turbo or supercharger

wadepetersen · October 30th, 2007, 12:21 PM

which is better
i no the basics superchargers are more expensive and easier to install
but turbos get more power
I also no that superchargers dont lag
I alos no that turbos use wasted engery and that superchargers use energy to make power
is there anything else that i should no

tlr96 · October 30th, 2007, 12:23 PM

turbos are more expensive, but if you have the money thats the way to go.

BWAL · October 30th, 2007, 01:34 PM

:homo

twin screw superchargers have no lag, but centrifugals do.. a centrifugal is more like a belt driven trubocharger.. centrifugal has more parasitic loss than a twin screw, but a turbocharger has no parasitic loss

single turbocharger FTW

88mstang · October 30th, 2007, 01:34 PM

TURBO BUT I DO LIKE A KENNE BELL

casper1773 · October 31st, 2007, 02:11 AM

Another challenge with boosting a engine is...... knowing what your compression ratio is and how much boost you can do before posibly needing to change headgasket designs and need stronger headbolts.

TurboLX · October 31st, 2007, 02:26 PM

read my boost article on the top of the page

October 30th, 2007, 12:21 PM	#1
wadepetersen Regular Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 369 iTrader: 0 reviews	turbo or supercharger which is better i no the basics superchargers are more expensive and easier to install but turbos get more power I also no that superchargers dont lag I alos no that turbos use wasted engery and that superchargers use energy to make power is there anything else that i should no

October 30th, 2007, 12:23 PM	#2
tlr96 Hardcore Enthusiast 1996 Mustang GT Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Effingham, IL Posts: 1,795 iTrader: 0 reviews	turbos are more expensive, but if you have the money thats the way to go. __________________ view my garage for pics and modifications listen to my exhaust video 1 video 2 video 3

October 30th, 2007, 01:34 PM	#3
BWAL MSTRB8N & MDR8N 2021 Mustang V15 Quad Turbo with nawz Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: On The Shaft Posts: 19,662 Blog Entries: 2 iTrader: 4 reviews	:homo twin screw superchargers have no lag, but centrifugals do.. a centrifugal is more like a belt driven trubocharger.. centrifugal has more parasitic loss than a twin screw, but a turbocharger has no parasitic loss single turbocharger FTW __________________ MM 1 am boner crew Cars and mod list in garage i like veiny meat sliding between my buttcheeks

October 31st, 2007, 02:26 PM	#6
TurboLX I Post Entirely Way Too Much 1988 Mustang LX Turbo Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: NY Posts: 8,778 Blog Entries: 1 iTrader: 0 reviews	read my boost article on the top of the page __________________ 1988 LX Coupe 2.5L, GT35R, 44mm WG, 32psi, C16.

Threads Similar to: turbo or supercharger
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
turbo, twin turbo, or supercharger?	mustangman87	5.0 Mustangs	31	March 6th, 2010 07:35 PM
Supercharger or Turbo?	Stangbro8994	V6 Mustangs	46	May 20th, 2007 11:50 AM
turbo or supercharger	Danderson	V6 Mustangs	39	April 11th, 2007 11:26 PM
Supercharger, Twin Turbo, and Single Turbo	justinsstang	General Tech	24	March 7th, 2007 09:07 PM
Turbo or supercharger?	98StangGT	96-98	13	June 24th, 2006 06:36 PM

October 30th, 2007, 01:34 PM	#4
88mstang Regular Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Stafford,VA Posts: 87 iTrader: 0 reviews	TURBO BUT I DO LIKE A KENNE BELL

Remove Advertisements Sponsored Links
Ford Mustang Forum Advertisement

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 AM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs : Ford Mustang Forums - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.