| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Enthusiast
|
SOHC or DOHC? (Not Your Typical Question)
I was wondering, and what power goal is it worth the switch? To make things easier, lets say I had the choice of buying a SOHC Mustang and a DOHC Mustang (not a Termie, but lets just assume they made one, so it's not forged.) Obviously the DOHC would cost more. If I was aiming for 400 RWHP, the 2 valve would be the better bang-for-buck choice. At which power goal would the DOHC be worth it? Also, which is more expensive to mod? Lastly, up to which HP would which one be cheaper? By that I mean, lets say I spent $10,000 on the SOHC Mustang and $12,000 on the DOHC Mustang. Which would be cheaper to get to 400 RWHP, 500 RWHP, etc. So to sum it all up;
1) At which power goal would the DOHC start to shine? 2) Which would be cheaper to get to 400 RWHP? 500 RWHP? 600 RWHP? Thanks!
__________________
![]() Current mods:
MM Bullitt Crew Founder and Member #1
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Admanistrator
|
im not sure. reverend seems to know a lot about this sortta thing though
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Hammer
Millenium Falcon
"Lived the Dream, Created the Reality, Basking in my Awesomeness"
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zip's Bubble
Posts: 13,030
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
my head hurts from reading all that.
it's cheaper to mod a 2v then it is a 4v you can make more power easier with a 4v then u can with a 2v. u won't make 500rwhp on motor with any of these motors, u need FI, and a built block. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Enthusiast
|
First you say it's cheaper to mod a 2 valve, but then you kind of contradict yourself saying it's easier to mod a 4 valve? Also, I know you need F/I, but at which point would the 4 valve be worth it?
__________________
![]() Current mods:
MM Bullitt Crew Founder and Member #1
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Priest of the Car Gods
|
It's not going to matter. The 4v is going to respond better to modifications. BUT the available mods are fewer, and more expensive. Yes, the heads flow better. A lot better. But under boost, that's not going to matter as much as your bottom end will. In which case the early 4v block is better, but you're going to have to replace the internals anyway. The difference really shines under light mods, not heavy mods. Heavy mods can turn the most dogly of motors into a beast. I know that doesn't answer your question, but I'm not sure that there really is one.
__________________
O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Enthusiast
|
Well if you were to get a blower, would there be a huge difference at like 9 PSI? What about more? Thanks for all your help
.
__________________
![]() Current mods:
MM Bullitt Crew Founder and Member #1
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
The Hammer
Millenium Falcon
"Lived the Dream, Created the Reality, Basking in my Awesomeness"
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zip's Bubble
Posts: 13,030
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
|
||
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Enthusiast
|
Yeah he did. It's easier to make power with light bolt-ons with a 4 valve, but it's gonna cost you more.
__________________
![]() Current mods:
MM Bullitt Crew Founder and Member #1
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Hammer
Millenium Falcon
"Lived the Dream, Created the Reality, Basking in my Awesomeness"
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zip's Bubble
Posts: 13,030
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
exactly.......
When u buy a Cobra, ur buying an all around better machine. But you pay for it. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Enthusiast
|
I'm just curious to see if the 4 valve really justifies itself in cost if you're only aiming for like 400 RWHP, that's my main goal lol.
__________________
![]() Current mods:
MM Bullitt Crew Founder and Member #1
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
The Hammer
Millenium Falcon
"Lived the Dream, Created the Reality, Basking in my Awesomeness"
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zip's Bubble
Posts: 13,030
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
it's gonna cost about the same to get either car up that high. Only dif is u can do it with just bolt on's with the 4v and u need a FI with the 2v. |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Enthusiast
|
A 400 RWHP bolt-on 4 valve, didn't know it was possible.
__________________
![]() Current mods:
MM Bullitt Crew Founder and Member #1
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
The Hammer
Millenium Falcon
"Lived the Dream, Created the Reality, Basking in my Awesomeness"
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Zip's Bubble
Posts: 13,030
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
when i say bolt on, i mean FULL Exhaust, Pulleys, Intake, Cams, tune, new ignition system
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Enthusiast
|
Oh okay, makes sense.
__________________
![]() Current mods:
MM Bullitt Crew Founder and Member #1
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 5
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I can vouch for that. I was running a stock 02 GT w/ P1SC 8lbs boost (and Magnaflow mufflers). I would run with a termi until half through third gear, then his top end would take it.
