pushrod vs dohc or sohc
Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Insurance


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Modular Mustangs

ModdedMustangs.com is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools
Old May 7th, 2008, 11:15 PM   #1
Admanistrator
 
v606er's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,454
v606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to v606er
Default

pushrod vs dohc or sohc


what is the difference between the push rod(i think the vette zo6 has them) and the dohc/sohc(our cars)
__________________

Originally Posted by BWAL View Post
i liked the chilean miners before they went all mainstream. i liked them back when they were still underground.
MAD Stangs #8
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old May 7th, 2008, 11:55 PM   #2
Priest of the Car Gods
 
ReverendDexter's Avatar
 
Clapped-out '90 GT 'vert
~5.5 seconds off TTOD :(
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 13,808
ReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ReverendDexter
Default

entirely different engine design.

Pushrod has a single cam in the block.

SOHC has a single cam in each of the cylinder heads.

DOHC has two cams in each of the cylinders (one for intake, one for exhaust).
__________________

O o
/¯/______________________
|BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!
\_\
  Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2008, 12:01 AM   #3
Priest of the Car Gods
 
ReverendDexter's Avatar
 
Clapped-out '90 GT 'vert
~5.5 seconds off TTOD :(
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 13,808
ReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ReverendDexter
Default

In terms of performance, pushrod motors are usually torquier, and OHC designs will rev higher and be more hp oriented.

OHC designs are usually more efficient.
__________________

O o
/¯/______________________
|BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!
\_\
  Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2008, 12:01 AM   #4
Admanistrator
 
v606er's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,454
v606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to v606er
Default

Originally Posted by ReverendDexter View Post
entirely different engine design.

Pushrod has a single cam in the block.

SOHC has a single cam in each of the cylinder heads.

DOHC has two cams in each of the cylinders (one for intake, one for exhaust).
o. i assume the pushrod is better cause the z06 is faster... but which one is actually better?

EDIT: ok well that answers my question. i guess we posted at the same time
__________________

Originally Posted by BWAL View Post
i liked the chilean miners before they went all mainstream. i liked them back when they were still underground.
MAD Stangs #8
  Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2008, 12:36 AM   #5
Priest of the Car Gods
 
ReverendDexter's Avatar
 
Clapped-out '90 GT 'vert
~5.5 seconds off TTOD :(
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 13,808
ReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ReverendDexter
Default

Chassis aside, the Z06 is fast for two reasons:
1) The LS-series are the most efficient pushrod motors ever made.
2) The LS7 is 7 liters... as in 427 cubic inches.
__________________

O o
/¯/______________________
|BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!
\_\
  Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2008, 12:57 AM   #6
Enthusiast
 
1998 Mustang GT
Need to hit the track
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Katy, TX
Posts: 856
RandoGT is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by ReverendDexter View Post
Chassis aside, the Z06 is fast for two reasons:
1) The LS-series are the most efficient pushrod motors ever made.
2) The LS7 is 7 liters... as in 427 cubic inches.
with that said, (hypothetically speaking of course) if Ford was to take their 4.6 and say "hey, let's make it a 7 liter", use the same technology as the LS7, same grind cam, head ports alike, everything...which one would make more power?

2nd option. if the 4.6 was to be upped to a 5.7 (to match the LS1), leaving it as is, how would they match up powerwise?
  Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2008, 09:43 AM   #7
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
 
Eagle2000GT's Avatar
 
2000 Mustang GT
12.73@111.36
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 5,316
Eagle2000GT is a splendid one to beholdEagle2000GT is a splendid one to beholdEagle2000GT is a splendid one to beholdEagle2000GT is a splendid one to beholdEagle2000GT is a splendid one to beholdEagle2000GT is a splendid one to beholdEagle2000GT is a splendid one to behold
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

Originally Posted by RandoGT View Post
with that said, (hypothetically speaking of course) if Ford was to take their 4.6 and say "hey, let's make it a 7 liter", use the same technology as the LS7, same grind cam, head ports alike, everything...which one would make more power?

2nd option. if the 4.6 was to be upped to a 5.7 (to match the LS1), leaving it as is, how would they match up powerwise?
Ford already has (had?) a 7 liter pushrod engine. It was the 428 Cobra Jet and they used to put them in Mustangs. They changed to the modular motor for a more efficient manufacturing process.

