Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Timeslips Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Modular Mustangs

Discussing The Official Suspension Guide in the Modular Mustangs Forum. so whats the difference between a watts link and a panhard bar?...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old January 8th, 2009, 04:44 AM   #81
Genibus Nitito Canus
 
HBK_2007's Avatar
 
1996 Mustang GT
next year
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,158
Default

so whats the difference between a watts link and a panhard bar?
__________________
Red 1996 GT: JLT RAI, Steeda Underdrive pullies, Stewart Waterpump; nothing to brag about
Black 2009 45th aniverary edition GT 5 speed: K&N CAI, BBK Twin 62mm Throttle Body, BBK Underdrive Pullies, some type of exhaust, "leveling kit"
 

Sponsored Links Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement
Old January 8th, 2009, 05:52 AM   #82
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
2003 gt
not so soon@probably not enough
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 1,742
Default

Watts link hold the axle dead center through a couple arms linked together. A panhard bar controls the side to side movement of the axle by using one long arm that connects the axle to the car so it is forced along an arc as the axle moves up/down. The side to side movement from the arc motion makes the car favor one side over the other. The watts link is better, but the panhard bar is just simpler, cheaper, lighter, and im sure at the end of the day there is only a minor difference between the two if both are setup right.

Watts link


Panhard bar
__________________
want boost? im selling my stuff, from ported plenum/tb to injectors, head unit, maf, power pipe etc... pm me

Last edited by DickH : January 8th, 2009 at 08:03 AM.
 
Old January 8th, 2009, 10:39 AM   #83
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Jazzer The Cat's Avatar
 
2002 s281
19.34@42.259
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Marin County
Posts: 1,318
Default

Originally Posted by ReverendDexter View Post
You mean UCAs, right Jazzer?

I've never seen anyone, ever, complain about poly bushings in the LCAs, whereas I've seen countless warnings against it in the UCAs.

I mean, yes, if ride qualtiy is of the utmost importance, rubber bushings are where it's at, but certainly polys in the UCAs is *much* worse than polys in the LCAs.
I was referring to the LCA's, as I don't know how serious HBK is about a softer ride. To me, this was a no-brainer and purchased spherical/poly LCA's for my ride on a nearly solid arm. I sometimes have to pull myself back and ask if the OP, or in this case, HBK, is as serious as we are on the subject. Seems to me it might be pretty easy to steer a suspension-mod newbie into something he/she may regret when there are several of us all saying pretty much the same thing.

I would guess that most of us learned the hard/expensive way on suspension mods. The knowledge I gained was good, but the result, at times, was NOT an improvement in my situation. I never really go into detail about "upgrades" (and I use that term loosely, as several mods were NOT upgrades) When someone said "Get these double-action, liquid-mercury, titanium, quad-reflex steel-rod shocks", I was like "OK". I realize that we have the best interest in helping others to improve his/her corner-carving endevours and the internet has some WONDERFUL resources. This site being one of many that has good info, but can easily "push" someone into a direction that may not desired. I realize that we are trying to save some of these "bad" steps for the OP/HBK, but just want these people to realize ALL that will result from a particular modification.

Back to your question, Rev. Something I don't know is how much/bad the binding would be with tubular LCA's with poly/poly bushings. I am certain it would bind up, and think it would not be as detremental as same type of UCA's. I would figure that the bushings being so far outward on axle, the poly's would be more apt to give than the UCA's. Not only b/c of the length of the arm itself, but compared to the poor angle of the UCA's.

