| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
Priest of the Car Gods
|
Then spend $2k to by a gas-sipping DD, and don't be half-assed with the Mustang with the other $8k+.
__________________
O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ TheUNZippee! is right! Let us all BOW to his unerring ways in a respectful, nay, obsequious manner! ![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 154
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Sounds like a typical push rod guy...trying to squeeze 400 -450 out of a 2v n/a is a lot harder than a push rod car...the car will not be a good daily driver...as for the tuning part that would be considered in part of the install money...if your paying more than 500 for a programmer and a tune then your getting ripped off..if it were me i would buy another car you could get a blown 99-04 gt for 10-12k shoot the red car in that video is for sale right now with 66k miles and im looking to get 11.5k...so buy another car man and keep that one as the dd.
__________________
2001 Bullitt..currently under the knife,Built 4r75w aluminator, Trickflow Cnc'd Heads, Hpperformance twin kit all the bells and whistles=Hulk Smasssh! If your interested in a twin turbo kit let me know! I can help get you a great deal on one! |
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Regular
1996 Mustang GT
faster than the stealth
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: illinois
Posts: 405
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
1996 Mustang GT 5-speed sold.. ![]() ![]() http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VuRDQGk4k8 http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3340297 |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
if you stroke it its not that hard.
Friend has a stroke 3v granted the heads help but he put 386 or something close to that with eagles 302 stroker kit long tubes intake and a tune.
__________________
Just a truck 5.4 3v: 264hp 317ft lbs rock stock piecing together the next project faster than your first sexual experience |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 154
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
last time I checked 386 was less than 400+...and having the motor built is gonna be just as expensive...just go by yourself a new car and keep that until it dies man!
__________________
2001 Bullitt..currently under the knife,Built 4r75w aluminator, Trickflow Cnc'd Heads, Hpperformance twin kit all the bells and whistles=Hulk Smasssh! If your interested in a twin turbo kit let me know! I can help get you a great deal on one! |
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
bet its not even close to 400
__________________
Just a truck 5.4 3v: 264hp 317ft lbs rock stock piecing together the next project faster than your first sexual experience |
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Enthusiast
89 Mustang Lx
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 527
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
If you want to make power and save money then at least grab PI heads, port them, Cams, better intake, Gears, and a $250 PROGRAMMER. The tuner is not no dang $500 so he's just wanting credits for saying that. Also it may sound like a "typical" pushrod guy but it's also a mustang. If V6's can push whooping numbers like 600-700hp then getting at least more realistic 350-375 is nothing. Some of the generations above 96's made 300hp and supercharger added 125 to the ground. So it's not about taking the lasy/easy way out and spend a crapload of money on one thing to serve your purpose, build on what you have. It's about how you put the power down, not how much money can be spend to get what you want.
__________________
94-95 306, B-Cam, Off-brand BBK Like Headers, H-Pipe, 3.73's, Nitrous Wet Shot 175 Shot |
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 154
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
2001 Bullitt..currently under the knife,Built 4r75w aluminator, Trickflow Cnc'd Heads, Hpperformance twin kit all the bells and whistles=Hulk Smasssh! If your interested in a twin turbo kit let me know! I can help get you a great deal on one! |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
Agreed. On a 2v mod motor N/A it is not going to be the most DD friendly. If you want 400+ you're going to have to put a power adder on it hands down, I don't care what anybody says. Any body that says otherwise is a bucket full o' sh!t. 200k is a lot on a stock motor. My personal opinions is: A) Get a used low mileage PI motor out of a mustang and drop it in yours and throw a power adder on it. You will be happy with the power it's making for the time being. Turbo is going to get you over 400 rwhp the easiest with less boost (costs more, initially). You can do it with a blower as well (costs less, initially), but you're going have to push more boost to get the results you want which is also pushing the block more. B) Buy a mustang with the power adder on it already and have a nice down payment on one and then DD your 200k mustang like 2001bullitt said. If you do it that way you can have all the down time in the world for your 400+ mustang while you do other things to it as time and money allows. Trust me I wish I had a DD so I don't have to worry about down time on my Bullitt. Right now I can't afford down time. My personal choice is B. There are a thousand different options/avenues to take. What do you want? A 400+ mustang is easy to figure out. The route to that 400+ is going to be the big factor.
