[96GTRagTop]

Lollerskates

[nba1341]

whats the point of spending so much money building a car and not driving it

[Blue_coyote]

Originally Posted by 96GTRagTop ur kidding me right?

Nope. Try reading the sticky at the top of the Mustang II section.

u def are way out of line. do u know how many people come into the NPI forums and crack jokes about us being the slowest prudction v8 mustang........ atleast 2,3 times a week.

No, I don't. Because I have more couth than to go trolling in forums I have no interest in. ARE the NPI's the slowest? I would have figured the 79-83 255 would be slower. Even the stock Mustang II has more horsepower. And the only reason you guys get bashed more than the MII owners is because you get more traffic overall.

I wasn't bashing his car, i made a friggin joke.

So, I guess if I was to show up in the NPI forum and post that your car looks like a refugee from a Mitsubishi reject bin, then that would be just cracking a joke as well? There's a large enough crowd on the II-bashing bandwagon as it is...

I happened to click the "new post" feature and it came up.

So, you just couldn't resist making a useless and asinine comment to make yourself feel better?

U need to relax man, take the piston out of ur ass, and crack open a beer or something

Whatsamatter, can't take the heat for your comments? And FYI: I smoke my beer, so relaxing ain't a problem.

and the definition of a troll is a member that only signs on to cause problems, which is not what i'm about.

So, once again, if I come over to the NPI forum and just make insulting comments on member's rides, I'm not a troll? You probably don't want that. I can be a REALLY obnoxious SOB once I get started, and I'd be SURE to give you all due credit for my presence there

It's the fucking internet dude, don't shit ur pants over it.

Who's shitting? I'm enjoying a good vent at the expense of some guy who doesn't know any better than to make dumb and useless comments about the cars I happen to love.

Shall i send BWAL over with a tampon?

Sure, My wife's running low on 'em. One of our huskies decided they'd make a nice light snack.

[96GTRagTop]

i hope they were atleast clean........ that be disgusting.....

and look, i wasnt in here trying to cause problems. I didn't even know i was in the mustang II forum. I clicked "new posts"

and like u said about me not being able to take the heat of my comments, well if u can't take the heat ur car brings, maybe u shouldn't be drivng one.

we can sit here all day picking each other apart. It was a friggin joke man.

hell, i want u to tell me whats so negative about a Pinto. My dad used to have one. Big Black on Rob n Big has one. Why u hating on them so much?

[96GTRagTop]

Originally Posted by nba1341 whats the point of spending so much money building a car and not driving it

because it's your's

I rarely drive my car, sometimes weeks on end. But when i do take her out, I enjoy her 10x more. U really can't appreciate a worked car for what it is, if it's ur DD and ur picking up ur groceries in her

[Blue_coyote]

The "new posts" feature lists what forum a post is in, so if you didn't know it was in the II section, that's YOUR bad, not mine

Oh, I can take the heat. I don't stew about it though. I don't bite. I bite BACK

Nothing against Pinto's. At least they ain't Fairmonts

Problem with your "joke" is that its tired, old, not overly funny, lacks a punchline, and contributed ZERO to the discussion, regardless of what forum you thought you were posting in.

If you don't like the response your comment brought, try paying attention to what you're posting, and where you're posting it next time...

[nba1341]

i love how blue coyote is trying to defend his precious mustang II

[Blue_coyote]

Originally Posted by nba1341 i love how blue coyote is trying to defend his precious mustang II

What thread are YOU reading, dumbass?

I've been tearing 96 a new one over a stupid post he made. Neither of us has been "defending" our cars. Its all been about attitude.

You fail yet again

[nba1341]

^once again he tries defending the mustang II

the car was a failed POS just admit it


this one might be nice but sorry thats 1 in a million

[Blue_coyote]

Originally Posted by nba1341 ^once again he tries defending the mustang II the car was a failed POS just admit it this one might be nice but sorry thats 1 in a million

Time for you to get back on the shortbus. And my "failed POS" will out handle your Rustang any day of the week. There, NOW you can say I've made a comment defending my II in this thread.

Did the 65 even come with disc brakes from the factory? Or were front drums still "state of the art" technology?

Over a million units sold in 5 years. Yup, quite the profitable "failed POS" for Ford.

Astound me with more of your ignorance, peckerneck...

[nba1341]

Originally Posted by Blue_coyote Time for you to get back on the shortbus. And my "failed POS" will out handle your Rustang any day of the week. There, NOW you can say I've made a comment defending my II in this thread. Did the 65 even come with disc brakes from the factory? Or were front drums still "state of the art" technology? Over a million units sold in 5 years. Yup, quite the profitable "failed POS" for Ford. Astound me with more of your ignorance, peckerneck...

compared to 1 million units sold in the first year

lol mustang II almost killed the mustang lol

so many people drive them today don't they i see them on the street everywhere i go

nope no one is that stupid

[HMUSN]

blue.. he is just trying to get under your skin. remind yourself that your talking to someone still in highschool and think back to most peoples mentality at that time.

