RPM limits of a stock 4.6.
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Modular Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old January 3rd, 2008, 02:22 PM   #1
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
ModMustang97GT's Avatar
 
1997 Mustang GT
Faster than an s4
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,598
ModMustang97GT has a spectacular aura aboutModMustang97GT has a spectacular aura aboutModMustang97GT has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

RPM limits of a stock 4.6.


I have a 97 GT, and I am considering getting the Logan Motorsports intake. I want to know, since the intake is good to 7000rpm. What is my engine good to. Will my rotating assembly be able to take that? If not, I expect a good stroker kit would be fine to 7000RPM, despite the bigger stroke. But I just wanted to know if anyone knew what the limit was, I know according to the tach its 6K.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old January 3rd, 2008, 02:24 PM   #2
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
Juggalo_X's Avatar
 
2001 Mustang 232/CBR600
14+@Slow
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 6,688
Juggalo_X will become famous soon enoughJuggalo_X will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Juggalo_X
Default

if its a stock engine with stock internals then its the stock rpm limit. Revs are limited because of vibration in the crank and such at high rpm. exceeding this could cause bottom end damage, or top end damage like a collapsed valve spring ect.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2008, 02:25 PM   #3
MM's Mad Scientist
 
acmillr's Avatar
 
Slow Fella
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,111
acmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

The stock assembly is pretty decent to 6500 and even a little more from my experience. The stroker kit will be worth less RPM's than a stock stroke set up for sure. I wouldn't push a stroked modular much past 6500, but that's just me. On the other hand, a built stock stroke 4.6 will scream over 7000 all day.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2008, 02:34 PM   #4
MM Fanatic
 
mdvaldosta's Avatar
 
2002 Mustang GT
11.47@120.58
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 3,940
mdvaldosta will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

You got cams and heads that'll breath that high? Don't matter what you can rev to, matters where you make power. Stock bottom and top end is good to around 6500 fairly safely, but you won't make power anywhere near that high without heads and cams.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2008, 02:40 PM   #5
MM's Mad Scientist
 
acmillr's Avatar
 
Slow Fella
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,111
acmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

You do have the PI heads, right?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2008, 04:03 PM   #6
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
2007 GT
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,950
07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Can somebody explain to me why these engines cant rev higher? I thought one of the pros of ovc engine was higher revs? I see pushrods reving to 8 thousand on production cars like the vette and cup engines in nascar hitting 9000. Why is the stock rev limiter at 6250? and your saying if i get forged parts it still cant go over 7000?
  Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2008, 04:07 PM   #7
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
Juggalo_X's Avatar
 
2001 Mustang 232/CBR600
14+@Slow
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 6,688
Juggalo_X will become famous soon enoughJuggalo_X will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Juggalo_X
Default

things like a better balanced Crank, lighter and balanced drive shaft, better cams and springs all will allow a higher rev with out the engine vibrating its self to death internally. its all about the vibrations and the tolerances for the installed parts. that and u need valves heads and an intake that will be able to flow at that rpm.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2008, 04:08 PM   #8
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
Juggalo_X's Avatar
 
2001 Mustang 232/CBR600
14+@Slow
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 6,688
Juggalo_X will become famous soon enoughJuggalo_X will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Juggalo_X
Default

forgot to mention a lighter fly wheel. and if they make one for our cars a hydrologic one would be preferable so its always perfectly balanced
  Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2008, 04:25 PM   #9
MM's Mad Scientist
 
acmillr's Avatar
 
Slow Fella
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,111
acmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Nobody said that you can't rev over 7000. I shift mine at about 7300. However, you are shooting yourself in the foot if you are trying to build a stroked motor for high revs.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2008, 04:35 PM   #10
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
2007 GT
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 11,950
07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of07stanggt has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by Juggalo_X View Post
things like a better balanced Crank, lighter and balanced drive shaft, better cams and springs all will allow a higher rev with out the engine vibrating its self to death internally. its all about the vibrations and the tolerances for the installed parts. that and u need valves heads and an intake that will be able to flow at that rpm.
Ok so its a lot to do with other stuff than the engine itself. That makes sense.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2008, 04:36 PM   #11
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
Juggalo_X's Avatar
 