My hope is that if ANYONE reads all these posts, he/she can make an informed decision and have no regrets

JTC
__________________
'02 GR-40/SLA s281 #0014

HD video from Jazzer The Ego

Choosing a new tire

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Old January 8th, 2009, 01:14 PM   #84
Genibus Nitito Canus
 
HBK_2007's Avatar
 
1996 Mustang GT
next year
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,158
Default

well like ive stated, i currently live on a rough ass road so right now if i can modd the suspension that would help with that AND improve handling, im all for it. I wont be going as far as you guys till i move to boulder (with paved streets)
__________________
Red 1996 GT: JLT RAI, Steeda Underdrive pullies, Stewart Waterpump; nothing to brag about
Black 2009 45th aniverary edition GT 5 speed: K&N CAI, BBK Twin 62mm Throttle Body, BBK Underdrive Pullies, some type of exhaust, "leveling kit"
 
Old January 8th, 2009, 02:09 PM   #85
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 93
Default

no its not a heavy foot, the reason is 15 by 10 weld pro stars on used (out of round) and not balanced goodyear eagle gt2's on 15 by 3.5 weld on skinnies (new and balanced) front. before when i had the stalkers i had no problems. people where all saying that i should of gone with the 4.5 or 5 in front but i like the look of these better and want to work around it. i bought the eagle gt 2's cheap on ebay, new would cost 3 times as much , u get what u pay for and u buy what u can afford.
 
Old January 8th, 2009, 05:48 PM   #86
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
ModMustang97GT's Avatar
 
1997 Mustang GT
Faster than an s4
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,315
Default

Ok, if you want to keep a smooth ride you do not want to get the poly bushings. They are much stiffer. And as far as getting them on your LCA's, I would personally say its worth it. They will be stiffer and rougher, but I don't know how long you spend on that gravel road of yours. I can tell you that with my Race springs and Bilstein HD's, its actually smoother on the really tiny quick bumps, but murder on the big ones. The reason is my wheel rate is much better.

OK important definition here. Your WHEEL RATE
The force it takes for your tire to move up and down. This means how quickly your tire will move into the bumps on the road. You calculate it by the spring rate multiplied by the leverage. In the case of your stock front suspension. Your spring is roughly 1/3 - 1/4 of the way from the pivot point to the wheel. This means you have a 1/3 to 1/4 mechanical advantage on your wheel. So, with my 800 lbs/in springs, I have a wheel rate closer to 200-250 lbs/in. And my force on the bottom of my car is closer to 2/3 - 3/4 advantage. Meaning I feel 3/4 of the bump, and have 1/4 the wheel reaction time it could.

This is the main reason coil overs are so much lower in spring rate. A 300 lbs spring will get 90% of its force on the tire. And the same amount on the car. meaning you will feel roughly half the force on the car and gain 50% more force on the wheel. This leads to better handling and more comfortable ride. Its a pretty simple no brainer.

The problem of course is the cost. You look at the cost of coil overs and think, damn I can't swing that. But let me break it down. Your CC plates are necessary any way, they add strength and adjustability that you need. You won't be buying any sway bars, because they will hurt your handling with the coil overs. You will want to buy new shocks/struts anyways, to match with your new fancy springs. So if you lay it all out.

Spring Setup

$200 - CC plates
$270 - Sway Bars
$550 - Shocks/Struts
$240 - Springs

$1260 - TOTAL

Coil Over Setup
$200 - CC plates
No Sway Bars
$550 Shocks/Struts
$360 Coil Overs - Front
$450 Coil Overs - Rear
$1600 - TOTAL (their package)

Thats $400 more, and you will never upgrade it again. Plus you will have better handling, smoother ride and adjustable ride height.
__________________
Aztec Gold 97GT.
MM CC Plates, Panhard Bar, SFC's & Tower Brace
Eibach Sway Bars
H&R Race Springs/Bilstein Shocks
MAC CAI, LT's, Catted H and Pro-Dumps
KB Boost-a-Spark
PI Swap
Spun Main Bearing...
Author of The Official Suspension Guide
 
Old January 8th, 2009, 05:53 PM   #87
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
ModMustang97GT's Avatar
 
