Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > General Tech > Poweradders

Discussing Turbo Size, A/R and Trim in the Poweradders Forum. A/R Explanation A/R is the rated volumetric efficiency of a turbos 2 sections, ...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old October 26th, 2005, 10:52 PM   #1
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In my house.
Posts: 995
Default

Turbo Size, A/R and Trim


A/R Explanation
A/R is the rated volumetric efficiency of a turbos 2 sections, so to speak. Imagine if you have a garden hose spraying water out at a pinwheel
with the hose open ended, the pinwheel spins okay. Put a nozzle on it an the pinwheel will spin like mad.

There are issues with the nozzle on the end, you lose volume but gain pressure. With the nozzle off you gain volume, but lose pressure and you can't turn the pinwheel as much.

Simply put, on small displacement engines a smaller A/R is better, on large displacement engine a larger A/R is better due to exhaust volume.

A larger A/R will spool later and provide a higher power band, if your engine is capable of reaching the RPMS it should be used in.

You can't cross compare different types of housings and wheels, but if you have a typical T3/TO4E 57 trim with a stage 3 exhaust wheel and a .48 A/R housing, it might have a powerband of 3000-7000, with the .63 it might be 4000-8000, and with a .82 A/R housing it might be 5000-9000. If you have headwork and cams that stop pulling at 8000 RPM's, it's smart to run the .63 A/R housing. If you have a fully ported head and huge cams that will make power till 9000, the .82 A/R housing would be a better choice. <Source>


<Picture Source>





<Picture Source>


This rx7 link I provided tells you how to calculate the trim of a compressor wheel. Just a little fyi when calculating trims, you can calculate it in inches or mm it doesn't matter. Trim is just the ratio of inducer/exducer. The trim will come out the same whether you calculate inches or mm. The link also tells you how a higher or lower trim number determines where the compressor is the most efficient. Also check out the previously provided Garrett link to look at the products menu and the tech menu. You can use the products->turbochargers menu to calculate the trim of the compressor wheels. Use the formula in the rx7 club site or Garrett site to calculate the trim.
 
Old October 26th, 2005, 11:08 PM   #2
Regular
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 184
Default

great write up. Definitly helpful although keep in mind most mustangs redline somewhere between 5500 and 7000 rpms however it sounds like the smaller trim wont do as much. Is there a perfect turbo for a low revving motor with alot of displacement exhaust?
 
Old October 27th, 2005, 10:19 PM   #3
Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: In my house.
Posts: 995
Default

That's for you to decide. The write up shows you how to figure out the proper A/R and trim necessary to get a good, fast spooling turbo to help the low end torque grunt.

The part about the high revving was because it was written about Honda's. You can disregard that, unless you wanna build a 4.6 with an 8k redline and turbo it. lol
 
Old November 27th, 2007, 01:16 AM   #4
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
e3sean's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: arizona
Posts: 2,638
Default

Originally Posted by 2000Si View Post
A/R Explanation
A/R is the rated volumetric efficiency of a turbos 2 sections, so to speak. Imagine if you have a garden hose spraying water out at a pinwheel
with the hose open ended, the pinwheel spins okay. Put a nozzle on it an the pinwheel will spin like mad.

There are issues with the nozzle on the end, you lose volume but gain pressure. With the nozzle off you gain volume, but lose pressure and you can't turn the pinwheel as much.

Simply put, on small displacement engines a smaller A/R is better, on large displacement engine a larger A/R is better due to exhaust volume.

A larger A/R will spool later and provide a higher power band, if your engine is capable of reaching the RPMS it should be used in.

You can't cross compare different types of housings and wheels, but if you have a typical T3/TO4E 57 trim with a stage 3 exhaust wheel and a .48 A/R housing, it might have a powerband of 3000-7000, with the .63 it might be 4000-8000, and with a .82 A/R housing it might be 5000-9000. If you have headwork and cams that stop pulling at 8000 RPM's, it's smart to run the .63 A/R housing. If you have a fully ported head and huge cams that will make power till 9000, the .82 A/R housing would be a better choice. <Source>


<Picture Source>





<Picture Source>


This rx7 link I provided tells you how to calculate the trim of a compressor wheel. Just a little fyi when calculating trims, you can calculate it in inches or mm it doesn't matter. Trim is just the ratio of inducer/exducer. The trim will come out the same whether you calculate inches or mm. The link also tells you how a higher or lower trim number determines where the compressor is the most efficient. Also check out the previously provided Garrett link to look at the products menu and the tech menu. You can use the products->turbochargers menu to calculate the trim of the compressor wheels. Use the formula in the rx7 club site or Garrett site to calculate the trim.
bump i wanted to bring this back up it has been most helpful
 
Old March 11th, 2008, 07:04 PM   #5
Look Ma! My First Post!
 