2001 Mustang 232/CBR600
14+@Slow
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: South Western Ontario
Posts: 6,688
Juggalo_X will become famous soon enoughJuggalo_X will become famous soon enough
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to Juggalo_X
Default

Originally Posted by 07stanggt View Post
Ok so its a lot to do with other stuff than the engine itself. That makes sense.
yep
  Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2008, 07:43 PM   #12
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
ModMustang97GT's Avatar
 
1997 Mustang GT
Faster than an s4
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,598
ModMustang97GT has a spectacular aura aboutModMustang97GT has a spectacular aura aboutModMustang97GT has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

The stroker kits are built to a higher standard and forged so they are stronger. The 2 main causes of vibration in the engine are balance and give in the materials. The stock crank is no where near as well made as a stroker kit one, so the materials are not an issue. The only issue then is balance, and an experianced machinist like the ones we use to balance our Hydroplane engines, can balance the crank to turn unreal numbers. At any rate, I know I could crank the Stroker higher, I just wanted to know if when I swapped in my new heads and intake, if I can really tap in to the potential of the intake with the stock crank, rods and pistons. And it sounds like it won't very well.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2008, 09:50 PM   #13
MM's Coffee Addict
 
96Snaker's Avatar
 
1999 SVT Cobra
441rwhp/393rwtq
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,164
96Snaker has a spectacular aura about96Snaker has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 96Snaker
Default

Originally Posted by ModMustang97GT View Post
The stroker kits are built to a higher standard and forged so they are stronger. The 2 main causes of vibration in the engine are balance and give in the materials. The stock crank is no where near as well made as a stroker kit one, so the materials are not an issue. The only issue then is balance, and an experianced machinist like the ones we use to balance our Hydroplane engines, can balance the crank to turn unreal numbers. At any rate, I know I could crank the Stroker higher, I just wanted to know if when I swapped in my new heads and intake, if I can really tap in to the potential of the intake with the stock crank, rods and pistons. And it sounds like it won't very well.
Balance balance balance. And what Joe said - there's no need to rev that high anyway, as your power band will come much sooner than that of 8, 9K I can only assume.

Whoa you work on the SeaFair Hydros? That's pretty cool!! Whereat exactly? If you don't mind. I just noticed you were from Seattle.
__________________

Vortech V2, intercooled @ 10psi. Maximum Motorsports supsension goodie bag car less roll cage. Built '04 IRS. Hodge-podge of Roush/Stalker panels.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 3rd, 2008, 10:03 PM   #14
MM Fanatic
 
Trick Tuners's Avatar
 
KB'd GT
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,467
Trick Tuners is a name known to allTrick Tuners is a name known to allTrick Tuners is a name known to allTrick Tuners is a name known to allTrick Tuners is a name known to allTrick Tuners is a name known to all
iTrader: 3 reviews
Default

As some of the others have said its all about having a proper combo with all the parts matched. Your intent also matters. For example if you want a high revving NA beast for the track or something with a lot of boost for the street. If you get a cam set up for lots of power on the high end it will be a dog on the low end. Intakes are similar due to runner design. If it can flow 700hp and you only have 300 you will be missing out on hp and low end tq because the runners will be too short and wide. Its all about keeping the air velocity high without restricting the flow. (if you oversize you can loose power) More valves also help with revving higher. (4v)
  Reply With Quote
Old January 4th, 2008, 01:47 PM   #15
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
ModMustang97GT's Avatar
 
1997 Mustang GT
Faster than an s4
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,598
ModMustang97GT has a spectacular aura aboutModMustang97GT has a spectacular aura aboutModMustang97GT has a spectacular aura about
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

