| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
03 gt, 95 740i, 96 disco
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mo
Posts: 1,298
![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
WTF Is A Modular Mustang?
new to this car, wtf is a modular mustang??
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,542
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 8 reviews
|
over head cam engine. 4.6 and 5.4 starting from 96 in the mustangs. the first ford modular 4.6 came in the early 90's in another vehicle.
__________________
![]() project warhorse under construction wagon burner under construction as well (04 lightning) being built by MP2 Performance |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
03 gt, 95 740i, 96 disco
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mo
Posts: 1,298
![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
ah i understand now thanks man.
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
mm's nitrous mod
2000 mustang gt
11.79@115.83 (old set up)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: N.W. AR
Posts: 12,542
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 8 reviews
|
no problem.
__________________
![]() project warhorse under construction wagon burner under construction as well (04 lightning) being built by MP2 Performance |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2000 Mustang GT
12.73@111.36
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 5,316
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Modular Mustangs have modular motors. According to what I've read, the name of the motor comes from the type assembly line that its made on. The assembly lines were designed in a modular fashion to facilitate quick change overs.
__________________
ProCharger P-1SC, 9 psi, STD 396/383; Uncorrected 388/375; SAE 383/370 Mods list in Garage. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
You've got it--the modular part does indeed refer to the machining and assembly lines, not any characteristic of the engine or its close relatives...
__________________
-cliff knight- My Mustang 2003 GT, UPR X, 24lb/h injectors, Magnaflow, 180° stat, PP 70mm TB & plenum, DF Commando, Steeda UDPs, Ralco RZ_flywheel, RAM HDX clutch, WX EFX COPs 3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 lb-ft. Flex-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
MM Fanatic
2002 Mustang GT
11.47@120.58
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 3,940
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Ford's Modular Engine History
According to Wikipedia:
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
|
the mod motor has it's upsides and fallbacks.
upsides are they are incredibly strong and long lasting motors. friend of mine has a 2001 V6, and she has over 200,000 miles and other than normal maintenance (spark plugs, tires, oil change etc) the only thing she has had to replace is her alternator. downside is, they are pain in the ass and very costly to get horsepower out of them without some sort of turbo, s/c, or Nitrous, but they are a very friendly FI motor if you throw some forged internals in.
__________________
[URL="http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2522054/1"][SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][/URL] [URL="http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2522054"] My Car Domain Website[/URL] Entertaining Offers For My 2002 Mustang GT [URL]http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/sale/57736-entertaining-offers-my-2002-mustang-gt.html[/URL] |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Resident Bubblehead
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Haymarket, VA
Posts: 6,045
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
2001 V-6 is not a modular motor...
I don't know why this notion is so often put forth. There is nothing fundamental to the modular series' design that makes it any less capable of being pumped up than any other OEM engine. In fact, one could argue that the OHC design makes it inherently capable of providing more potential. A wide variety of heads, intakes, cams, internals and all the other stuff are readily available at prices comparable to those of similar displacement pushrod engines--making power costs money and it really doesn't matter if you start with a stock 4.6L modular, or a stock 5.0 pushrod engine. The only real difference is that there exists much more practical knowledge and experience in modding the older motors, and perhaps that there are a lot more 5.0 donor and aftermarket blocks (and other parts) out there. However both these factors are changing as time goes by...
__________________
-cliff knight- My Mustang 2003 GT, UPR X, 24lb/h injectors, Magnaflow, 180° stat, PP 70mm TB & plenum, DF Commando, Steeda UDPs, Ralco RZ_flywheel, RAM HDX clutch, WX EFX COPs 3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 lb-ft. Flex-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Banned
|
at best you might get 20 or 30 hp...and you spend a crap load more.