[Blue_coyote]

Originally Posted by HMUSN blue.. he is just trying to get under your skin. remind yourself that your talking to someone still in highschool and think back to most peoples mentality at that time.

That's okay. His homosexual need to be under a guy's skin won't get him too far with me, although he does type like his pussy needs a massage.

Just like on a few other Mustang boards with idiots of his caliber, I'm in it for the fun. Someone takes a potshot at the cars I love, its open season for me to get my jollies at their expense.

High school? Damn, and here I thought he was a 9 year old tirebiter, all proud of Mommy's ponycar.

His ignorance truly IS astounding though. Out of the top ten selling years of Mustangs, the 5 years of Mustang II hold three of them. When the first generation can say that over half of the era sold enough to take 30% of the top ten, then MAYBE he will have something to talk about besides how his ass hurts from the reaming he puts it through A million in the first year? I believe that figure encompasses a year and a half, NOT a year (as any first gen Mustang owner with half a clue should know...oh yeah, I forgot, its nba. My bad)

Its kinda fun reading his ignorant posts, and responding to them like his opinion means more than the shit I left in the toilet this morning.

I gotta mention, though, that the fastback he's so proud of looks, in my opinion, like an unsuccessful 'Cuda knockoff. The early fastbacks are the only Mustangs I dislike more than the 79-04 eras.

After all, owning an early fastback (or a Foxbody) is something any moron with a goldcard and a computer can do. Pretty much ALL eras of the Mustang are designed after Ford's econo-crap lines, which is something far too many "classic" owners conveniently forget (or in nba's case, were too stupid to realise in the first place)

[HMUSN]

well put.

[nba1341]

your stats need proven links from proven websites

or else you /fail


here is what this website has to say about your beloved car

"Mustang II Forum - Often considered the 'dark age' of the Mustang (1974 - 1978), the fuel crisis prompted Ford to build a less powerful V6, offer a 4cylinder engine, and even offered no V8 powerplant initially."

[Blue_coyote]

Originally Posted by nba1341 your stats need proven links from proven websites or else you /fail here is what this website has to say about your beloved car "Mustang II Forum - Often considered the 'dark age' of the Mustang (1974 - 1978), the fuel crisis prompted Ford to build a less powerful V6, offer a 4cylinder engine, and even offered no V8 powerplant initially."

Well, according to ClassicMustang.com AND K.A.R., you're full of shit, dumbass. They list total Mustang production for 64.5 and 65 combined as under 681k, but I guess just like pecker length, that equals a million in your eyes, eh?

So, before I bother to back up MY "facts" maybe you need to back up YOURS, eh?

You fail at even FAILING

[nba1341]

Originally Posted by Blue_coyote Well, according to ClassicMustang.com AND K.A.R., you're full of shit, dumbass. They list total Mustang production for 64.5 and 65 combined as under 681k, but I guess just like pecker length, that equals a million in your eyes, eh? So, before I bother to back up MY "facts" maybe you need to back up YOURS, eh? You fail at even FAILING

once again you fail

"as one of the most successful product launches in automotive history. The[colored] Mustang sold over one million units in its first 18 months on the market.[/color] The Mustang created a new "pony car" class of cars by adapting the "long hood, short deck" look of sports cars to compact sedans. It spawned many competitors such as the Diesel Place - Duramax Diesel Discussion Forums, and inspired smaller import coupes such as the Toyota Celica and Ford Capri. The Mustang has remained in continuous production to present day after many decades and numerous revisions."

Ford Mustang - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[HMUSN]

wiki is written by normal people and is subject to edit by normal people.

try a better source. like a professional one.

[nba1341]

Originally Posted by HMUSN wiki is written by normal people and is subject to edit by normal people. try a better source. like a professional one.

ok will do i have one actually in book form

[Blue_coyote]

Originally Posted by HMUSN wiki is written by normal people and is subject to edit by normal people. try a better source. like a professional one.

Oh, give the child a break, man! Wiki is THE definitive source of facts!

EVERY reliable source I found pegs the 64.5 and 65 Mustang production numbers at just shy of 681k, so nba MUST know better than any "official" reference source out there.

Unlike nba (BTW: is that an acronym for "No Brain Attached"? Sure seems that way) I know better than to take Wiki at face value, or I would have cited "facts" from their references as well.

So, get on that, failure-boy. Time to attempt to salvage some credibility...