![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing 1999 GT Cam Question in the Modular Mustangs Forum. Newbie here needing some help. I ahve been doing some research on my next mod, ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 71
|
1999 GT Cam QuestionI have a 99GT, manual transmission that is not my daily driver. I read where some people say the 4.6 sounds sick when the cams are upgraded. There is a certified mechanic where I live that will do the job for $250 if he needs to change the valve springs, seems pretty cheap to me! Now, what would you guys recommend? I'd like to keep it at around $600 if possible because of other upgrades I am also doing. Is this an upgrade that most people do with their stang? Thanks patrick |
|
|
#2 |
|
Maintenance Man
2002 Mustang GT
11.47@120.58
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 3,945
|
Springs are gonna cost around $150 - $200, plus $550 - $600 for the cams. Cams are awsome, good power gain (if you've got stock heads don't go with the biggest cams) and great sound. A good investment.
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 71
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,909
|
i am using comp cams in mine. im running a stage 2 but wouls reccomend a stage 1 with your heads. theya re around 580 bux and i do reccomend doing the springs also. my comps sound badass but the stage 1s arent gonna have a big lope. youll somewht be able to hear them but not extremely noticible. not a lot of poeple do them becasue they arent simple to do. but its a great upgrade and will wake your car up a little bit
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 71
|
I talked to the guys at VT racing and with my setup they recommended the Stage 2 kit which is a 560 lift. They said that because I want the distinct, agressive sound. If I would go that way, would I have enough clearance over my existing pistons? I wouldn't want to bust off the top of my pistons!
My buddy has a 532 lift on his 5.0 and it lopes pretty good. I know they are totally different engines but the VT Stage 1 has a 540 lift. Geesh, decisions! |
|
|
#6 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,909
|
i think poerformance wise, youd be better off with the stage 1 but if ya want the 2 for the sound, then go for it. youll have to do somehting different with the timing becasue you could get some piston to valve clearence probelms
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 71
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Rockin the Casbah
2004 Mustang GT
12.88 @ 112
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Newport News, VA
Posts: 6,199
|
vt and comp make great cams, I went with the guy in my sig for a custom grind. He asked me everything that had done to the car and what I planned on doing and made them for me for $750 with the springs.
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,379
|
im running comp 262 cams in mine. buddy of mine has vt stage 2 cams. no ptv problems and sounds sick!
__________________
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2.../matrixsig.jpg |
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular
2002 Mustang GT
13.6@102
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 129
|
Since were on the topic of cams, im planning on putting in a turbo, but before that i woudl like to put on a comp cam and patriot stage 1 heads, would this be worth it? NOt sure what you mean by springs.
__________________
Procharged 383 rwhp/ 391 rwtq |
|
|
#11 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,909
|
when we talk about springs were talking about the valve springs. the stock ones arent great fro bigger cams. the headds would do you good, but you should probably look for some turbo specific cams. i know for sure your going to want something has a wide lsa(lobe seperation) around 114-116 as so your not blowing boost out of the exhuast and wasting it.
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 2,034
|
If you go with a stage 1 setup yo wont need a tune and you cankeep your stock springs.Stage 2 you will also need a tune which is costly along with new valve springs.
Depending on how much you wanna fiddle with the tune,stage 1 might be the way to go. Stage 2 will definately sounds deeper,but there are some drawbacks
__________________
Fryrice has left the building. |
|
|
#13 | |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl.
Posts: 44
|
-Ed |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
MM Ninjas!
2000 mustang GT
11.79@125
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: PURCELL, OKLAHOMA
Posts: 8,909
|
you need a tune whether you go with a stage 1 or a stage 2. anytime you change something in your engine, you need to have a tune for 1. to make it safe, and 2 to make it run well and take advantage of everything you can. there arent really any draw backs to the stage 2. you probably wont be able to use the power range with them becasue you shouldnt be revving your stokc shortblock that high. stage 1 on your car would be the way to go. youll be able to hear them a little bit but it wont be like the 2s. i suggest you do the springs no matter what you do. just preventing problems that could arise later on
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 1999 GT Cam Question
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1999 Mustang GT | CyberPrey | Modular Mustangs | 6 | November 6th, 2006 11:29 AM |
| Looking to sell my 1999 GT? | Max02420 | 99-04 | 1 | November 1st, 2006 02:19 PM |
| Set of 8 Coils for 1999 and up GT | John C | For Sale | 3 | October 22nd, 2006 10:09 AM |
| 1999 | mnky 99 gt | 5.0 Mustangs | 0 | June 28th, 2006 09:50 PM |
| 1999 redo | curbut | General Tech | 3 | May 5th, 2006 12:17 PM |