100 shot dry
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > General Tech

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old April 29th, 2007, 11:33 PM   #1
Banned
 
00 V6 & 09 GT
13.37@104.4mph--BONE stock GT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 15,806
itschristorres8 has a spectacular aura aboutitschristorres8 has a spectacular aura aboutitschristorres8 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to itschristorres8
Default

100 shot dry


ive "Heard" once reach about 125-150 its good to not use dry shots

i wana run a 75-125 shot soon but dry....is what im hearing just bullshit or what?

also what are some benifits of a wet shot vs a dry, and what else would it require?
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Acmillr loves me
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old May 1st, 2007, 07:24 PM   #2
Enthusiast
 
2000Mustang's Avatar
 
1998 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 561
2000Mustang is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

If interested, I have a 75 dry shot for sale. If you decide to go wet, you can buy a kit to make it wet.
__________________
Off-road X pipe, Magnaflow mufflers, BBK cai, 3.73 gears, ZEX 75 shot (not hooked up), 17in. Bullitts, lowered
  Reply With Quote
Old May 1st, 2007, 07:37 PM   #3
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Who told you dry systems are bad? Whoever it was needs to shut the hell up until they gain some knowledge.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2007, 12:01 AM   #4
Banned
 
00 V6 & 09 GT
13.37@104.4mph--BONE stock GT
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 15,806
itschristorres8 has a spectacular aura aboutitschristorres8 has a spectacular aura aboutitschristorres8 has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 2 reviews
Send a message via AIM to itschristorres8
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell
Who told you dry systems are bad? Whoever it was needs to shut the hell up until they gain some knowledge.
what would you recommend for a 75-125shot or even 150shot...

i'd rather do dry shots, but if wet will be better or safe on the engine i'll stick with a wet kit
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Acmillr loves me
  Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2007, 02:34 AM   #5
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by itschristorres8
what would you recommend for a 75-125shot or even 150shot...

i'd rather do dry shots, but if wet will be better or safe on the engine i'll stick with a wet kit
NOS or NX dry system.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2007, 05:55 PM   #6
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 461
banned is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

wet will be better / easier to tune, my impression is that a dry shot is good for 100 or less, and that dry was a good way to go on top of a blower
__________________
Considering selling my car to fund my race car: take a look and tell me what you think.
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post1041280
  Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2007, 11:24 PM   #7
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by banned
wet will be better / easier to tune, my impression is that a dry shot is good for 100 or less, and that dry was a good way to go on top of a blower
You should only give advice on topics in which you have knowledge instead of spreading misinformation.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2007, 12:56 AM   #8
MeZ
Enthusiast
 
MeZ's Avatar
 
2004 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Concord, North Carolina
Posts: 966
MeZ is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I have experience with both systems ... wet is my preference .. its easy to set up ... easy to dial in .. I didn't like my dry system b/c the comp mang.system that comes with gave me trouble .. and I switched over to a wet plate system w. window switch and wot ...
__________________
Car For Sale on Autotrader.com
04 Silver GT 32K Miles
Parts 4 Sale:
18" Wheels SSR GT3 replicas w/ tires
Steeda Tri-Ax
10lb N20 Bottle w. gauge
(2) Kirkey Racing Seats w/ RCI 5 Pt. belts
Steeda & Momo shift knobs
SB GT Spoiler
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2007, 05:11 PM   #9
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 461
banned is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell
Originally Posted by banned
wet will be better / easier to tune, my impression is that a dry shot is good for 100 or less, and that dry was a good way to go on top of a blower
You should only give advice on topics in which you have knowledge instead of spreading misinformation.
well considering i installed both types of systems please tell me how I am miss informed, wet is safer to tune period... you just need a window switch so you dont pool.
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2007, 05:28 PM   #10
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 461
banned is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

that plus the power gain between wet and dry is very different so its not like 100 dry shot = 100 wet shot, and the tuning varies accordingly. For pushrods yea its alot easier, but for the 4.6 crowd ( and ive been there and done this) the nx wet plate system is the best bet imo, to be fair i am by no means a pro - nor to do i pretend to be, i could be wrong but take it for what it is - advice over the internet... if my personal experience makes me a misinformer then ohh well, call me guilty.
__________________
Considering selling my car to fund my race car: take a look and tell me what you think.
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post1041280
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2007, 11:45 PM   #11
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by banned

