3.27 vs 3.73 vs 4.10 (took a couple hrs 2 complete... enjoy)

Scott2001GT · August 3rd, 2008, 04:05 AM

I have a 2001 GT AUTO. so how would that be for me. I am getting 4:10's with Diablo Tuner. B/c a top spped of 111MPH will not work for me. that is my average speed

DeMello · August 3rd, 2008, 04:26 AM

your top speed wont be 111

its different becuase you have an auto

im sure there are autos out there with 410s that cross the finsih line of the 1/4 mile at 120+

Scott2001GT · August 3rd, 2008, 09:18 PM

ok thanks bra. i mean i am makin it a 10 second car. so i mean 120 or even 120's won't do it. maybe just a tune? b/c drag cars got 4:33 and 5:13's

97GT4.6 · August 11th, 2008, 03:04 AM

There's no way in hell with four ten's that you would run outta gear at 110 with an automatic.

Scott2001GT · August 14th, 2008, 02:19 AM

ok good thats all i need to know! lol

97mustanggt · August 15th, 2008, 10:57 PM

hey 97 gt....16.5 in the quarter mile...serious...at least 14.5....what happened?

jjperl · August 30th, 2008, 12:20 AM

nice write up! Thanx

BamBam86 · September 3rd, 2008, 08:26 AM

Thats not a very accurate list. Has anyone seen a stock 2004 GT do 216 mph? or how about 197 mph? Didn't think so.

<a href="http://bambam86.21butrich.hop.clickbank.net">How A 21 Year Old College Dropout Became Millionaire On Internet?</a>

smithjohn · September 13th, 2008, 01:02 PM

hi

smithjohn · September 13th, 2008, 01:05 PM

hi this smith john that is very good to develope our skills and at the same time you be care full

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
smithjohn
used cars

Black Bullitt · September 18th, 2008, 03:16 PM

Not to be an @$$hat, but this was a little quicker than 2 hours and it has color...yay color.

This is for a t-3650:
Gear Tables

Scott2001GT · September 30th, 2008, 08:08 PM

now i think i am doing 4:30's!

Techniq · November 12th, 2008, 03:10 PM

Those are some fun facts... I like looking at specs. I have a Mach1 which I think is 3.55

moosenuk17 · November 15th, 2008, 12:24 PM

nice writeup

competition orange · November 20th, 2008, 01:37 AM

thanx for the info u helped make up my mind

svtkidd23 · November 27th, 2008, 11:00 AM

awsome!

Regulator · November 27th, 2008, 01:26 PM

Originally Posted by COSTANG

Ahh yes but the Orignal Thread's numbers show slower acceleration from the Lower gears???

Can someone clarify for me.

Lower gears (numerically higher like 4.10 for example) ACCELERATE the car up to speed faster, but in the end you would sacrifice potential top speed, which is what you can see in every gear. If you want to maintain the potential top speed you'd need to change the gearing of the transmission or turn more engine rpm.

Regulator · November 27th, 2008, 01:27 PM

[quote=BamBam86;1403222]Thats not a very accurate list. Has anyone seen a stock 2004 GT do 216 mph? or how about 197 mph? Didn't think so.QUOTE]

Top speed numbers listed are just what the gearing can do, they do not factor in things like road friction, air drag, etc. If you could somehow magically run the car in a vacuum environment, the car would theoretically be able to reach said top speeds.

TheBusher · December 6th, 2008, 10:25 PM

Originally Posted by 97mustanggt

hey 97 gt....16.5 in the quarter mile...serious...at least 14.5....what happened?

Altitude... He races up a 6000 ft. which equals an 18% loss in power.

TheBusher · December 6th, 2008, 10:36 PM

Originally Posted by BamBam86

Thats not a very accurate list. Has anyone seen a stock 2004 GT do 216 mph? or how about 197 mph? Didn't think so.

<a href="http://bambam86.21butrich.hop.clickbank.net">How A 21 Year Old College Dropout Became Millionaire On Internet?</a>

Is this a serious comment??? Of course a stock GT can't go 200+ mph, it struggles to reach 150 mph and aero drag increases exponentialy. All of the above is assuming you have the power to reach those speeds. It's more of a comparison 'guide'... not what you can really do stock.