If you want a 5.8 modular motor, MMR has the block for you. Scroll down about half way.

Modular Mustang Racing
__________________
ProCharger P-1SC, 9 psi, STD 396/383; Uncorrected 388/375; SAE 383/370
Mods list in Garage.
  Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2008, 11:55 PM   #8
MM Fanatic
 
qwik48r's Avatar
 
alotta shit
no fat girls fast
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: in the woods
Posts: 3,681
qwik48r is a jewel in the roughqwik48r is a jewel in the roughqwik48r is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to qwik48r
Default

Originally Posted by ReverendDexter View Post
In terms of performance, pushrod motors are usually torquier, and OHC designs will rev higher and be more hp oriented.

OHC designs are usually more efficient.
just FYI... ALL GM trucks and SUV's between 1999 and NOW all have LS series engines. i have a 4.8 in my truck which see's 7000+ rpm every weekend... stock motor, just upgraded vlaves springs... 20 minute chore.
in all fairness, if built correctly (actually balanced... or at least halfway...)most any OHV V8 motor will spin just as well as any OHC V8 motor.

i like to think about like this: every GM vehicle with 5.3 to a 6.0 ls v8...
all you need is a cam/spring swap, good exhaust (as in NO manifolds or shitties) and tune and 100 extra hp can be had.... out of any LS... with any miles... 6 bolt mains, cathedral cylinder heads, stock internals can withstand upwards of 700 hp and 20+# of boost.................................... hows that for some chevy knowledge...
__________________
mind your business what i drive... i'm on a fucking mustang forum.
qwik's build
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2008, 12:01 AM   #9
MM Fanatic
 
qwik48r's Avatar
 
alotta shit
no fat girls fast
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: in the woods
Posts: 3,681
qwik48r is a jewel in the roughqwik48r is a jewel in the roughqwik48r is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to qwik48r
Default

Originally Posted by Eagle2000GT View Post
Ford already has (had?) a 7 liter pushrod engine. It was the 428 Cobra Jet and they used to put them in Mustangs. They changed to the modular motor for a more efficient manufacturing process.

If you want a 5.8 modular motor, MMR has the block for you. Scroll down about half way.

Modular Mustang Racing
and ford actually had a 427... called it a side oiler. put it in the cobra... actually ford came out with the 427 first... a original 427 Sideoiler block is worth about 5 grand now in good condition... have a buddy thats got an original sitting in his shop right now... its got a busted main bearing valley... once he gets that welded... its going in a factory five for some lucky bastard....
__________________
mind your business what i drive... i'm on a fucking mustang forum.
qwik's build
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2008, 12:10 AM   #10
Admanistrator
 
v606er's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,454
v606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to v606er
Default

Originally Posted by qwik48r View Post
and ford actually had a 427... called it a side oiler. put it in the cobra... actually ford came out with the 427 first... a original 427 Sideoiler block is worth about 5 grand now in good condition... have a buddy thats got an original sitting in his shop right now... its got a busted main bearing valley... once he gets that welded... its going in a factory five for some lucky bastard....
they are selling roush 427s where i am
__________________

Originally Posted by BWAL View Post
i liked the chilean miners before they went all mainstream. i liked them back when they were still underground.
MAD Stangs #8
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2008, 12:18 AM   #11
MM Fanatic
 
qwik48r's Avatar
 
alotta shit
no fat girls fast
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: in the woods
Posts: 3,681
qwik48r is a jewel in the roughqwik48r is a jewel in the roughqwik48r is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to qwik48r
Default

yea they arent 427 CUI motors.. just 427 hp..

i m talking about the 427 s.o made in the 60's (started in 64' with the cobra.. after the 289 lol)... then chevy decided to make a 427 and put it in the vette
__________________
mind your business what i drive... i'm on a fucking mustang forum.
qwik's build
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2008, 12:31 AM   #12
Priest of the Car Gods
 
ReverendDexter's Avatar
 
Clapped-out '90 GT 'vert
~5.5 seconds off TTOD :(
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 13,808
ReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ReverendDexter
Default

Originally Posted by v606er View Post
they are selling roush 427s where i am
Yeah, those aren't named for their displacement.

