| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
|
Just A Simple Question About MAF
Yea just curious but i have and ram air intake.....well the fender-well intake for my 96 3.8l v6. My question is i think it came off of an 5.0, so if it did what size would the maf. be cause i think it goes by the housing size. Plz let me know if someone knows. ty oyea we made some extra tubing to make it work....just so that you know why it looks like that lol.
__________________
!994 mustang with 96 3.8l engine. Ram air intake, Helix tower power throttle body space, dual exaust w/flowmaster's, 98 gt rearend 8.8 w/ 327 gears,SCT Xcalibrator 2 sf, and lots of audio and entertainment
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
MM Fanatic
2002 Mustang GT
11.47@120.58
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 3,940
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
It's based on the housing size. I can't remember the stock size, I think it's 65 - 70mm though I'm not sure.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Newbie
|
ok....but would that be the size of the housing that came with the intake? Like i said im pretty sure it came of an 5.0. But it was an kit i got from an friend. I got and xcal2 and im trying to tune it so i need to know. I thinks it is bigger than the one that is stock on the 3.8v6 off an 96 engine. Ty for the help.
__________________
!994 mustang with 96 3.8l engine. Ram air intake, Helix tower power throttle body space, dual exaust w/flowmaster's, 98 gt rearend 8.8 w/ 327 gears,SCT Xcalibrator 2 sf, and lots of audio and entertainment
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
95 opalfrost gt
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,516
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
If you said its from a 5.0 and thats the pic of it. Then its a 70mm off a 94-95 car.
__________________
![]() 5.0 magazines 94-04 performance mustangs feature car! Fall 2010 |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Doc
1986 SVO
48.47@ 12.58
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 37,050
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 11 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Newbie
|
well i have the o2 sensor simulators..... what the differrance and give me details lol! ty
__________________
!994 mustang with 96 3.8l engine. Ram air intake, Helix tower power throttle body space, dual exaust w/flowmaster's, 98 gt rearend 8.8 w/ 327 gears,SCT Xcalibrator 2 sf, and lots of audio and entertainment
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Doc
1986 SVO
48.47@ 12.58
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 37,050
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 11 reviews
|
OK I KNOW THIS IS LONG... FORGIVE ME...
Seems some people have questions on the purpose of a Wideband O2 sensor so here is why you need one if you plan on more modifications. In case you don’t know much about AF, Lean has higher AF numbers and less gas, and Rich has lower AF numbers and more gas. If you run too lean your motor will get extra hot and lead to issues like detonation which will burn holes into your pistons, blow head gaskets, grenade motors, etc. Running too rich will wash the oil off the piston rings and cause issues due to excess friction. Lean will get you more HP, but will be closer to the edge of detonation. Running rich will net less HP, but will be more tolerant of bad gas, hotter temps, etc (safer). Timing also plays a role in heat and detonation so it’s good to know that a lean mixture will handle less timing that a rich mixture due to the cooling effect of the extra gas. Higher octane is required for leaner / more timing tunes. Never ever run 87 octane in a highly modified vehicle, and never run 91 octane in a car with the stock tune for 87 or you will loose power and get worse gas mileage. The stock O2 sensors are narrow band sensors that have the very good resolution around the stoichiometric AF of 14.64, but have very poor resolution in the range below 12. The Narrow band gauges are a waste of money, they do nothing as far as actual AF at WOT because they are not accurate at the desired ranges. They are designed to use about 90% of their output range centered directly around AF of 14.64, so you get excellent resolution between 14 and 15 which works great for part throttle driving, gas mileage, emissions, but is way too inaccurate for WOT ranges. The wideband O2 sensors have a linear output range from about AF 9 to AF 18 so they give accurate results over the entire AF range. Here is some general AF target ranges, but feel free to ask any questions you might have. NA car 12.4-13.2 Blown Stang 11.5-12 Blown Focus 11.0-11.8 Heavily blown 11.0-11.5 If you are doing any high speed runs the WO2 is the most important gauge to monitor.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Newbie
|
thnx for the info dude, and were might i get these o2 sensors at? an normal autozone?
__________________
!994 mustang with 96 3.8l engine. Ram air intake, Helix tower power throttle body space, dual exaust w/flowmaster's, 98 gt rearend 8.8 w/ 327 gears,SCT Xcalibrator 2 sf, and lots of audio and entertainment
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Doc
1986 SVO
48.47@ 12.58
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 37,050
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 11 reviews
|
nah man.. pm me i'll hook you up with a guy that sells them
__________________
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Doc
1986 SVO
48.47@ 12.58
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 37,050
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 11 reviews
|
auto zone hahaha
__________________
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Just A Simple Question About MAF
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| simple question. | MIGHTYJO3YOUNG | 5.0 Mustangs | 11 | July 3rd, 2008 03:09 PM |
| very simple question | Murderjetz | V6 Mustangs | 22 | August 14th, 2007 07:30 PM |
| A Simple Question: | WAR-PARTY | The Clubhouse | 16 | June 30th, 2007 01:48 PM |
| Simple question | 8A_Honda | 5.0 Mustangs | 2 | June 17th, 2007 10:12 AM |
| Simple question... | 2000Mustang | V6 Mustangs | 37 | April 13th, 2007 09:08 PM |