Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Modular Mustangs

Discussing WTF Is A Modular Mustang? in the Modular Mustangs Forum. new to this car, wtf is a modular mustang??...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old November 29th, 2007, 04:33 AM   #1
Regular
 
dansgt's Avatar
 
2003 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 172
Default

WTF Is A Modular Mustang?


new to this car, wtf is a modular mustang??
 
Old November 29th, 2007, 05:10 AM   #2
MM Fanatic
 
SWEET2KSTANG's Avatar
 
2000 mustang gt
12.01@114.69
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 4,401
Default

over head cam engine. 4.6 and 5.4 starting from 96 in the mustangs. the first ford modular 4.6 came in the early 90's in another vehicle.
__________________
stock long block, bolt ons, slicks, and a little squeeze
1/4 E.T. 12.06@114.69



Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
1. Jesus Christ
2. The American G. I.

One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
 
Old November 29th, 2007, 05:12 AM   #3
Regular
 
dansgt's Avatar
 
2003 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 172
Default

ah i understand now thanks man.
 
Old November 29th, 2007, 05:25 AM   #4
MM Fanatic
 
SWEET2KSTANG's Avatar
 
2000 mustang gt
12.01@114.69
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 4,401
Default

no problem.
__________________
stock long block, bolt ons, slicks, and a little squeeze
1/4 E.T. 12.06@114.69



Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you:
1. Jesus Christ
2. The American G. I.

One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
 
Old November 29th, 2007, 08:01 AM   #5
Enthusiast
 
Eagle2000GT's Avatar
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 623
Default

Modular Mustangs have modular motors. According to what I've read, the name of the motor comes from the type assembly line that its made on. The assembly lines were designed in a modular fashion to facilitate quick change overs.
__________________
latest tune: 370 rwhp/377 rwtq
Garage: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...-member-11329/
Previously Owned:
1966 Coronet 500, 426 ci est. 290-300 rwhp
1969 Camaro RS/SS, 350 ci est. 210-220 rwhp
Today is the real muscle car era.
 
Old November 30th, 2007, 10:26 AM   #6
Regular
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 426
Default

Originally Posted by Eagle2000GT View Post
Modular Mustangs have modular motors. According to what I've read, the name of the motor comes from the type assembly line that its made on. The assembly lines were designed in a modular fashion to facilitate quick change overs.
You've got it--the modular part does indeed refer to the machining and assembly lines, not any characteristic of the engine or its close relatives...
__________________
-cliff knight-
My Mustang GT

2003 GT, UPR X, Magnaflow, 180° stat,
PP 70mm TB & plenum, Sniper tuned
3.73s, 252 rwHP/296 ft.lb.
Multi-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
 
Old November 30th, 2007, 10:40 AM   #7
Maintenance Man
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
2002 Mustang GT
11.47@120.58
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 3,945
Default

Ford's Modular Engine History


According to Wikipedia:

Contrary to popular belief, the Modular engine did not get its name from its design or sharing of certain parts among the engine family. Instead, the name was derived from a manufacturing plant protocol, "Modular", where the plant and its tooling could be changed out in a matter of hours to manufacture different versions of the engine family.
Includes engines such as the 4.6, 5.4, 6.8 V10, even a 5.0 Cammer. And, while supposedly it has nothing to do with interchangeable parts - because of the manufacturing process many of the parts are interchangeable (and often the same or very similar). It makes building parts and vehicles much more cost effective.
 
Old December 15th, 2007, 11:06 AM   #8
Banned
 
2002 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 170
Default

the mod motor has it's upsides and fallbacks.

upsides are they are incredibly strong and long lasting motors. friend of mine has a 2001 V6, and she has over 200,000 miles and other than normal maintenance (spark plugs, tires, oil change etc) the only thing she has had to replace is her alternator.

downside is, they are pain in the ass and very costly to get horsepower out of them without some sort of turbo, s/c, or Nitrous, but they are a very friendly FI motor if you throw some forged internals in.
 
Old December 15th, 2007, 11:16 AM   #9
Resident Bubblehead
 
00vabchgt's Avatar
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 4,552
Default

Originally Posted by SWEET2KSTANG View Post
over head cam engine. 4.6 and 5.4 starting from 96 in the mustangs. the first ford modular 4.6 came in the early 90's in another vehicle.
that would be the '92 Crown Vic
__________________
Submariners Do It Deeper

Military Crew
MM1 (SS)
Bluenose
US Navy Veteran
Originally Posted by MamaStang View Post
"Boy Danny....nice cock ya got there. "
 
Old December 15th, 2007, 11:39 AM   #10
Regular
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 426
Default

2001 V-6 is not a modular motor...

they are pain in the ass and very costly to get horsepower out of them without some sort of turbo, s/c, or Nitrous...
Compared to what?