Start with the basics like I showed you above and watch your mustang grow little by little. You'll get more satisfaction out of building a car bit by bit vs. buying a 400+ car outright. Unless it's 2001bullitt's red mustang. I can personally vouch for the power and potential it has. And yes it's over 400 to those neigh sayers. |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2001 Cobra
14.2@102 (I suck)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,621
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I would suggest getting an 03 or 04 cobra motor + TRANNY. thats 390. hardly tune it and you get 400.
__________________
![]() 2001 Cobra with SRA swap, modded for twisties ![]() MM Cobra Club Member #76 |
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: BFE
Posts: 2,821
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
where are these 400+ hp N/A 2v cars????? Its a BITCH to get a 3v to those numbers. (I'm seriously not trying to say the 3v is "far superior" or anything, just curious)
and to the OP.........Buy a 2 or 3k dollar DD car. THEN you can start building the stang the way you REALLY want it. Put a built motor in it. Run it N/A with a little spray until you can save for a blower. Have fun with the mustang and don't worry about having to drive it every day. Don't be in a rush to get a part installed so you can drive it tomorrow to work.
__________________
Bassani Crew Member #3 |
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: BFE
Posts: 2,821
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
and i'm still curious about my question^^
__________________
Bassani Crew Member #3 |
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: BFE
Posts: 2,821
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Nobody?!?!? hmmmmmm........
__________________
Bassani Crew Member #3 |
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Priest of the Car Gods
|
Silver, the 3v *is* far superior to the 2v. The 2v just has enough aftermarket to play catch-up.
__________________
O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ TheUNZippee! is right! Let us all BOW to his unerring ways in a respectful, nay, obsequious manner! ![]() |
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: BFE
Posts: 2,821
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I still want to see proof of the remark that it is "easy" to get a 2v to 400 rwhp N/A.........I know the 3v is a far superior design, but this isn't a 3v vs. 2v argument (which is what I figured people would turn it into with me having a 3v and asking the question)...........I saw ONE 2v car that MIGHT have been pushing 400 on the SPEED channel one time, I think it was on Pass Time. In a sn95 with a carb 4.6...........it was a fully built motor and no telling how much $$ in it. Ran low 11s n/a. I'm just curious is all. I'm not really technically "calling" anyone out, but someone stated they have built many 2Vs and they know what they are capable of. I don't recall who it was but it was in the thread. I'm wondering how many 400 hp 2vs they have built.
__________________
Bassani Crew Member #3 |
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Enthusiast
89 Mustang Lx
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 527
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I would honestly look upon the 4 valve but if you would prefer keeping things as simple as possible, I would go snag the 3v heads and intake and you can achieve what you want. FF&MM magazine has a 3v setup that ran an 8.48 at 139. Of course it was probably sponsered and he had over $100,000 from that but you can acheive the same without paying so much. 3v Heads, aluminum intake, tune ($275 tuner on ebay), Forged pistons or what you have with a stroker crank and hyper pistons and 290* cams would put you close to 10.5-11.1 compression and you should acheive what you are looking for. Or like Mr. "Money aint a thang" that hoped my ass a second ago, you could do the 3v swap and smack a Cobra supercharger or Wolly Mammoth blower on top and throw a tune to it and achieve what you are looking for... Just kidding with you to Mr Money aint a thang.