1997 Mustang GT
Faster than an s4
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,315
Default

I know these are expensive options. And the coil overs are kind of an all at once expense. So its hard to justify. If you do the springs and shocks route. You will still have a corner carving monster, but will not be as comfortable and it won't be adjustable. I recommend the coil overs, But there is nothing wrong with getting a street set up that will dominate most non super cars on the road. Get a 4 point harness. Gets some fatty meats. Put on the chassis stiffening package. Get a PHB, new sway bar, springs and shocks. And your car will hang corners with more speed than YOU will be ready for. If you want to step it up. There are lots of mods you can add before you have to tackle the Coil-Over question. Problem is, turning fast is just as addictive as accelerating fast. Drift an On-Ramp at 80 and you'll know what I mean. Tell me what you want, I'll tell you what you need.
__________________
Aztec Gold 97GT.
MM CC Plates, Panhard Bar, SFC's & Tower Brace
Eibach Sway Bars
H&R Race Springs/Bilstein Shocks
MAC CAI, LT's, Catted H and Pro-Dumps
KB Boost-a-Spark
PI Swap
Spun Main Bearing...
Author of The Official Suspension Guide
 
Old January 8th, 2009, 06:01 PM   #88
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
ModMustang97GT's Avatar
 
1997 Mustang GT
Faster than an s4
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,315
Default

Originally Posted by DickH View Post
Watts link hold the axle dead center through a couple arms linked together. A panhard bar controls the side to side movement of the axle by using one long arm that connects the axle to the car so it is forced along an arc as the axle moves up/down. The side to side movement from the arc motion makes the car favor one side over the other. The watts link is better, but the panhard bar is just simpler, cheaper, lighter, and im sure at the end of the day there is only a minor difference between the two if both are setup right.

Watts link


Panhard bar
What kind of car's are those? Thats not a mustang suspension, atleast not 96-04.

Also, the true dissadvantage to the PHB is the arc of the rod. With a watts link you don't have to worry about that. However, in most cases, people don't worry about it, since a car that is trying to corner hard will only have about 2-4 inches of travel up and down, this means the side to side movement in the arc will be minimal. Another dissadvantage to the PHB is you are changing the geometry of the axle's articulation. Meaning, if your right tire is on a curb and the left is on the street, you may have rubbing issues with wide tires. The pivot point of the PHB changes how the axle moves, so in the extreme motions of every day driving, you might run into issues. My right wheel rubs every time I pull into the driveway at my office because the ramp is steep, and if I drive in at an angle the wheel rubs. The other direction, it doesn't happen. And if I drive in straight it doesn't happen. Just the one angle. However, I think the benefits are worth it. Its all a question of application.
__________________
Aztec Gold 97GT.
MM CC Plates, Panhard Bar, SFC's & Tower Brace
Eibach Sway Bars
H&R Race Springs/Bilstein Shocks
MAC CAI, LT's, Catted H and Pro-Dumps
KB Boost-a-Spark
PI Swap
Spun Main Bearing...
Author of The Official Suspension Guide
 
Old January 8th, 2009, 10:29 PM   #89
Genibus Nitito Canus
 
HBK_2007's Avatar
 
1996 Mustang GT
next year
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,158
Default

Originally Posted by ModMustang97GT View Post
Tell me what you want, I'll tell you what you need.
i want a bag of $100 bills...

Originally Posted by ModMustang97GT View Post
What kind of car's are those? Thats not a mustang suspension, atleast not 96-04.

Also, the true dissadvantage to the PHB is the arc of the rod. With a watts link you don't have to worry about that. However, in most cases, people don't worry about it, since a car that is trying to corner hard will only have about 2-4 inches of travel up and down, this means the side to side movement in the arc will be minimal. Another dissadvantage to the PHB is you are changing the geometry of the axle's articulation. Meaning, if your right tire is on a curb and the left is on the street, you may have rubbing issues with wide tires. The pivot point of the PHB changes how the axle moves, so in the extreme motions of every day driving, you might run into issues. My right wheel rubs every time I pull into the driveway at my office because the ramp is steep, and if I drive in at an angle the wheel rubs. The other direction, it doesn't happen. And if I drive in straight it doesn't happen. Just the one angle. However, I think the benefits are worth it. Its all a question of application.
i spend a total of 10 mins on my road (5 each way) every day. do u think a watts link is better than a phb?
__________________
Red 1996 GT: JLT RAI, Steeda Underdrive pullies, Stewart Waterpump; nothing to brag about
Black 2009 45th aniverary edition GT 5 speed: K&N CAI, BBK Twin 62mm Throttle Body, BBK Underdrive Pullies, some type of exhaust, "leveling kit"
 
