Forums at Modded Mustangs
Home Register FAQ Members List Calendar Blogs Garage Gallery Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   Forums at Modded Mustangs > Mustang Forums > Racer's Corner

Discussing Tuned Stock GT vs Bad Tuned Modded GT in the Racer's Corner Forum. Originally Posted by Darrell What you feel is in your head. Your mind is telling ...

       

Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old January 4th, 2007, 11:45 PM   #21
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1999 Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,309
Default

Originally Posted by Darrell


What you feel is in your head. Your mind is telling you that the engine is making more horsepower and getting better gas mileage because you are using higher octane because that is the extent of the education you have on the subject. However, that is not how an internal combustion engine operates. If you put it on a dyno you will see that you may have actually lost a few horsepower versus the lower octane fuel. Same goes for fuel mileage.
theres no way you're going to LOOSE power by upping the octane. you may not get anything out of it but itll act as a buffer against detonation if worst comes to worst. you may not get anything out of it on a factory tune but it wont hurt you
 
Old January 5th, 2007, 02:37 AM   #22
MM Ninjas!
 
Darrell's Avatar
 
1990 Mustang LX
9.36@143 mph
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 6,579
Default

Originally Posted by Invictus


theres no way you're going to LOOSE power by upping the octane. you may not get anything out of it but itll act as a buffer against detonation if worst comes to worst. you may not get anything out of it on a factory tune but it wont hurt you
Would you like to place a bet on that? We will run a stock 5 liter on a dyno. The first pull will be with 87-89 octane fuel. The second run will be with VP C16 race fuel. The engine will make less power with C16, I'll guarantee it. Internal combustion engines are most efficient when they are on the verge of detonation. Just enough octane so the engine does not detonate makes the most horsepower. That is a fact.
__________________
Racing in memory of Dave Bandt 11/19/69 - 3/23/08
"he's traded his wheels for wings"

Professor of Natural Aspiration
Thanks to: Artie at Trick Flow, Dave at Team Z Motorsports, Brian at Total Engine Airflow and Harold at Furo Racecraft
 
Old January 5th, 2007, 08:00 AM   #23
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
FaStStAnG5-0's Avatar
 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 1,181
Default

darrells got ya on that one... it is definately true... i spoke to my engine builder all about different octanes & what not when we rebuilt my sbc350 for my truck... plus i just would argue with darrel cause he knows his shit!!!
__________________
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2461223
1994 GT: MSD 6AL, BBK O/R H-Pipe, Dynomax Race Bullet mufflers, 3:73 rear, Hurst Short Shifter, MAC cold air intake & much more coming soon!
 
Old January 5th, 2007, 12:59 PM   #24
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
1999 Mustang
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,309
Default

ah, with c16 i could understand but 87 vs 93 same concept i guess but I just don't see a motor loosing efficiency with such a small octane increase. he was talking about using supreme pump gas on a stock tune which imo is fine. but you're right i wouldn't run 117octane gas on my stock tune either lol
 
Old January 13th, 2007, 04:13 PM   #25
Enthusiast
 
2000 Mustang GT
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 869
Default

I dont believe it's possible to make more horsepower on a higher octane fuel without doing some tuning and/or timing adjustments unless your vehicle is tuned and timed to run on that octane already. Otherwise, power benefits should be "VERY" slim to none..
 
Old January 14th, 2007, 12:05 PM   #26
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Herrin Il
Posts: 2,241
Default

Mostly the extra power seems to be on take off only. So your not really getting more horsepower.
 
Old January 14th, 2007, 02:47 PM   #27
Hardcore Enthusiast
 
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On the trailer.......broke.
Posts: 1,261
Default

Darrell is 100% correct on this one. I was a tech at a GM stealership years ago and we had a guy from BG come in one time to do a demonstration on fuel systems and octane for us. Did you also know that the lower octane fuels burn cleaner than the higher octane fuels? The higher octane fuels have more carbon in them therefore leave more carbon deposits when burned which makes it more likely to start "labor knocking", fouling plugs and leave deposits on your valves which, over time, can keep them from performing properly.
 
Reply



Thread Tools


Threads Similar to: Tuned Stock GT vs Bad Tuned Modded GT
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stay Tuned JASonic The Clubhouse 27 October 19th, 2007 09:11 PM
vid of car after being tuned sonicblue Videos 3 May 27th, 2007 05:46 PM
Tuned Up MustangMo V6 Mustangs 14 May 16th, 2007 07:15 PM
finally tuned slow98gt 96-98 14 April 27th, 2007 06:34 PM
Is my car tuned? jagermiester 99-04 7 February 20th, 2007 07:09 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 AM.
Modded Mustangs is ©2005-2008, All Rights Reserved, And is Not Affiliated with Ford Motor Company.
Forum is powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Ent. Ltd. & SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.