__________________
94-95 306, B-Cam, Off-brand BBK Like Headers, H-Pipe, 3.73's, Nitrous Wet Shot 175 Shot |
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Enthusiast
89 Mustang Lx
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rockwall, Texas
Posts: 527
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
94-95 306, B-Cam, Off-brand BBK Like Headers, H-Pipe, 3.73's, Nitrous Wet Shot 175 Shot Last edited by teal89; September 3rd, 2009 at 07:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2003 Mustang GT
9.0 in the 8th
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,194
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
I owned a 97 gt and now i have an 03 gt. for a long time it seems ive been sratching my head trying to figure out what set up to go with to get about 400 to 450hp. this is what i came up with.......i think we can all agree for a 2v to get 400 or 450 your gona have to spend some serious cash. after YEARS of thinking about what to do, ive decided to go with the '03 4v motor. sure it costs some money to get one and install but think about it. where you START with a '03 4v is where you want to END with a 2v. we can all agree the hp addiction doesnt just end there. at least with a 4v you have a good start if u wanna go more. 2v- heads, cams, f/i, rebuilt 200K mile motor= just about a GOOD chunk of ur 10K and about 450HP best case scenario. 4v- stock motor, smaller pulley, exhaust, tune=$$ to spare, nice start and about 500hp. that doesnt even account for the tranny u have get also which ur still gona have plenty of money to do so. cobra guys are ditchin those for cheap. and if you cant get a f/i 4v u can get a non f/i 4v. the 03 and 04 guys are ditching their eatons for dirt cheap and goin with turbos and kb. sure its not the greatest s/c BUT it will def get you some decent hp.
Once again thats my 2 cents and what IM gonna do. def what not what you have to do. BUT def worth thinking about man. and im sure theres a few guys in here that would agree with me.
__________________
C&L CAI, 75 TB, Plenum, O/R H Pipe, SLP LM1's (Dumped), Eibach SS, Tokico S/S, Moser 31 Splines, Cobra Diff, FRPP 410's, XCal 3 93 Tune
Last edited by takiller; September 13th, 2009 at 11:20 AM. |
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Enthusiast
2003 mustang GT
never tried
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: jersey
Posts: 543
![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
wait. save more money, buy a 03/04 cobra with about 50k miles. then just buy a bigger pulley for 80bucks and you have yourself 430 rwhp and people who know a decent amount about cars will respect your car, they wont just be like "oooh mustang goes fasttt" they be like "ooo cobra ooo" plus all your internals are forged and rear end can handle upwards of 500hp. its the BEST platform from the factory... and no offense dude.. 96 is a pretty crappy mustang like please dont take that to offense, i have a mustang you have a mustang, were brothers, but im saying from a technical point of view, the 96 pi motors only have about 226 from teh factory, plus, 200k miles later, probably 215. also the terminators look drop dead gorgeous in every color.
oh hey,,, or you could always get a mach 1. thats a nice platform. 4v is def a good thing. =] |
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Enthusiast
2003 mustang GT
never tried
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: jersey
Posts: 543
![]() iTrader: 4 reviews
|
and i didnt eralize after i wrote my quick reply that there was more to the thread. page 2 remained unread. so,, i basiaclly said everything that was alrady said. so lets not tear my ass open bc i didnt read it fully.. thanks
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/modular-mustangs/133664-best-way-achieve-400-rwhp.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| burnout at the wash - Car Videos on StreetFire | This thread | Refback | March 31st, 2010 10:39 PM | |
Threads Similar to: best way to achieve 400+rwhp?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| will i ever be able to exceed 400 plus rwhp? | pimpdout98gt | 96-98 | 34 | September 13th, 2008 01:36 PM |
| 400+ rwhp, what clutch for a daily driver? rush hour traffic | silvel2edge | 2005 - 2010 | 7 | June 1st, 2007 06:00 PM |
| TRYING TO GET TO GET IN BETWEEN 375-400 RWHP. | hockeytemperty | 2005 - 2010 | 2 | May 23rd, 2007 05:19 AM |
| My Goal is 400 RWHP...tell me what u think | StuTheMusicEngineer | 99-04 | 14 | March 3rd, 2007 07:06 PM |