I don't know why this notion is so often put forth. There is nothing fundamental to the modular series' design that makes it any less capable of being pumped up than any other OEM engine. In fact, one could argue that the OHC design makes it inherently capable of providing more potential.

A wide variety of heads, intakes, cams, internals and all the other stuff are readily available at prices comparable to those of similar displacement pushrod engines--making power costs money and it really doesn't matter if you start with a stock 4.6L modular, or a stock 5.0 pushrod engine.

The only real difference is that there exists much more practical knowledge and experience in modding the older motors, and perhaps that there are a lot more 5.0 donor and aftermarket blocks (and other parts) out there. However both these factors are changing as time goes by...
__________________
-cliff knight-
My Mustang GT

2003 GT, UPR X, Magnaflow, 180° stat,
PP 70mm TB & plenum, Sniper tuned
3.73s, 252 rwHP/296 ft.lb.
Multi-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
 
Old December 15th, 2007, 11:41 AM   #11
Banned
 
2002 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 170
Default

Originally Posted by cliffyk View Post
2001 V-6 is not a modular motor...



Compared to what?

I don't know why this notion is so often put forth. There is nothing fundamental to the modular series' design that makes it any less capable of being pumped up than any other OEM engine. In fact, one could argue that the OHC design makes it inherently capable of providing more potential.

A wide variety of heads, intakes, cams, internals and all the other stuff are readily available at prices comparable to those of similar displacement pushrod engines--making power costs money and it really doesn't matter if you start with a stock 4.6L modular, or a stock 5.0 pushrod engine.

The only real difference is that there exists much more practical knowledge and experience in modding the older motors, and perhaps that there are a lot more 5.0 donor and aftermarket blocks (and other parts) out there. However both these factors are changing as time goes by...
man you can stick some cams, headers, intake, and heads on a 5.0 and get 100 hp out of it...you can't do that with a mod motor.

at best you might get 20 or 30 hp...and you spend a crap load more.
 
Old December 15th, 2007, 12:31 PM   #12
Regular
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 426
Default

Originally Posted by mixedbreed02gt View Post
man you can stick some cams, headers, intake, and heads on a 5.0 and get 100 hp out of it...you can't do that with a mod motor.

at best you might get 20 or 30 hp...and you spend a crap load more.
Cams, and IHE mods will get you more than 20 to 30 HP on a 4.6L-2V; IHE and a good tune alone will get you 35+ HP** vs. stock, add longtubes and cams (depending on what cams you select) and there's easily another 40 to 60+ there.

A stock '94-'95 5.0 starts out at around 180 rwHP so adding 100 HP gets you to 280.

A stock 4.6L 2V starts out around 210 rwHP, so adding 80 (30 from IHE, 50 from cams--for sake of argument) gets you to 290 (from a smaller displacement engine). Here's a place that did it.

It would cost more, that's a fact--mostly because it will cost $400+ to buy a tuner or get a tune, and 4.6L piece/parts are a bit more expensive than the 5.0 stuff (but again, that is changing)...

------------------------
** I got my '03 with an o/r road H-pipe and welded in Flowmaster 40s (that all, no intake work, no tune), and it dynoed at 220/243 rwHP/torque.

On my last dyno (on Halloweeen) I got 252/296 HP/tq--this with a UPR catted X-pipe, Magnaflow catback, Prod Prods 70 mm TB and plenem, stock intake, and a Sinper 93 octane tune)--this is 32 HP over my baseline, long tubes would add at least another 10 to 15 HP.
__________________
-cliff knight-
My Mustang GT

2003 GT, UPR X, Magnaflow, 180° stat,
PP 70mm TB & plenum, Sniper tuned
3.73s, 252 rwHP/296 ft.lb.
Multi-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
 
Old December 18th, 2007, 01:17 PM   #13
Editor
 
Smoothgrandmama's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Willis,Texas
Posts: 2,080
Default

Originally Posted by mixedbreed02gt View Post
man you can stick some cams, headers, intake, and heads on a 5.0 and get 100 hp out of it...you can't do that with a mod motor.

at best you might get 20 or 30 hp...and you spend a crap load more.
You Would get At Least 60-70 hp out of that much work.
Several People in the 99-04 section have done so.
__________________
"The issue of Prayer is not prayer itself, The issue of Prayer is God"
 
Old December 19th, 2007, 11:56 AM   #14
Regular
 
98 Mustang GT
12.85
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Danville, IN
Posts: 69
Default

Comparing them as to what you can do to get power is apples and oranges. These engines make power in different ways. You have a better low rpm torque potential with the pushrod stuff and a better high rpm potential with the overhead cam stuff. Very different.