I live in seattle, I work with both Lealand Racing and Unlimited (the big ones) and Miss Critical Logic which is a UL which I am actually on the crew for. Anyways, I would love to have a car that will make 300-400 hp at the wheels. 400 would be excelent, but I don't want to get a Centri charger. I would like to go turbo or Whipple\KB. The problem is, those are both really expensive. I can grab a good intake and it will save me alot more than buying a SC. Granted I will get 50 -70 more HP than the N/A intake. But with the N/A intake, and a good n/a cam, I can crank it up to around the 350 whp mark. But if my internals are going to crap out about 6500 rpm, its hard to make the N/A work really well.
  Reply With Quote
Old January 5th, 2008, 08:11 AM   #16
Enthusiast
 
johnr2001's Avatar
 
2001 GT
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bivalve MD
Posts: 575
johnr2001 is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

4.6's are known for spinning rod bearings. A stock one will not take 6500 for long with out doing so. unless your changing your intake it stops making power at 5800 anyway.
__________________
03 Mach 1 full eaton swap, 18" chrome bullitts, H&R springs, 5.0 shifter, slp2, mac catted H, FRP 4.10's,
443 RWHP/ 386 TQ
  Reply With Quote
Old January 5th, 2008, 10:42 AM   #17
MM Ninjas!
 
1slo5.0's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 11,375
1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all1slo5.0 is a name known to all
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to 1slo5.0
Default

Originally Posted by ModMustang97GT View Post
I have a 97 GT, and I am considering getting the Logan Motorsports intake. I want to know, since the intake is good to 7000rpm. What is my engine good to. Will my rotating assembly be able to take that? If not, I expect a good stroker kit would be fine to 7000RPM, despite the bigger stroke. But I just wanted to know if anyone knew what the limit was, I know according to the tach its 6K.
RPM means nothing. If your engine isn't making any power at that rpm your car is going to slow way down. Just because the intake is advertised to have a 7000 rpm limit doesn't mean your engine will make power at that rpm or even benefit from the intake.
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm....


***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
  Reply With Quote
Old January 5th, 2008, 12:15 PM   #18
Enthusiast
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 986
StangAddiction is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via Yahoo to StangAddiction
Default

Originally Posted by acmillr View Post
Nobody said that you can't rev over 7000. I shift mine at about 7300. However, you are shooting yourself in the foot if you are trying to build a stroked motor for high revs.
+1...if you want a hi-rev motor go with a big bore setup..
  Reply With Quote
Old January 5th, 2008, 12:41 PM   #19
MM's Mad Scientist
 
acmillr's Avatar
 
Slow Fella
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,111
acmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by StangAddiction View Post
+1...if you want a hi-rev motor go with a big bore setup..
I have been considering a 3.700" bore for my next build. I feel like that would be the way to pick up some much needed cubes.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old January 5th, 2008, 12:42 PM   #20
MM's Mad Scientist
 
acmillr's Avatar
 
Slow Fella
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,111
acmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to beholdacmillr is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: 2 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by johnr2001 View Post
4.6's are known for spinning rod bearings. A stock one will not take 6500 for long with out doing so. unless your changing your intake it stops making power at 5800 anyway.
Actually, the stock intake makes power to about 6700 and starts to fall off.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: RPM limits of a stock 4.6.
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Avatar and Signature size limits increased please? Steam Feedback Forum 9 November 10th, 2007 02:49 AM
tranny hp limits question Plays With Squirrels 96-98 3 August 4th, 2007 04:04 AM
v6 motor limits popmyclutch V6 Mustangs 6 July 7th, 2007 12:41 AM
block/bottem end limits? Orangester V6 Mustangs 2 April 2nd, 2007 12:48 AM
Limits of the 4.6L 24 valve motor OcOnnor220 99-04 11 December 31st, 2006 02:06 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.