well considering i installed both types of systems please tell me how I am miss informed, wet is safer to tune period... you just need a window switch so you dont pool.
Window switches have nothing to do with fuel pooling.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2007, 11:49 PM   #12
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by banned
that plus the power gain between wet and dry is very different so its not like 100 dry shot = 100 wet shot, and the tuning varies accordingly. For pushrods yea its alot easier, but for the 4.6 crowd ( and ive been there and done this) the nx wet plate system is the best bet imo, to be fair i am by no means a pro - nor to do i pretend to be, i could be wrong but take it for what it is - advice over the internet... if my personal experience makes me a misinformer then ohh well, call me guilty.
We dynoed a 95 Cobra with an NOS dry kit with 150hp jets. That car made 167hp more at the wheels with that nitrous kit. We also did an 87 LX with a Nitrous Works wet kit with 175hp jets. It made 177hp more at the wheels with nitrous. Very similar. Wet or dry doesn't mean more or less horsepower. The only difference between the two is a dry kit doesn't introduce the fuel and nitrous as a mixture, the fuel is introduced separately mainly because EFI intake manifolds are designed to flow air and not fuel.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2007, 07:49 PM   #13
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 461
banned is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

  Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2007, 07:49 PM   #14
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 461
banned is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

the wet kit pools when you spray too low in the rpms, ive seen it happen and a window can definitly prevent that. as far as dry vs wet goes all I know is in the car i dealt with the 100 dry shot put about 100 xtra down while the 100 wet kit put 120 extra down, with an even bigger gain in torque over the dry setup. Are you talkin about a 5.0 or a 4.6 or some other pushrod?
  Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2007, 07:49 PM   #15
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 461
banned is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

damn double posting
__________________
Considering selling my car to fund my race car: take a look and tell me what you think.
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post1041280
  Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2007, 10:32 PM   #16
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by banned
the wet kit pools when you spray too low in the rpms, ive seen it happen and a window can definitly prevent that. as far as dry vs wet goes all I know is in the car i dealt with the 100 dry shot put about 100 xtra down while the 100 wet kit put 120 extra down, with an even bigger gain in torque over the dry setup. Are you talkin about a 5.0 or a 4.6 or some other pushrod?
Fuel puddling occurs not due to rpm at all, it is due to the design of EFI intakes. They are designed to flow air, not fuel so they have dips and valleys all over. From what I understand the 4.6 intakes are not as bad as the 5 liter intakes but I've never cut a 4.6 intake apart. I do know that the fuel puddling problem exists with 4.6 engines too. Maybe its not as big of an issue as it is with 5 liters but the problem is still there.

As far as horsepower numbers go, 4 lbs of nitrous is 4 lbs of nitrous no matter if it is introduced with fuel as a mixture or introduced separately from the fuel.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2007, 11:03 AM   #17
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 461
banned is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

wel pound for pound your correct, but delivery makes a difference just look at direct port cars. Im only talkin about 4.6 motors here, and puddling is a serious issue if you spray below 3 -3500 rpm its going to happen = boom
__________________
Considering selling my car to fund my race car: take a look and tell me what you think.
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post1041280
  Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2007, 10:13 PM   #18
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by banned
wel pound for pound your correct, but delivery makes a difference just look at direct port cars. Im only talkin about 4.6 motors here, and puddling is a serious issue if you spray below 3 -3500 rpm its going to happen = boom
Choice between direct port and dry systems, direct port all the way. There are no issues with direct port systems that I know of. The wet plate systems and wet single nozzle systems are the ones with the issues.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old May 14th, 2007, 12:59 PM   #19
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 461
banned is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

yea direct port for sure, if youve got 1500 bucks
__________________
Considering selling my car to fund my race car: take a look and tell me what you think.
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post1041280
  Reply With Quote
Old May 27th, 2007, 05:10 PM   #20
Enthusiast
 
catchtheroadrunner's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 764
catchtheroadrunner will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by banned
wel pound for pound your correct, but delivery makes a difference just look at direct port cars. Im only talkin about 4.6 motors here, and puddling is a serious issue if you spray below 3 -3500 rpm its going to happen = boom
B.S...Has anyone ever seen a puddle of nitrous oxide? Of course not. Nitrous doesn't condense unless it's cold enough or under enough pressure (How many psi are those bottles?). The whole nitrous pooling theory is a bunch of crap. The problem is some other variable that surrounds an attempt at a proper nitrous tune.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: 100 shot dry
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
125 Shot? SantanielloITA V6 Mustangs 25 November 10th, 2007 02:56 PM
wet shot? superman5.0 5.0 Mustangs 4 July 25th, 2007 12:38 PM
what is the best shot of n20? 40thmustanggt 99-04 10 July 19th, 2007 09:32 AM
Zex wet shot 95wip 5.0 Mustangs 1 May 2nd, 2007 02:30 PM
how big of nos shot 95StangSVT General Tech 16 February 6th, 2007 09:32 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:35 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.