Ford also had a SOHC 427 or 428 (I forget which) back in the 60s that was going to be used as a NASCAR motor.

If you were to take a current 3v 4.6L and scale it up to a 7.0L, assuming no efficiency gained or lost, it would make ~466 hp. Scaled up to a 5.7L it would make ~372 hp.

OHC designs are more optimal for rpm due to the reduced oscillating mass. You're not fighting the extra intertia of the pushrods & lifters to actuate your valves. I've also yet to see an OHV motor with more than 2 valves per cylinder (if my memory serves, 5v motors are mathematically the most efficient design you can have - which is why Ferraris use 5v motors, as did the top-end Toyota 4A-GE).

If you think that a OHV motor can rev, compare the most advanced pushrod motors in the world (NASCAR engines) with the most advanced OHC engines (Formula 1). Nascar motors turn 10-11k rpm (if I recall correctly, please correct me if this is wrong). F1 motors turn 17-19k.

OHV motors do have their advantages, too. Their compact heads allow a much larger displacement motor to occupy the same amount of space: a DOHC 4.6L is the same size externally as a 429 or 460. This means you can have a LOT more torque in a smaller package, and keep the rpms down (which in turn leads to motor longevity).
__________________

O o
/¯/______________________
|BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!
\_\
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2008, 12:35 AM   #13
Admanistrator
 
v606er's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,454
v606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to v606er
Default

i heard about that engine ford made that was supposed to be for nascar, but it was too good or something
__________________

Originally Posted by BWAL View Post
i liked the chilean miners before they went all mainstream. i liked them back when they were still underground.
MAD Stangs #8
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2008, 12:38 AM   #14
Admanistrator
 
v606er's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,454
v606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to v606er
Default

why the push rod if ohc's are better(thats what i got out of your last post), then why is there the pushrod?
__________________

Originally Posted by BWAL View Post
i liked the chilean miners before they went all mainstream. i liked them back when they were still underground.
MAD Stangs #8
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2008, 12:43 AM   #15
N/A 4v Guru
 
Doc8224's Avatar
 
2003 Mach 1
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 3,463
Blog Entries: 2
Doc8224 is a jewel in the roughDoc8224 is a jewel in the roughDoc8224 is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

The OHC heads aren't that compact. A 4v 4.6 is alot wider than a big block. If you compare a cobra motor next to a LS-7 the ls motor will look like a baby and it is mostly the heads. As for power to size. a 5.0 cammer (dohc 5.0 modular from FRPP) is over 400hp and thats with about 302ci. The power in the OHC motors is in the heads. The 2v's can make torque to compare with a pushrod motor but the 4v's make the HP but need to rev high to do it. GM has a great motor in the LS and the mod motor is a love or hate thing. There is alot of power to be had in them but the cost can be high. You can make 450whp with a 4v with alot less cubes than the LS has.
__________________

Military Crew
U.S. Army Aviation
Apache's Lead The Way
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2008, 12:45 AM   #16
Admanistrator
 
v606er's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 11,454
v606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud ofv606er has much to be proud of
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to v606er
Default

i am really confused. what do the 2v or 4v mean? is that v6 and v8?
__________________

Originally Posted by BWAL View Post
i liked the chilean miners before they went all mainstream. i liked them back when they were still underground.
MAD Stangs #8
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2008, 12:48 AM   #17
N/A 4v Guru
 
Doc8224's Avatar
 
2003 Mach 1
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 3,463
Blog Entries: 2
Doc8224 is a jewel in the roughDoc8224 is a jewel in the roughDoc8224 is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

2v head or 4v head.
__________________

Military Crew
U.S. Army Aviation
Apache's Lead The Way
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2008, 12:51 AM   #18
N/A 4v Guru
 
Doc8224's Avatar
 
2003 Mach 1
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Afghanistan
Posts: 3,463
Blog Entries: 2
Doc8224 is a jewel in the roughDoc8224 is a jewel in the roughDoc8224 is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Default

4v head. Like on the cobra and Mach motors. 4 valves per cylinder


2v head like on the Mustang GT's. 2 valves per cylinder
__________________

Military Crew
U.S. Army Aviation
Apache's Lead The Way
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2008, 12:57 AM   #19
MM Fanatic
 
qwik48r's Avatar
 
alotta shit
no fat girls fast
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: in the woods
Posts: 3,681
qwik48r is a jewel in the roughqwik48r is a jewel in the roughqwik48r is a jewel in the rough
iTrader: 1 reviews
Send a message via AIM to qwik48r
Default

Originally Posted by ReverendDexter View Post
Yeah, those aren't named for their displacement.