August 11th, 2008, 03:04 AM	#44
97GT4.6 Hardcore Enthusiast 97 GT Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Fort Collins and Pueblo, Colorado Posts: 2,184	There's no way in hell with four ten's that you would run outta gear at 110 with an automatic. __________________ Cammed 2v Rules for Life: With Cars: Fast, Cheap, Reliable, Pick TWO With Women: Hot, Single, Mentally Stable, Pick TWO

September 13th, 2008, 01:02 PM	#49
smithjohn Newbie Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 2	http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/modular-mustangs/30116-3-27-vs-3-73-vs-4-10-took hi

September 13th, 2008, 01:05 PM	#50
smithjohn Newbie Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 2	http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/modular-mustangs/30116-3-27-vs-3-73-vs-4-10-took hi this smith john that is very good to develope our skills and at the same time you be care full -------------------------------------------------------------------------- smithjohn used cars

November 15th, 2008, 12:24 PM	#54
moosenuk17 MM Fanatic 2000 ford mustang GT i love lamp Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: lemoore CA/norfolk VA Posts: 3,610	nice writeup __________________ kenne bell supercharged 9psi, CMS stg 2 cams, 3.73, UPR upper/ lower control arms, 03/04 cobra rims and front a-arms, HR supersport springs, JLT CAI, and some other odds and ends

November 27th, 2008, 01:27 PM	#58
Regulator Regular 1999 Mustang GT Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Louisville, Ky Posts: 170	[quote=BamBam86;1403222]Thats not a very accurate list. Has anyone seen a stock 2004 GT do 216 mph? or how about 197 mph? Didn't think so.QUOTE] Top speed numbers listed are just what the gearing can do, they do not factor in things like road friction, air drag, etc. If you could somehow magically run the car in a vacuum environment, the car would theoretically be able to reach said top speeds. __________________ '99 GT FS/FT. Click here for details! "And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts, I looked and behold: a pale horse. And his name, that sat on him, was Death. And Hell followed with him."

August 3rd, 2008, 04:05 AM	#41
Scott2001GT MM Fanatic 2001 Mustang GT 13.874 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Missouri Posts: 3,378	I have a 2001 GT AUTO. so how would that be for me. I am getting 4:10's with Diablo Tuner. B/c a top spped of 111MPH will not work for me. that is my average speed

Sponsored Links	Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement

August 3rd, 2008, 04:26 AM	#42
DeMello Banned 01 nitrous injected GT 12s next time out... Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Florida Posts: 3,912	your top speed wont be 111 its different becuase you have an auto im sure there are autos out there with 410s that cross the finsih line of the 1/4 mile at 120+

August 3rd, 2008, 09:18 PM	#43
Scott2001GT MM Fanatic 2001 Mustang GT 13.874 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Missouri Posts: 3,378	ok thanks bra. i mean i am makin it a 10 second car. so i mean 120 or even 120's won't do it. maybe just a tune? b/c drag cars got 4:33 and 5:13's

August 14th, 2008, 02:19 AM	#45
Scott2001GT MM Fanatic 2001 Mustang GT 13.874 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Missouri Posts: 3,378	ok good thats all i need to know! lol

August 15th, 2008, 10:57 PM	#46
97mustanggt Enthusiast 97GT & 97Snake T.B.A Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Richgrove, Ca Posts: 988	hey 97 gt....16.5 in the quarter mile...serious...at least 14.5....what happened?

August 30th, 2008, 12:20 AM	#47
jjperl Newbie Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 19	nice write up! Thanx

September 3rd, 2008, 08:26 AM	#48
BamBam86 Newbie Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 4	Thats not a very accurate list. Has anyone seen a stock 2004 GT do 216 mph? or how about 197 mph? Didn't think so. <a href="http://bambam86.21butrich.hop.clickbank.net">How A 21 Year Old College Dropout Became Millionaire On Internet?</a>

September 30th, 2008, 08:08 PM	#52
Scott2001GT MM Fanatic 2001 Mustang GT 13.874 Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Missouri Posts: 3,378	now i think i am doing 4:30's!

November 12th, 2008, 03:10 PM	#53
Techniq Regular 2004 Mustang Mach 1 Will Run After Build! Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Belleview, FL Posts: 292	Those are some fun facts... I like looking at specs. I have a Mach1 which I think is 3.55

November 20th, 2008, 01:37 AM	#55
competition orange Regular 2004 mustang gt Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: uniontown,pennslyvania Posts: 216	thanx for the info u helped make up my mind

Threads Similar to: 3.27 vs 3.73 vs 4.10 (took a couple hrs 2 complete... enjoy)
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
3.27 vs 3.73 vs 4.10 (Took A Couple Hrs 2 Complete... Enjoy)	TheBusher	99-04	51	November 20th, 2007 02:30 PM
If you enjoy this then you're a ricist	Iridium	The Clubhouse	8	July 1st, 2007 03:04 AM
hmusn will enjoy this	232stang	The Clubhouse	8	June 20th, 2007 10:06 AM
A firebird for anyone to enjoy.	GTsetGO	Multimedia	1	October 19th, 2006 12:43 AM
Ok Ok - Couldn't Help Myself - Enjoy	marknlori	V6 Mustangs	3	September 21st, 2006 04:53 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 AM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

3.27 vs 3.73 vs 4.10 (took a couple hrs 2 complete... enjoy)

http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/modular-mustangs/30116-3-27-vs-3-73-vs-4-10-took

http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/modular-mustangs/30116-3-27-vs-3-73-vs-4-10-took