| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1
|
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,055
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
pacesetter Longtube header review 1996 pi swap
hey guys so i had some pacesetter headers installed on my 1996 auto with a pi swap and since pacesetter is a cheaper brand and most people badmouth it without ever providing any real world proof of them not working.
the part number used was 70-3230 I believe and I acquired them for 150 dollars via amazon.com. I bought ford oem MLS gaskets for them instead of the paper one supplied. the 70-3230 longtube headers comes with -gasket -wiring and shrink tubing to extend 02 sensors. -pacesetter stickers ( )anyways like most people said in previous threads my mechanic had a bitch of a time doing the headers but nothing that wasnt expected. The headers sound and feels great, i would reccomend them to anyone looking to avoid spending 400+ on a set of headers. while i hear everyone say only the expensive brands fit these ones fit just fine from what i can see. It seems these headers clear everything just fine. I had the shop fab me up a custom X pipe to route to my side pipes and it sounds crazy, never thought my 2v would sound like such a beast props to pacesetter for making an affordable alternative ![]() EDIT: Only design flaw as far as i can see is that on my automatic the upstream 02 sensor bungs are located on the inside of the primary which interferes with the transmission ( I assume this is not the case with the 5 speed since its probably a bit smaller) Took about 5 minutes for my exhaust guy to seal up the old one and weld a bung a couple inches down the primary. Last edited by sj408; May 25th, 2011 at 12:29 AM. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,055
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
80 somethin views and no response..... well i guess you all enjoy paying 500+ extra dollars on headers to achieve similar if not the same end results
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I am getting ready to put some of this same brand of headers on my 96 Cobra and I have heard nothing but bad things about them. Can any one say exactly what the problem is with them? Is it the weld quality? If that is the only problem, that will not be a problem for me as I have been a exotic metals welder for over twenty years. I have bought some of the most expensive brands out and still had to reweld them due to crappy quality. So is that the only problem with them? Or is it just that poor of a fit up? Please let me know.
__________________
DYNO numbers are much like benchmarks for a computer.......but if you can't play the game for shit...........what does it matter
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,055
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
only REAL issue ive heard with them (other than key-board mechanics just bashing them with no real world evidence to back up outlandish claims) is that on some of the ls1/lt1 models early in production the area around the primaries would rust out but ive heard they fixed that issue quite a while back. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 23
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Thanks for the info man. I will use the money I save on the headers for a more feature rich nos kit
__________________
DYNO numbers are much like benchmarks for a computer.......but if you can't play the game for shit...........what does it matter
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,055
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
yeah man i would have never bothered with headers if i had to pay 350+ and close to that for install.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Just Another Stang
1996 Mustan GT
N/A
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Canyon Lake,Texas
Posts: 50
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Other than flow characteristics of the primaries & the O2 bungs needing relocated I can't seem to find a fault in them... I have a '96 Stang GT 5spd & I'm sure these headers will do just fine! Thanks for the helpful review bro...
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
D.G.
2007 Mustang GT/CS
9.5@76.52 1/8 when it was stock
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: stationed in 619 reppin 904
Posts: 326
![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
Nice mod man, if i wasn't in Cali and back in the southeast i woulda done that a loooong time ago
__________________
![]() 2007 GT/CS, k&n filter, flowtech exhaust, strut brace, smoked tails, frpp lower control arms, front/rear swaybar poly bushings, sequential tails harness, sct tune catted xpipe |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Newbie
1998 mustang gt
15.2@89
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Lebanon,MO
Posts: 13
Blog Entries: 1
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
thanks for the review. i am actually ordering a set right now.. def appreciate people who are not wanting to blow 600 on headers. are you running a x or h pipe?
__________________
You can live in your car, But you cant race your house. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/parts/219878-pacesetter-longtube-header-review-1996-pi-swap.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| Thread pacesetter Longtube header review 1996 pi swap | Forums at Modded Mustangs | BoardReader | This thread | Refback | September 20th, 2011 04:53 AM | |
Threads Similar to: pacesetter Longtube header review 1996 pi swap
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pacesetter longtube headers/H-pipe kit | Twatwaffle | 2005 - 2010 | 21 | August 26th, 2011 09:33 AM |
| longtube header install | Speedstang302 | 96-98 | 77 | March 15th, 2010 08:02 PM |
| Longtube header question | ndfrspd | 99-04 | 4 | May 22nd, 2009 03:21 PM |
| JBA Longtube Header Package!! | Derek@DRI | 2005 - 2010 | 1 | May 12th, 2008 01:03 PM |