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1
Default

@2000SI


Thanks Sir!


Very nice and interesting.

My knowlegde about turbos is limited and altough your explaination is very exact I still have problems to determine what size of turbo I should take.

I build a 68 Impala with 540cid BBC with Dart 320 alu-heads and want to go with a twin turbo setup.

I have enough torque through the huge displacement but I would like to have additional power in the mid to high rpm - range.

From your explaination the 48 A/R housing would be the right one since my engine got redline at 7000rpm but I will rev it only up to 6500-6800maximum rpm. I have around 9,6:1 compression and threrefor I will not go higher than 6 - maximum 9psi. I have bought 2-1/4" upsweep dragster headers and will convert them to nice turbo headers.

What is your recommedation for a turbo, is a pair of T4īs to small for 6-9psi?

Also I would like to keep down with the weight since the BBC got enough weight already and I have been told that a bigger turbo got around 50pounds, is that really true.

Thanks Hannes

.
 
Old March 19th, 2008, 10:32 PM   #6
Regular
 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 440
Default

good info, but your a/r suggestions are well off... Im not even an expert, but I can tell you that a 76mm w/ .96 will make boost around 3200
__________________
Considering selling my car to fund my race car: take a look and tell me what you think.
http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums...ml#post1041280
 
Old April 17th, 2008, 04:44 PM   #7
Newbie
 
SpeedSicks's Avatar
 
'79 2.3 Turbo Stang Coupe
Working on it...
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Riverton
Posts: 20
Default

Originally Posted by banned View Post
good info, but your a/r suggestions are well off... Im not even an expert, but I can tell you that a 76mm w/ .96 will make boost around 3200
that depends on the motor that the turbo is linked to, mind you..
__________________
addicted to tuning 2.3 turbo cars no doubt

06 mazdaspeed6 2.3T direct injected DOHC 6spd AWD
79 stang coupe 2.3T old school injected SOHC 4spd RWD
63 F250 highboy 4x4 convert, 428, all original body, restored to custom. for sale
 
Old Yesterday, 10:14 PM   #8
Regular
 
1989 LX Vert - 1993 Notch
Fast
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 164
Default

Picking A/R comes down to spool time vs. top end power band.
You need to decide where you want your power band and plan accordingly from
the start.

Power band should not only decide A/R, but cam selection, heads, intake
compression ratio, rear gears ..... there's a lot to this and no magical
method or perfect right or wrong answer.


I'll add my bit to the sticky.


Using and reading Compressor Maps


First we need engine air requirements.

( cid X .5 X Ve X rpm ) / 1728 = cfm
( 14.7 + psi ) / 14.7 = P.R. (press. ratio)

P.R x CFM = boosted CFM

boosted CFM / 13 = lbs/min


So we have a 302 with Ve of 80% and 6,000rpm power band
wanting to run 15psi.

( 302 X .5 X .80 X 6,000 ) / 1728 = 420cfm
( 14.7 + 15 ) / 14.7 = 2.02 PR.

420 X 2.02 = 848 cfm boosted
848 / 13 = 65.2 lbs/min

65 lbs/min and 2.02 PR are the numbers needed to plot
out on your compressor map.

You also need to do the calculation at the rpm that full
boost will first be reached and make sure it does not cross the
surge limit line to the left at the map.

You want your plotted points to remain inside the map and as
close to the center as possible, while using smallest turbo that will
meet your goals. For twins just divide the turbo load in half.

Good link for turbo and s/c compressor maps.
Same calculations can be used on an s/c compressor map too.
Turbo and Supercharger Maps
__________________
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Turbo Size, A/R and Trim
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
trim kit stanged out Visual 6 August 9th, 2007 01:10 AM
I need some trim. dr.gonzo 5.0 Mustangs 10 June 15th, 2007 07:08 PM
Trim Repaint.... DSEZ V6 Mustangs 9 January 15th, 2007 02:32 AM
Dash Trim cliff Classic Mustangs 3 November 19th, 2006 01:20 PM
Trim Detailer? weems Visual 3 October 11th, 2006 09:11 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:43 PM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.