| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack (21) | Thread Tools |
|
|
#41 |
|
BYAHHHH!
2001 Mustang GT
13.874
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 14,628
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
I have a 2001 GT AUTO. so how would that be for me. I am getting 4:10's with Diablo Tuner. B/c a top spped of 111MPH will not work for me. that is my average speed
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#42 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,965
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
your top speed wont be 111
its different becuase you have an auto im sure there are autos out there with 410s that cross the finsih line of the 1/4 mile at 120+
__________________
Just Another Bolt on GT [IMG]http://i45.tinypic.com/54f5ua.jpg[/IMG] Stock Longblock - 287/276 Low 12s NA! 10s on the spray? |
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
There's no way in hell with four ten's that you would run outta gear at 110 with an automatic.
__________________
![]() Cammed 2v Built By MustangMatt More mods than times your daughter has slept around |
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
97GT & 97Snake & 00L
T.B.A
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Richgrove, Ca
Posts: 2,196
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
hey 97 gt....16.5 in the quarter mile...serious...at least 14.5....what happened?
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 19
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
nice write up! Thanx
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 4
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Thats not a very accurate list. Has anyone seen a stock 2004 GT do 216 mph? or how about 197 mph? Didn't think so.
<a href="http://bambam86.21butrich.hop.clickbank.net">How A 21 Year Old College Dropout Became Millionaire On Internet?</a> |
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/modular-mustangs/30116-3-27-vs-3-73-vs-4-10-took
hi
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/modular-mustangs/30116-3-27-vs-3-73-vs-4-10-took
hi this smith john that is very good to develope our skills and at the same time you be care full
![]() -------------------------------------------------------------------------- smithjohn used cars |
|
|
|
#51 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
Not to be an @$$hat, but this was a little quicker than 2 hours and it has color...yay color.
This is for a t-3650: Gear Tables |
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Regular
|
Those are some fun facts... I like looking at specs. I have a Mach1 which I think is 3.55
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
MM Fanatic
|
nice writeup
__________________
![]() 2000 kenne bell GT (440HP-432TQ) Tuned by Joe at http://www.tricktuners.com dyno vid:http://youtu.be/lr3xpxw2_v8 2011 escape MUSTANG TAT CREW |
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Regular
2004 mustang gt
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: uniontown,pennslyvania
Posts: 365
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
thanx for the info u helped make up my mind
|
|
|
|
#56 |
|
MM.s Used Car Whore
2011 F150 XLT 4x4 5.0
14.89
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colonial Beach Va
Posts: 3,545
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
awsome!
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Regular
|
Lower gears (numerically higher like 4.10 for example) ACCELERATE the car up to speed faster, but in the end you would sacrifice potential top speed, which is what you can see in every gear. If you want to maintain the potential top speed you'd need to change the gearing of the transmission or turn more engine rpm.
__________________
'99 GT FS/FT. Click here for details! ![]() "And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts, I looked and behold: a pale horse. And his name, that sat on him, was Death. And Hell followed with him." |
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Regular
|
[QUOTE=BamBam86;1403222]Thats not a very accurate list. Has anyone seen a stock 2004 GT do 216 mph? or how about 197 mph? Didn't think so.QUOTE]
Top speed numbers listed are just what the gearing can do, they do not factor in things like road friction, air drag, etc. If you could somehow magically run the car in a vacuum environment, the car would theoretically be able to reach said top speeds.
__________________
'99 GT FS/FT. Click here for details! ![]() "And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts, I looked and behold: a pale horse. And his name, that sat on him, was Death. And Hell followed with him." |
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 2,242
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Altitude... He races up a 6000 ft. which equals an 18% loss in power.
__________________
Last edited by TheBusher; December 6th, 2008 at 10:37 PM. |
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Chevrolet Impala
???
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 2,242
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Is this a serious comment??? Of course a stock GT can't go 200+ mph, it struggles to reach 150 mph and aero drag increases exponentialy. All of the above is assuming you have the power to reach those speeds. It's more of a comparison 'guide'... not what you can really do stock.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 3.27 vs 3.73 vs 4.10 (took a couple hrs 2 complete... enjoy)
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3.27 vs 3.73 vs 4.10 (Took A Couple Hrs 2 Complete... Enjoy) | TheBusher | 99-04 | 76 | January 28th, 2011 02:23 PM |
| If you enjoy this then you're a ricist | Iridium | The Clubhouse | 8 | July 1st, 2007 03:04 AM |
| hmusn will enjoy this | 232stang | The Clubhouse | 8 | June 20th, 2007 10:06 AM |
| A firebird for anyone to enjoy. | GTsetGO | Multimedia | 1 | October 19th, 2006 12:43 AM |
| Ok Ok - Couldn't Help Myself - Enjoy | marknlori | V6 Mustangs | 3 | September 21st, 2006 04:53 PM |