Old January 8th, 2009, 10:38 PM   #90
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
2003 gt
not so soon@probably not enough
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 1,742
Default

the first one is a mustang, second I don't know. A watts link isn't cheap different tires/springs/whatever would easily be more cost effective for ride quality. I'm only getting a watts link/tq arm because I can make everything for half the cost or less.
__________________
want boost? im selling my stuff, from ported plenum/tb to injectors, head unit, maf, power pipe etc... pm me
 
Old January 8th, 2009, 11:19 PM   #91
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Jazzer The Cat's Avatar
 
2002 s281
19.34@42.259
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Marin County
Posts: 1,318
Default

Originally Posted by HBK_2007 View Post
i want a bag of $100 bills..."


Jazzer
__________________
'02 GR-40/SLA s281 #0014

HD video from Jazzer The Ego

Choosing a new tire

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Old January 8th, 2009, 11:21 PM   #92
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
Jazzer The Cat's Avatar
 
2002 s281
19.34@42.259
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Marin County
Posts: 1,318
Default

Originally Posted by ModMustang97GT View Post
Ok, if you want to keep a smooth ride you do not want to get the poly bushings. They are much stiffer. And as far as getting them on your LCA's, I would personally say its worth it. They will be stiffer and rougher, but I don't know how long you spend on that gravel road of yours. I can tell you that with my Race springs and Bilstein HD's, its actually smoother on the really tiny quick bumps, but murder on the big ones. The reason is my wheel rate is much better.

OK important definition here. Your WHEEL RATE
The force it takes for your tire to move up and down. This means how quickly your tire will move into the bumps on the road. You calculate it by the spring rate multiplied by the leverage. In the case of your stock front suspension. Your spring is roughly 1/3 - 1/4 of the way from the pivot point to the wheel. This means you have a 1/3 to 1/4 mechanical advantage on your wheel. So, with my 800 lbs/in springs, I have a wheel rate closer to 200-250 lbs/in. And my force on the bottom of my car is closer to 2/3 - 3/4 advantage. Meaning I feel 3/4 of the bump, and have 1/4 the wheel reaction time it could.

This is the main reason coil overs are so much lower in spring rate. A 300 lbs spring will get 90% of its force on the tire. And the same amount on the car. meaning you will feel roughly half the force on the car and gain 50% more force on the wheel. This leads to better handling and more comfortable ride. Its a pretty simple no brainer.

The problem of course is the cost. You look at the cost of coil overs and think, damn I can't swing that. But let me break it down. Your CC plates are necessary any way, they add strength and adjustability that you need. You won't be buying any sway bars, because they will hurt your handling with the coil overs. You will want to buy new shocks/struts anyways, to match with your new fancy springs. So if you lay it all out.

Spring Setup

$200 - CC plates
$270 - Sway Bars
$550 - Shocks/Struts
$240 - Springs

$1260 - TOTAL

Coil Over Setup
$200 - CC plates
No Sway Bars
$550 Shocks/Struts
$360 Coil Overs - Front
$450 Coil Overs - Rear
$1600 - TOTAL (their package)

Thats $400 more, and you will never upgrade it again. Plus you will have better handling, smoother ride and adjustable ride height.
Dude! This is a SPECTACULAR write-up

I wanted to give you some major props on the scales, but I guess I gave you some earlier and won't let me do it now
__________________
'02 GR-40/SLA s281 #0014

HD video from Jazzer The Ego

Choosing a new tire

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Old January 8th, 2009, 11:26 PM   #93
Genibus Nitito Canus
 