Modding a 2v is deff cheaper. |
|
|
|
#16 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
2000 Mustang GT
12.73@111.36
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, IN
Posts: 5,316
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
They do make 4v non-forged motors. Mach 1s and 99, 01 Cobras. First, 4v motors breathe better than 2v motors; therefore, bolt-on give you a better horsepower gain. Second, I have heard of high 3xx rwhp with a n/a 4v. Third, neither motor will make 400 rwhp without FI. Fourth, the rods are still the limiting factor unless you have a terminator.
Stock 4v > Stock 2v FI 2v > Stock 4v FI 2v = FI 4v FI forged 2v > FI 4v FI Forged 4v > FI Forged 2v The least expensive way to 400 rwhp is a GT with FI. If you intend to go further than that buy a terminator.
__________________
ProCharger P-1SC, 9 psi, STD 396/383; Uncorrected 388/375; SAE 383/370 Mods list in Garage. |
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Priest of the Car Gods
|
I'd also like to ad that a 400 hp N/A 4v is most likely NOT going to be streetable due to the cams you'd have to be running. If my goal was 400rwhp with my car, I'd do it with a few bolt-ons and a 100-shot of nitrous. If it was 450 or more, I'd get boosty.
If someone has a counterexample to this, I'd love to see it. Another thing I was thinking about was the upper limits. I believe that it's possible to build a 1,000hp 4v without having to port the heads (B-port heads, at least). I don't think you can say the same with a 2v. With the b-port engine, you could also keep your stock block at that power level. And that's not even bringing a Terminator motor into play. My personal opinion is that if you're going to do heavy mods, your best bet is to start with either a Terminator or a B-port motor. Those will give you the strongest blocks and the best flowing heads to work with. If you're shooting for bolt-ons or light boost, work with what you have already. Sorry if that's reiterating what's already said.
__________________
O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Enthusiast
|
My goal for now is 400 RWHP. If I ever decide for more, I'll probably either put more into my current motor until it blows to give me a reason to get a built MMR shortblock OR just buy an MMR shortblock from the start, which will then bump up my new goal to who knows how much! 666 HP or RWHP sounds nice
.
__________________
![]() Current mods:
MM Bullitt Crew Founder and Member #1
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 461
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I love all these buy a termie posts... such a waste, crap blower, alot of crap parts, decent internals - but weaker than aftermarket - oh and its alot more expensive base car to start with. The 4v is best flowing head, 3v almost match them and are alot more simple - simple = reliable. 2v is the most reliable mod motor by far, all can make what ever power you want, better flowing heads just make it easier, cost between them all is really not much different - your talkin a 1500-2500 dollar difference, nothing in the long run. That said, I went with a 5.4 4v for my project, but it all depends on your goals, a 2v can make for a faster street car then you would want to ride in, so dont get too caught up in the 15 yr old cobra worship... most of it is straight BS. Suspension is big, a 450 rwhp with a good suspension with toast a run of the KB termie with 550-650 rwhp (which most are liars and dont make that kind of power anyway, just my .02)
SO to answer your question, with forged internals and stage 3 heads (2v) and FI you be as fast as you want to go, the truth is that 4v heads and ported 2v heads are about the same cost give or take, the 4v is better, the 2v is easier and cheaper and more reliable. Long story short, get a turbo... and if you need more run some juice - 2v vs. 4v is over rated, but dont be mistaken it is important, you need to pick a tranny, gear, power adder etc, that keeps you in your powerband for as long as possible and suspension that can take it.
__________________
Considering selling my car to fund my race car: take a look and tell me what you think. http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post1041280 |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Genibus Nitito Canus
|
i decided along time ago that it would be cheaper for me to get what i wanted out of a 2v than a 4v
__________________
Red 1996 GT: JLT RAI, Steeda Underdrive pullies, Stewart Waterpump; nothing to brag about Black 2009 45th aniverary edition GT 5 speed: K&N CAI, BBK Twin 62mm Throttle Body, BBK Underdrive Pullies, SLP Loudmouth ![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: SOHC or DOHC? (Not Your Typical Question)
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| sohc to dohc | usmc513 | 96-98 | 3 | October 30th, 2007 04:59 PM |
| sohc to a dohc? | gtdan | 96-98 | 11 | September 6th, 2007 01:53 AM |
| SOHC to DOHC | energiesource | 99-04 | 9 | May 16th, 2007 10:06 AM |
| SOHC to DOHC | NMR-2vGT | 96-98 | 6 | March 13th, 2007 10:51 AM |
| 99 GT SOHC to DOHC | MikeyS281 | 99-04 | 4 | September 28th, 2006 12:44 PM |