turbo or supercharger

wadepetersen · October 30th, 2007, 01:21 PM

which is better
i no the basics superchargers are more expensive and easier to install
but turbos get more power
I also no that superchargers dont lag
I alos no that turbos use wasted engery and that superchargers use energy to make power
is there anything else that i should no

tlr96 · October 30th, 2007, 01:23 PM

turbos are more expensive, but if you have the money thats the way to go.

BWAL09 · October 30th, 2007, 02:34 PM

:homo

twin screw superchargers have no lag, but centrifugals do.. a centrifugal is more like a belt driven trubocharger.. centrifugal has more parasitic loss than a twin screw, but a turbocharger has no parasitic loss

single turbocharger FTW

88mstang · October 30th, 2007, 02:34 PM

TURBO BUT I DO LIKE A KENNE BELL

casper1773 · October 31st, 2007, 03:11 AM

Another challenge with boosting a engine is...... knowing what your compression ratio is and how much boost you can do before posibly needing to change headgasket designs and need stronger headbolts.

TurboLX · October 31st, 2007, 03:26 PM

read my boost article on the top of the page

October 30th, 2007, 01:21 PM	#1
wadepetersen Regular Join Date: May 2007 Posts: 369	turbo or supercharger which is better i no the basics superchargers are more expensive and easier to install but turbos get more power I also no that superchargers dont lag I alos no that turbos use wasted engery and that superchargers use energy to make power is there anything else that i should no

October 30th, 2007, 01:23 PM	#2
tlr96 Hardcore Enthusiast 1996 Mustang GT Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Effingham, IL Posts: 1,794	turbos are more expensive, but if you have the money thats the way to go. __________________ view my garage for pics and modifications listen to my exhaust video 1 video 2 video 3

October 30th, 2007, 02:34 PM	#3
BWAL09 Any hole is my goal! 2021 Mustang V12 Quad Turbo with nawz Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: modified88dreamer likes penis in and around his mouth Posts: 9,962	:homo twin screw superchargers have no lag, but centrifugals do.. a centrifugal is more like a belt driven trubocharger.. centrifugal has more parasitic loss than a twin screw, but a turbocharger has no parasitic loss single turbocharger FTW __________________ 1989 LX 5.0 1990 LX 5.0 1993 LX 2.3 notch 1992 LX 5.0 1997 Cobra Buy one get one free. PM me i founded the founder of the cobra club

Threads Similar to: turbo or supercharger
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
turbo, twin turbo, or supercharger?	mustangman87	5.0 Mustangs	28	September 22nd, 2007 10:20 AM
Supercharger or Turbo?	Stangbro8994	V6 Mustangs	46	May 20th, 2007 12:50 PM
turbo or supercharger	Danderson	V6 Mustangs	39	April 12th, 2007 12:26 AM
Supercharger, Twin Turbo, and Single Turbo	justinsstang	Power Adders	24	March 7th, 2007 10:07 PM
Turbo or supercharger?	98StangGT	96-98	13	June 24th, 2006 07:36 PM

Sponsored Links	Remove Advertisements
Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement

October 30th, 2007, 02:34 PM	#4
88mstang Regular Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Stafford,VA Posts: 88	TURBO BUT I DO LIKE A KENNE BELL

October 31st, 2007, 03:26 PM	#6
TurboLX Banned 1990 Mustang LX Turbo 9.71@141.6 mph Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: NY Posts: 8,780	read my boost article on the top of the page

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 PM.
Contact Us - Modded Mustangs - Privacy Statement - Top
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company. Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.