| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
2006 mustang gt
dont know
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: wewoka, oklahoma
Posts: 115
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
help cam or turbo
i just bought a 06 gt with a k&n cold air intake and hurst short throw shifter and i am wanting to make it faster and still wanting to keep gas millage and still b a everyday driver would cams or a turbo b the better way to go and also if you could give me some hp gains and $$$$'s thanks
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
13.9@101
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 805
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Both!
__________________
![]() 13.9@101 before some mods |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1996 Mustang GT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Effingham, IL
Posts: 1,795
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
wow man, there is a huge price difference between those two options. if money is not an issue go with the turbo. but if you dont want to spend that much, get some cams. you could also get some gears or exhaust.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
One Man Wolf Pack
|
well there is a huge difference between the two. you will get the most HP gains with the turbo. the cams will be about $1400 installed, but the turbo will be between $6000-$6500.
__________________
![]() ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Newbie
|
Turbo around $5800.00 and 10 hrs for a DIY very easy installation and kit comes complete with program, 483hp at only 10lbs of boost on a stock motor turbo has room to grow and if you do some bottom end work and bring up the boost you can get 600+hp at 16lbs of boost
__________________
07 Mustang GT Granatelli Motor Sports Show Vehicle 98 Mustang Cobra Convertible 06 Charger RT 05 RS1 Scion Custom Show Car 70 Fiat 500 Abarth Pinafarina Body rare car Nascar Vehicle New Project comming soon
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
One Man Wolf Pack
|
well the install isn't easy for the average joe and what about a custom dyno tune?
__________________
![]() ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular
2006 mustang gt
dont know
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: wewoka, oklahoma
Posts: 115
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
thanks i think i am go n to go ahead and get cams. i got true dual flows and a hypertech tuner but i dont think it really done anything so i will prob get 3.73 gears and cams but with the cams do i need to do anything to the engine.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
¡ʇsnq ɹo uʍop ǝpısdn
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Looking for free hand jobs in poland springs nebraska... silly gooses
Posts: 12,551
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
TURBO!!
cuz then you can get a cam to make the turbo work even better later ... ... not make it work better ..but help the engine perform better with the turbo
__________________
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
One Man Wolf Pack
|
man go with the turbo. its more expensive but far more effective.
__________________
![]() ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Regular
2000 GT
slow
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: so cal
Posts: 183
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
both and ported heads
__________________
Hourofpain wrote: girls always think its cute when we try to do stuff that we cant do good idea.. nba.. next time you have a date, take her to a garage and let her watch you work on a car |
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1998 Z28
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,196
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I agree Both if you have the money but if not I like to get the most out of a car N/A first then add the forced induction!
__________________
Unknown
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
turbo FTW!!!
__________________
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 2,241
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I would go turbo. Yes, the turbo setup is more expensive, but the power potential from a turbo is well above and beyond a cam, especially with some bottom end work. Crank that boost!!!
Plus if your trying to get a really good gain from the cam, it's gonna eat your gas milage and make it a not so fun DD. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Regular
2006 mustang gt
dont know
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: wewoka, oklahoma
Posts: 115
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
ok thanks well from what yall say i guess i am go n to go ahead and go with the turbo or maybe a supercharger i heard they both do about the sam and supercharger is safer yeah i got to keep that gas millage my car is an everyday driver
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
I Have Many Leather Bound Books
|
If you have the money, turbo. If you have more money, both. If you have little money, cams. If you have flaming shitpiles of money laying around, both, and buy me both as well. lol
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 2,241
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
I Have Many Leather Bound Books
|
Yes, my bad. Don't forget about him!
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: help cam or turbo
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Turbo is done, got a question for you turbo guru's | Regency 2007 | 2005 - 2010 | 33 | June 26th, 2007 08:46 AM |
| Supercharger, Twin Turbo, and Single Turbo | justinsstang | General Tech | 24 | March 7th, 2007 09:07 PM |
| Mellon's Twin Turbo Stealth vs Wills99z's Single Turbo z28 | Mellon | Videos | 10 | December 30th, 2006 10:05 AM |
| Turbo, Twin Turbo, Procharger, or Kennebell? | black94gt | 5.0 Mustangs | 19 | October 7th, 2006 10:41 AM |
| Super Charger vs Turbo/Twin Turbo: Pros and Cons of each | FireryDriver | 2005 - 2010 | 9 | September 17th, 2006 04:15 PM |