Ford also had a SOHC 427 or 428 (I forget which) back in the 60s that was going to be used as a NASCAR motor.

If you were to take a current 3v 4.6L and scale it up to a 7.0L, assuming no efficiency gained or lost, it would make ~466 hp. Scaled up to a 5.7L it would make ~372 hp.

OHC designs are more optimal for rpm due to the reduced oscillating mass. You're not fighting the extra intertia of the pushrods & lifters to actuate your valves. I've also yet to see an OHV motor with more than 2 valves per cylinder (if my memory serves, 5v motors are mathematically the most efficient design you can have - which is why Ferraris use 5v motors, as did the top-end Toyota 4A-GE).

If you think that a OHV motor can rev, compare the most advanced pushrod motors in the world (NASCAR engines) with the most advanced OHC engines (Formula 1). Nascar motors turn 10-11k rpm (if I recall correctly, please correct me if this is wrong). F1 motors turn 17-19k.

OHV motors do have their advantages, too. Their compact heads allow a much larger displacement motor to occupy the same amount of space: a DOHC 4.6L is the same size externally as a 429 or 460. This means you can have a LOT more torque in a smaller package, and keep the rpms down (which in turn leads to motor longevity).




its funny NASCAR small block makes about the same power as an F1 motor at half the rpms.... OHV's make there magic, in their heads


that was the 427 cammer your talking about


the less inertial mass is why they make more power up high... again OHV makes power in the head and chamber design correlating perfectly with the cam profile. OHC with less inertial mass, is ACTUALLY able to twist to 19K+, taking advantage of a different type of cam profile.. OHC motor generally can accomodate a more aggresive grind while still being tame...

we have a 383 here in the shop... actaully used to be a 2 bolt main we retrofitted after it flung a slug... got a set of Racer Pro's from Australia (cheap good head) and a monster bumpstick... we dual step it.. 5000 and th400 redline is set at around 10,000rpms
__________________
mind your business what i drive... i'm on a fucking mustang forum.
qwik's build

Last edited by qwik48r; May 9th, 2008 at 01:00 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old May 9th, 2008, 01:10 AM   #20
Priest of the Car Gods
 
ReverendDexter's Avatar
 
Clapped-out '90 GT 'vert
~5.5 seconds off TTOD :(
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rohnert Park, CA
Posts: 13,808
ReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond reputeReverendDexter has a reputation beyond repute
iTrader: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to ReverendDexter
Default

Originally Posted by v606er View Post
why the push rod if ohc's are better(thats what i got out of your last post), then why is there the pushrod?
Pushrods are an earlier design, easier to work on, cheaper to modify. And pushrods are pretty rare anymore when you look at cars on a global scale. American companies are the only ones that still sell a pushrod motor, and even then it's only GM and Chrysler.

If you give Joe America the choice between a 427 and a Turbo 3.8L, he'll take the 427 almost every time, even if the Turbo 3.8L makes more torque, more hp, and gets double the fuel economy.
__________________

O o
/¯/______________________
|BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!
\_\
  Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Thread Tools


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/modular-mustangs/69995-pushrod-vs-dohc-sohc.html
Posted By For Type Date
4 cam modular in gen 1 - Page 3 - The National Lightning Owners Club Inc This thread Refback January 1st, 2011 01:57 AM

Threads Similar to: pushrod vs dohc or sohc
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sohc to dohc usmc513 96-98 3 October 30th, 2007 04:59 PM
sohc to a dohc? gtdan 96-98 11 September 6th, 2007 01:53 AM
SOHC to DOHC energiesource 99-04 9 May 16th, 2007 10:06 AM
SOHC to DOHC NMR-2vGT 96-98 6 March 13th, 2007 10:51 AM
SOHC 4.6 to DOHC 4.6 rattlesnake28977 Modular Mustangs 8 December 6th, 2006 02:16 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.

powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd.