered about this too. i was considering getting me a 4banger ranger for a winter beater but with that side note, i think a 6 might be better. how would one make a ford AODE (from a 96 gt to be specific) more effiecent?
 
Old April 21st, 2008, 11:40 PM   #9
Enthusiast
 
1998 SVT Cobra
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 784
Default

Originally Posted by HBK_2007 View Post
ya ive wondered about this too. i was considering getting me a 4banger ranger for a winter beater but with that side note, i think a 6 might be better. how would one make a ford AODE (from a 96 gt to be specific) more effiecent?
Shift kit, and different gears. (Lower gears will help your city mileage).

My Corolla is a perfect example of the 4-cylinder highway speed poor gas mileage issue. If I could stay at 60 or under, it didn't matter how hard I drove that car, I'd get better than 30 mpg and that was with 3.90s in it (yes, RWD corolla). But if I drove 65-70, my mileage would drop to about 23mpg.
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------
The Sacred Chao says "MU"
'96 Bronco XLT
'98 Cobra
'89 Camry AllTrac
 
Old April 21st, 2008, 11:47 PM   #10
Regular
 
HBK_2007's Avatar
 
1996 Mustang GT
next year
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 352
Default

would a different stall rpm tq convertor help or hurt? also, would larger brakes, say from stock to 14" rotors, hurt mpg?
 
Old April 21st, 2008, 11:52 PM   #11
Regular
 
onederful100's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: parts unknown
Posts: 485
Default

before SC: 17-22 mpg's
after SC: 11-14 mpg's
looking at my fuel pressure at WOT it goes up to 65-70 psi, at idle it's about 30. idk what it was NA bc i didnt have the gauge then. having more hp to me, means a heavier foot also, its no fun having more hp and not using it. after CAI and exhaust only i did pick up a couple mpgs. so in conclusion, the more hp you have the more you're going to use it, hence less mpg's.
__________________
http://i243.photobucket.com/albums/ff26/onederful100/Onederful100-2.png
2007 GT 5sp
whipple crew member
boomtube crew member
My Car
 
Old April 22nd, 2008, 02:28 PM   #12
Enthusiast
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 828
Default

I don't beat on my car often... Nor do i have a heavy foot.. I hit it from time to time...I'll even admit to street racing sometimes, but 90% of the time, i drive normally...


As for turbos, a friend of mine has a 1992 corolla in which he swapped in a 4age... He turbocharged it and made slightly better mileage then he did N/A with the 4age... Megasquirt tuned.. Turbos do improve the efficiency..
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Fuel Mileage vs. HP
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel mileage with 8lbs and 3.73s Grabber523 2005+ 24 March 27th, 2008 08:00 PM
gas mileage 1BADSTANG V6 Mustangs 6 March 26th, 2008 11:08 AM
Gas Mileage!!!!! HELP theyanks904 V6 Mustangs 20 July 20th, 2007 07:23 PM
Another Gas Mileage Topic... ["fuel used"] goodeye 2005+ 9 June 27th, 2007 05:36 PM
Gas Mileage? oldernewbie General Tech 19 October 9th, 2006 03:37 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.