HBK_2007's Avatar
 
1996 Mustang GT
next year
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,158
Default

is this a sticky?
__________________
Red 1996 GT: JLT RAI, Steeda Underdrive pullies, Stewart Waterpump; nothing to brag about
Black 2009 45th aniverary edition GT 5 speed: K&N CAI, BBK Twin 62mm Throttle Body, BBK Underdrive Pullies, some type of exhaust, "leveling kit"
 
Old January 9th, 2009, 06:05 PM   #94
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
ModMustang97GT's Avatar
 
1997 Mustang GT
Faster than an s4
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,315
Default

Yes this is a sticky. And my response to the differences of a PHB and Watts link is in my reply to the big post with pictures above. The bottom line is the Watts link does a better job, but is more expensive, harder to install, and over kill in most no extreme applications. Of course, one thing I am not clear on, some people have made me wonder if my normal exhaust would fit with the watt's link. So I wouldn't have to have dumps. If that was the case, It would be worth the price difference. My ears are already messed up from driving my car with LT's Catted H and Dumps. Thing sets are car alarms at 2k rpm.
__________________
Aztec Gold 97GT.
MM CC Plates, Panhard Bar, SFC's & Tower Brace
Eibach Sway Bars
H&R Race Springs/Bilstein Shocks
MAC CAI, LT's, Catted H and Pro-Dumps
KB Boost-a-Spark
PI Swap
Spun Main Bearing...
Author of The Official Suspension Guide
 
Old January 10th, 2009, 04:34 AM   #95
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
2003 gt
not so soon@probably not enough
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 1,742
Default

Well... I will have all of my exhaust, and a watts link.
__________________
want boost? im selling my stuff, from ported plenum/tb to injectors, head unit, maf, power pipe etc... pm me
 
Old January 10th, 2009, 03:21 PM   #96
Genibus Nitito Canus
 
HBK_2007's Avatar
 
1996 Mustang GT
next year
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,158
Default

where did u get ur suspension mods?
__________________
Red 1996 GT: JLT RAI, Steeda Underdrive pullies, Stewart Waterpump; nothing to brag about
Black 2009 45th aniverary edition GT 5 speed: K&N CAI, BBK Twin 62mm Throttle Body, BBK Underdrive Pullies, some type of exhaust, "leveling kit"
 
Old January 10th, 2009, 05:12 PM   #97
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
2003 gt
not so soon@probably not enough
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 1,742
Default

Work? I am making my stuff at work, off the clock.
__________________
want boost? im selling my stuff, from ported plenum/tb to injectors, head unit, maf, power pipe etc... pm me
 
Old January 10th, 2009, 05:35 PM   #98
Newbie
 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5
Default

good stuff
 
Old January 10th, 2009, 08:42 PM   #99
Genibus Nitito Canus
 
HBK_2007's Avatar
 
1996 Mustang GT
next year
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,158
Default

Originally Posted by DickH View Post
Work? I am making my stuff at work, off the clock.
u made them? nice. pics?
__________________
Red 1996 GT: JLT RAI, Steeda Underdrive pullies, Stewart Waterpump; nothing to brag about
Black 2009 45th aniverary edition GT 5 speed: K&N CAI, BBK Twin 62mm Throttle Body, BBK Underdrive Pullies, some type of exhaust, "leveling kit"
 
Old January 11th, 2009, 05:03 AM   #100
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
2003 gt
not so soon@probably not enough
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 1,742
Default

Well, I am not done, I still have a bit of work ahead of me. Discussion and pictures are in the thread I link to in my sig.
__________________
want boost? im selling my stuff, from ported plenum/tb to injectors, head unit, maf, power pipe etc... pm me
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: The Official Suspension Guide
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
a/c removal guide? dmac45 94-95 0 June 5th, 2008 06:12 PM
install guide 01silversnake 99-04 1 September 24th, 2007 09:05 AM
Guide To Building A 4.6 man_of_war2081 99-04 7 February 25th, 2007 06:40 PM
Funny Guide To Modification thewayshemoves The Clubhouse 0 December 24th, 2006 05:46 AM
289 hi-po guide 99mustang232 Classic Mustangs 6 December 5th, 2006 11:33 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:30 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.