[97mustanggt]

haha dam 5.0 drivers....the fumes of there cars are screwing with there heads...

[thorpedo26]

Originally Posted by garyvang It must just be my mustang then because yesterday i race a white 2003 svt cobra and spanked him rolling and off the launch. It seem so weak for a svt cobra mustang. They are over rated and fox body are under rated. And really, i killed a mach 1 from a roll but it was an automatic. Dont know if that would matter much off a roll.

maybe it was a fobra

[JTS]

Originally Posted by Twist 2 Go did they know you were racing them?

LMFAOOO!!!!

[JTS]

[QUOTE=garyvang;19258] i killed a mach 1 from a roll but it was an automatic. /QUOTE]

LMAOO mach 1's are not auto sorry lol
and even if it was your still not beating it lol

[JTS]

hahaha

[HMUSN]

[quote=JTS;1340894]

Originally Posted by garyvang i killed a mach 1 from a roll but it was an automatic. /QUOTE] LMAOO mach 1's are not auto sorry lol and even if it was your still not beating it lol

mach 1's come in auto and 5speed.

[86_Notch]

i didnt' read all the posts, but with a set of welds , dragradials ( worn out ) and 373s i ran a 13.79 @ 100 mph in a clapped out 89 hatch that i paid 1000 for ( over 160,000 miles , original engine too ) i've seen some quick newer modulars and they are to be respected but all i've got to say is that unless you have a cobra enjoy those powered metal connecting rods while they last !!!!

[JTS]

[quote=HMUSN;1342306]

Originally Posted by JTS mach 1's come in auto and 5speed.

Wow i did not know that at all lol thanks for tellin me i had to go online and search it ive never seen one auto hahah

well either way hes not beatin a mach

[HMUSN]

I think I might be able to handle one

[dmachine22]

This thread is complete madness haha and filled with more bullshit than i've seen in awhile, but thats why I love this site something new everyday.

[Monk]

Originally Posted by Black*Death 5.0 is 302 CID vs 4.6 281 CID. i agree that 5.0 is larger but the later Foxes aren't as light as you think. The 1987-1993 foxes weighed antwhere from 2754 to 3350 pounds. SN95 stangs weighed anywhere from 3055-3565 pounds. Some overlap there so blamket statement that all foxes are lighter is incorrect, but most of the time they will be lighter. i could see a stock fox beating a SN95 GT though. New EDge would be a bit tougher though.

...my 5.0 weights under 2700 with me in it, weight varies depending on audio-equipment... And it doesn't look like a brick...

[greenZ28]

Originally Posted by garyvang It must just be my mustang then because yesterday i race a white 2003 svt cobra and spanked him rolling and off the launch. It seem so weak for a svt cobra mustang. They are over rated and fox body are under rated. And really, i killed a mach 1 from a roll but it was an automatic. Dont know if that would matter much off a roll.

Sorry man, but you are a tard! Even with a terrible driver missing every gear twice a 2003 cobra would spank your a$$!!!!!

[MIKE 04 GT]

Originally Posted by garyvang It must just be my mustang then because yesterday i race a white 2003 svt cobra and spanked him rolling and off the launch. It seem so weak for a svt cobra mustang. They are over rated and fox body are under rated. And really, i killed a mach 1 from a roll but it was an automatic. Dont know if that would matter much off a roll.

wonder why the machs, and cobras cost more. stock 5.0 are not to fast i eat them in my 04 gt. 5.0 are fun to race in my buddys 94 civic though.

[MIKE 04 GT]

Originally Posted by greenZ28 Sorry man, but you are a tard! Even with a terrible driver missing every gear twice a 2003 cobra would spank your a$$!!!!!

+1

[bitemark46]

Adding a little fuel to the fire..... lol

1) I have yet to loose against a N/A stock longblock 302. The only ones that give me a run are H/C/I.
2) Show me 1 foxbody'd 302 running 11's N/A with stock H/C/I. Aint gonna happen.


<--- zips up flame suit.

[gragra73]

There is one guy with an 89 5.0 that races at Barona, which is a 1/8 mile track. No major mods. he removed the back and passenger seat, removed the A.C, installed a stall converter and is running slicks. He gets mid to high 8s. His corrected times are actually low to mid 8s.

[fox4.6]

Originally Posted by mdvaldosta The 99+ Mustangs will spank the all the 5 liters, including the 93 Cobra. 260 hp stock compared to 225, the Fox's are alittle lighter, but are high 14 second cars compared to low 14's for the 99+. If you spanked a 99+ GT or better then you must be a good driver and they were very poor.

So I guess this means my car should be faster than either a 93 or a 2000 because I have a 93 body with a 2000 4.6 in it. Therefore I have more power than a 93 in a ligher car than the 2000.