| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
how is that contradicting himself. the 2v is cheaper, but the 4v will make more power mod for mod. its breathes better therefor its gonna make more power. the 4v will always make more and be easier to make more than the 2v
__________________
RIP ![]() ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. One Big Ass Mistake America SHEEPDOGS |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
|
theres a lot of somewhat wrong info in this thread. a 400 rwhp 4v is plenty streetable if set up right.
if a 2v and a 4v are both running 9 psi out of the same blower, the 4v is going to make more power hands down. boost is just a pressure reading. the 4v is simply taking in mroe air, even at the same boost levels. the blocks on these cars are all the same. except for the difference of iron vs aluminum. both blocks are gonna ahndle more than you are ever going to throw at them. if your power goal is only 400, then 2v is the way to go, itll be cheaper in the long run, but if your wanting 500 plus, 4v is the way to go hands down. the b heads are the worst 4v heads out there flow wise.
__________________
RIP ![]() ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. One Big Ass Mistake America SHEEPDOGS |
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Priest of the Car Gods
|
I totally agree. However, when I said that a 400hp 4v wasn't going to be streetable, I was referring to a bolt-on only N/A car, and I would love to see an example that proves this wrong, as it will give me some ideas as to mods I can do to my car!
Do you have empiricial data to back this up? It's been my understanding that the problem with b-port heads is that they flow TOO well for a 300hp motor, which is why they have the IRMC plates that restrict flow at low rpm. I thought the big advantage to the C port was that they restricted the flow somewhat, which increased the port velocity at low rpm, giving them considerably more V8-appropriate low-end torque.
__________________
O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 461
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
yeah, hes not coming off right about B heads, the b heads are the worst flowing stock, however they are about the best flowing ported, and almost equal flowing with imrc plates removed
__________________
Considering selling my car to fund my race car: take a look and tell me what you think. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post1041280 |
|
|
|
#25 |
|
MM Fanatic
KB'd GT
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
If your goals are 400+ NA power then go with the 4 valve for sure. (and bump up the compression!!!)
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Priest of the Car Gods
|
What exactly would you have to do to a stock 4v 4.6L to get 400hp N/A? My understanding is that anything past the low 300s at the tires is going to require some sort of unnatural aspiration, so, at high drivetrain loss, we're still only talking 365hp or so at the crank.
__________________
O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ |
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Genibus Nitito Canus
|
full bolt ons, p&p, cams, if 300 can be achieved with a sohc, n/a, then 400 can be achieved in a dohc, n/a. if you wait a little while and Doc will have the exact answer on how to do it
__________________
Red 1996 GT: JLT RAI, Steeda Underdrive pullies, Stewart Waterpump; nothing to brag about Black 2009 45th aniverary edition GT 5 speed: K&N CAI, BBK Twin 62mm Throttle Body, BBK Underdrive Pullies, SLP Loudmouth ![]() |
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Priest of the Car Gods
|
Yeah, I'm waiting for someone that has done it and dyno'd it. These cars do respond well to mods, but there's not as much you can do to a DOHC without resorting to FI or nitrous.
__________________
O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ |
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Genibus Nitito Canus
|
well just wait till Doc gets done with his build
__________________
Red 1996 GT: JLT RAI, Steeda Underdrive pullies, Stewart Waterpump; nothing to brag about Black 2009 45th aniverary edition GT 5 speed: K&N CAI, BBK Twin 62mm Throttle Body, BBK Underdrive Pullies, SLP Loudmouth ![]() |
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 397
![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
B-heads actually flow very well. Better that c (99-01) heads. Its just that with all that volume (twin ports) the air speed (aka velocity) is low. Combined with the injector only spraying into the primary port the air in the secondary port only gets to atomize with the fuel/air of the primary port in the chamber. By that time its too late. The fastest mod motor on the planet runs b-heads. You gonna tell him there are better flowing heads?
__________________
![]() -Mark- 98' N/A Cobra (Stock longblock) 11.79 at 114.64 (1.62 60ft) |
|
|
|
#31 | |
|
MM Fanatic
KB'd GT
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 4,467
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 3 reviews
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: SOHC or DOHC? (Not Your Typical Question)
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| sohc to dohc | usmc513 | 96-98 | 3 | October 30th, 2007 04:59 PM |
| sohc to a dohc? | gtdan | 96-98 | 11 | September 6th, 2007 01:53 AM |
| SOHC to DOHC | energiesource | 99-04 | 9 | May 16th, 2007 10:06 AM |
| SOHC to DOHC | NMR-2vGT | 96-98 | 6 | March 13th, 2007 10:51 AM |
| 99 GT SOHC to DOHC | MikeyS281 | 99-04 | 4 | September 28th, 2006 12:44 PM |