Thread age suggestion.

Ke^in · June 17th, 2009, 11:25 AM

I just got a "warning" for "spamming" by bumping an old thread unintentionally (it was old, but the section doesn't get many hits so it was near the top)

Instead of giving people infractions or whatever for doing this, why not have it so threads of a certain age get automatically locked? I know a Mac forum I was in at one time did this. As most cases, such things aren't done on purpose, but on accident. Especially if you are new here. This way the problem gets solved, and no one gets "warned" for something they weren't purposely doing.

BTW, not complaining about the "warning".. just offering a better solution.

That and using "spam" to describe such indiscretions is incorrect IMHO

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic)

Smoothgrandmama · June 17th, 2009, 11:44 AM

If it wasnt more than four pages back. . . . then you should be good

Ke^in · June 17th, 2009, 12:04 PM

That isn't true. As this thread I posted at was still on the original page. *shrug*

winnie51189 · June 17th, 2009, 12:33 PM

the thread was old and they gave you a warning. I've gotten it before, no big deal though. Btw it doesn't matter if it is less that 4pgs back or not. It's just the fact that it was old. The pg thing only applies if you are quoting or commenting on something that is posted on previous pages. Unless of course it's still the original post. I could be wrong tho. No one cares tho if they get a warning. Atleast they don't ban you for it. Lol I would've been gone a long time ago
Moral: always check the time stamp before posting. Then if its old, PM the person you are responding to, or start a new thread.

Ke^in · June 17th, 2009, 01:38 PM

Oh, I am not complaining about the warning. I was just trying to make a comment about how there is a better way to do things. I couldn't give to monkey fists about the warning.

winnie51189 · June 17th, 2009, 01:57 PM

I know your not complaining, just offering an easy temp. fix since it could be a while until they get around to looking over the old rules.

weems · June 17th, 2009, 04:38 PM

No, because sometimes someone will legitimately bump an old thread instead of creating a new one. Which in turn, would not be an infraction or warning.

Ke^in · June 19th, 2009, 10:14 AM

Originally Posted by weems

No, because sometimes someone will legitimately bump an old thread instead of creating a new one. Which in turn, would not be an infraction or warning.

You sure about that? I did it once and got a warning.

weems · June 19th, 2009, 10:42 AM

Originally Posted by Ke^in

You sure about that? I did it once and got a warning.

Thread in question?

weems · June 19th, 2009, 10:44 AM

I found it. FREE And Easy Shorty Antenna

This is not a legitimate bump, so yes I am sure about that.

Ke^in · June 19th, 2009, 11:17 AM

That wasn't the thread I was referring to..

weems · June 19th, 2009, 01:22 PM

Thats what you received a warning for.

Ke^in · June 19th, 2009, 06:02 PM

THAT type of warning. I was warned once in a thread for bumping one that had something in it that I was wanting to ask about etc. No biggy really. I'm not complaining.

G.T. Rags · June 19th, 2009, 06:09 PM

can u get a warning for bumping ur own thread?

just curious....... i wanna update my quest thread..... but now I'm not so sure

Seabee · June 19th, 2009, 06:16 PM

almost makes you wonder what threads can and cant be bumped, and if you should make a new one or not

G.T. Rags · June 19th, 2009, 06:18 PM

Originally Posted by NavySeabee87

almost makes you wonder what threads can and cant be bumped, and if you should make a new one or not

+1

BWAL09 · June 19th, 2009, 09:59 PM

when you bump an old thread, if you post information or a question relevant to the original topic of the thread, you aren't doing anything wrong. rags, if you updated your thread, that shouldn't be an infraction or warning. i'm not a moderator, so don't take my word as the final word, as who gets infractions for what is up to the mods/admin in the end, but according to the rules, you wouldn't get in trouble for that. if people got in trouble for bumping old threads to add information or ask a question pertaining to the original post, then you'd never see people say "use the search function"

Ke^in · June 20th, 2009, 07:14 AM

Originally Posted by weems

This is not a legitimate bump, so yes I am sure about that.

Not legit? I posted at it actually because I was about to buy a shorty and saw the thread on the front page of the forum it was in and made a comment. I mean I GUESS I could have started a new thread, but then I'd be flamed for doing so since one already existed on the first page. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. *shrug*

weems · June 21st, 2009, 12:32 AM

Originally Posted by G.T. Rags

can u get a warning for bumping ur own thread?

just curious....... i wanna update my quest thread..... but now I'm not so sure

For one, it was a damn warning, no infractions, no points, a warning, and no it wasn't me who gave it to him. And once again, if the bump is LEGIT, then nothing will happen.