With the pushrod stuff there is a butt ton of product out there. For the modular stuff there is still a lot of catching up to do. But the gap is closing fast.

Price to mod was the biggest difference and that is now becoming more equal as well.

It's just different between the 2 types of engines and both have their strengths and weaknesses.

Darrin
 
Old December 19th, 2007, 03:33 PM   #15
Newbie
 
Sil03R6'07PNY's Avatar
 
2004 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Holloman AFB, NM Kunsan AB, Korea
Posts: 19
Default

well that's great now i know what that term actually means. cause i was kinda wondering that myself
 
Old January 14th, 2008, 11:40 AM   #16
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Hourofpain's Avatar
 
1998 Mustang Gt
14 MPG
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,202
Default

Originally Posted by Darrin View Post
Comparing them as to what you can do to get power is apples and oranges. These engines make power in different ways. You have a better low rpm torque potential with the pushrod stuff and a better high rpm potential with the overhead cam stuff. Very different.

With the pushrod stuff there is a butt ton of product out there. For the modular stuff there is still a lot of catching up to do. But the gap is closing fast.

Price to mod was the biggest difference and that is now becoming more equal as well.

It's just different between the 2 types of engines and both have their strengths and weaknesses.

Darrin
yet you never really explained the difference
__________________
1998 Mustang Gt

4.10 Gears...Stage 3 Clutch...Aluminum Intake Manifold...Hurst Short throw...Underdrive pulleys...Bassani X Exhaust...Under bumper Ram Air Intake...Livewire Performance Ignition...Rear Drag Springs
 
Old January 14th, 2008, 12:38 PM   #17
Regular
 
98 Mustang GT
12.85
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Danville, IN
Posts: 69
Default

Originally Posted by Hourofpain View Post
yet you never really explained the difference
Here is some helpful info

Modular Mix & Match, Part 1--Muscle Mustangs & Fast Fords Magazine

Darrin
 
Old January 14th, 2008, 01:33 PM   #18
Regular
 
2006 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gardena, Ca
Posts: 498
Default

wow this thread is soooo educating! im not drunk (or gay) but i freaken love u guys!
__________________
Vroom <~~~ Stock

Vr0oOm <~~~~ me

2006 silver/Black, red interior, moon roof, shaker 1000

JLT Cai, Steeda TB spacer, Hurst Short Throw Shifter, Pypes O/R H, MangaFlow AxelBack, Diablo Pedator...
 
Old January 26th, 2008, 07:42 AM   #19
Newbie
 
rsfdiver's Avatar
 
2007 GT500, 2007 V6 Conv.
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 28
Default

Thanks for all the info I will follow this thread also
 
Old January 27th, 2008, 12:30 AM   #20
Regular
 
Countryboy_99's Avatar
 
'95 GT
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: I forgot so I live in the 'Stang...
Posts: 254
Default

I gotta say I like the 5.0 pushrod more between the two although there's startin to be more available mod oppurtunities for the modulars...
just cuz im sportin one in my car ya know... but the chicky's do love that rumble that 4.6's dont quite seem to have...
oh and is it just me or do 5.0's have a tendency to launch harder?
oh and do they make a modular 5.0?
__________________
Dont mind me...

I just float in and out of the forums at random... lol
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: WTF Is A Modular Mustang?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Big Numbers From A Modular? Badasstang281 99-04 25 November 23rd, 2007 06:37 PM
Should I? (Modular Fox) invisa stang 5.0 Mustangs 28 November 19th, 2007 08:26 PM
Modular Motors? Eminembdg 99-04 6 May 8th, 2007 09:02 PM
Modular fhinesley 99-04 3 March 8th, 2007 11:22 PM
MODULAR ENGINE SWAP IN A 1968 MUSTANG.... BIGBUB1968 Classic Mustangs 9 February 14th, 2007 09:55 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.