__________________
[URL="http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2522054/1"][SIGPIC][/SIGPIC][/URL] [URL="http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2522054"] My Car Domain Website[/URL] Entertaining Offers For My 2002 Mustang GT [URL]http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/sale/57736-entertaining-offers-my-2002-mustang-gt.html[/URL] |
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 1,816
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
A stock '94-'95 5.0 starts out at around 180 rwHP so adding 100 HP gets you to 280. A stock 4.6L 2V starts out around 210 rwHP, so adding 80 (30 from IHE, 50 from cams--for sake of argument) gets you to 290 (from a smaller displacement engine). Here's a place that did it. It would cost more, that's a fact--mostly because it will cost $400+ to buy a tuner or get a tune, and 4.6L piece/parts are a bit more expensive than the 5.0 stuff (but again, that is changing)... ------------------------ ** I got my '03 with an o/r road H-pipe and welded in Flowmaster 40s (that all, no intake work, no tune), and it dynoed at 220/243 rwHP/torque. On my last dyno (on Halloweeen) I got 252/296 HP/tq--this with a UPR catted X-pipe, Magnaflow catback, Prod Prods 70 mm TB and plenem, stock intake, and a Sinper 93 octane tune)--this is 32 HP over my baseline, long tubes would add at least another 10 to 15 HP.
__________________
-cliff knight- My Mustang 2003 GT, UPR X, 24lb/h injectors, Magnaflow, 180° stat, PP 70mm TB & plenum, DF Commando, Steeda UDPs, Ralco RZ_flywheel, RAM HDX clutch, WX EFX COPs 3.73s, 262 rwHP/305 lb-ft. Flex-fuel: burns gas and rubber...
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Assistant to the Manager
|
Several People in the 99-04 section have done so.
__________________
Join The MM Facebook: Modded Mustangs Facebook Vote For Modded Mustangs Ride of the Month Eskimo Brothers To Smooth: Safi, Blitz34, Graystang01, WillTheThrill, Bwal, 101Fng |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Regular
98 Mustang GT
12.85
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Danville, IN
Posts: 69
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Comparing them as to what you can do to get power is apples and oranges. These engines make power in different ways. You have a better low rpm torque potential with the pushrod stuff and a better high rpm potential with the overhead cam stuff. Very different.
With the pushrod stuff there is a butt ton of product out there. For the modular stuff there is still a lot of catching up to do. But the gap is closing fast. Price to mod was the biggest difference and that is now becoming more equal as well. It's just different between the 2 types of engines and both have their strengths and weaknesses. Darrin |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Newbie
|
well that's great now i know what that term actually means. cause i was kinda wondering that myself
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2005 Torrid Red GTO m6
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,524
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
1996 Cobra To be sold... 2005 M6 Twin Turbo GTO Torrid Red Fully Forged LS2 Block Built to handle 1000RWHP. Fully ported Dart Heads. Edelbrock Jr Intake. Custom cut upper intake plenum. APS twin Turbo System with APS twin Fuel pumps. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Regular
98 Mustang GT
12.85
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Danville, IN
Posts: 69
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Enthusiast
|
wow this thread is soooo educating! im not drunk (or gay) but i freaken love u guys!
__________________
Vroom <~~~ Stock Vr0oOm <~~~~ me 2006 silver/Black, red interior, moon roof, shaker 1000 JLT Cai, Steeda TB spacer, Hurst Short Throw Shifter, Pypes O/R H, MangaFlow AxelBack, Diablo Pedator... |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Newbie
|
Thanks for all the info I will follow this thread also
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Enthusiast
'95 GT
Was probably faster before I got it.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wichita, Kansas
Posts: 861
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I gotta say I like the 5.0 pushrod more between the two although there's startin to be more available mod oppurtunities for the modulars...
just cuz im sportin one in my car ya know... but the chicky's do love that rumble that 4.6's dont quite seem to have... oh and is it just me or do 5.0's have a tendency to launch harder? oh and do they make a modular 5.0?
__________________
Its red, long, and comes with an 8 foot bed attached. Wanna come play with it? ![]()
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: WTF Is A Modular Mustang?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Big Numbers From A Modular? | Badasstang281 | 99-04 | 25 | November 23rd, 2007 06:37 PM |
| Should I? (Modular Fox) | invisa stang | 5.0 Mustangs | 28 | November 19th, 2007 08:26 PM |
| Modular Motors? | Eminembdg | 99-04 | 6 | May 8th, 2007 09:02 PM |
| Modular | fhinesley | 99-04 | 3 | March 8th, 2007 11:22 PM |
| MODULAR ENGINE SWAP IN A 1968 MUSTANG.... | BIGBUB1968 | Classic Mustangs | 9 | February 14th, 2007 09:55 PM |