Originally Posted by NavySeabee87

almost makes you wonder what threads can and cant be bumped, and if you should make a new one or not

Give me a break.

Seabee · June 21st, 2009, 03:15 AM

Originally Posted by weems

Give me a break.

break not given

June 17th, 2009, 11:25 AM	#1
Ke^in Hardcore Enthusiast 2002 Mustang GT ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Mid-Ohio Valley Posts: 1,898	Thread age suggestion. I just got a "warning" for "spamming" by bumping an old thread unintentionally (it was old, but the section doesn't get many hits so it was near the top) Instead of giving people infractions or whatever for doing this, why not have it so threads of a certain age get automatically locked? I know a Mac forum I was in at one time did this. As most cases, such things aren't done on purpose, but on accident. Especially if you are new here. This way the problem gets solved, and no one gets "warned" for something they weren't purposely doing. BTW, not complaining about the "warning".. just offering a better solution. That and using "spam" to describe such indiscretions is incorrect IMHO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic) __________________

June 17th, 2009, 11:44 AM	#2
Smoothgrandmama Editor/Blue Cyclone 03 Cobra, 09 GT 1 Minute 23 secs @36 mph Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Willis,Texas Posts: 3,279	If it wasnt more than four pages back. . . . then you should be good __________________ 360 MM Gaming Crew

June 17th, 2009, 12:04 PM	#3
Ke^in Hardcore Enthusiast 2002 Mustang GT ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Mid-Ohio Valley Posts: 1,898	That isn't true. As this thread I posted at was still on the original page. shrug __________________

June 17th, 2009, 01:38 PM	#5
Ke^in Hardcore Enthusiast 2002 Mustang GT ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Mid-Ohio Valley Posts: 1,898	Oh, I am not complaining about the warning. I was just trying to make a comment about how there is a better way to do things. I couldn't give to monkey fists about the warning. __________________

June 17th, 2009, 04:38 PM	#7
weems Well Hellerrr.. 2001 Bullitt N/A Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Forsyth/Statesboro, GA Posts: 5,816	No, because sometimes someone will legitimately bump an old thread instead of creating a new one. Which in turn, would not be an infraction or warning. __________________

Sponsored Links	Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement

June 19th, 2009, 10:44 AM	#10
weems Well Hellerrr.. 2001 Bullitt N/A Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Forsyth/Statesboro, GA Posts: 5,816	I found it. FREE And Easy Shorty Antenna This is not a legitimate bump, so yes I am sure about that. __________________

June 19th, 2009, 11:17 AM	#11
Ke^in Hardcore Enthusiast 2002 Mustang GT ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Mid-Ohio Valley Posts: 1,898	That wasn't the thread I was referring to.. __________________

June 19th, 2009, 01:22 PM	#12
weems Well Hellerrr.. 2001 Bullitt N/A Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Forsyth/Statesboro, GA Posts: 5,816	Thats what you received a warning for. __________________

June 19th, 2009, 06:02 PM	#13
Ke^in Hardcore Enthusiast 2002 Mustang GT ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ ☣ ☢ Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Mid-Ohio Valley Posts: 1,898	THAT type of warning. I was warned once in a thread for bumping one that had something in it that I was wanting to ask about etc. No biggy really. I'm not complaining. __________________

June 19th, 2009, 09:59 PM	#17
BWAL09 Any hole is my goal! 2021 Mustang V12 Quad Turbo with nawz Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: modified88dreamer likes penis in and around his mouth Posts: 9,962	when you bump an old thread, if you post information or a question relevant to the original topic of the thread, you aren't doing anything wrong. rags, if you updated your thread, that shouldn't be an infraction or warning. i'm not a moderator, so don't take my word as the final word, as who gets infractions for what is up to the mods/admin in the end, but according to the rules, you wouldn't get in trouble for that. if people got in trouble for bumping old threads to add information or ask a question pertaining to the original post, then you'd never see people say "use the search function" __________________ 1989 LX 5.0 1990 LX 5.0 1993 LX 2.3 notch 1992 LX 5.0 1997 Cobra Buy one get one free. PM me i founded the founder of the cobra club

Threads Similar to: Thread age suggestion.
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Age.	JASonic	The Clubhouse	70	March 6th, 2009 11:15 PM
Exhaust suggestion thread # 482	fatalflaw	V6 Mustangs	6	June 14th, 2008 06:54 PM
Age	Fastback91	Modular Mustangs	81	January 13th, 2008 07:25 PM
Age	charlesnash	The Clubhouse	73	October 15th, 2007 10:59 AM
age?	vshayes	The Clubhouse	41	November 1st, 2005 10:46 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 AM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.