| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#22 | |
|
MM Ninjas!
|
__________________
My daily driver has 16 cylinders and 4400hp @ 1000 rpm.... ![]() ***1988 Mustang GT - Stock....almost
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
darrells got ya on that one... it is definately true... i spoke to my engine builder all about different octanes & what not when we rebuilt my sbc350 for my truck... plus i just would argue with darrel cause he knows his shit!!!
__________________
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2461223 1994 GT: MSD 6AL, BBK O/R H-Pipe, Dynomax Race Bullet mufflers, 3:73 rear, Hurst Short Shifter, MAC cold air intake & much more coming soon! |
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
ah, with c16 i could understand but 87 vs 93 same concept i guess but I just don't see a motor loosing efficiency with such a small octane increase. he was talking about using supreme pump gas on a stock tune which imo is fine. but you're right i wouldn't run 117octane gas on my stock tune either lol
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Enthusiast
|
I dont believe it's possible to make more horsepower on a higher octane fuel without doing some tuning and/or timing adjustments unless your vehicle is tuned and timed to run on that octane already. Otherwise, power benefits should be "VERY" slim to none..
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Herrin Il
Posts: 2,238
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Mostly the extra power seems to be on take off only. So your not really getting more horsepower.
__________________
Offical MM Zepplineers crew member #4-Commander ![]()
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
Darrell is 100% correct on this one. I was a tech at a GM stealership years ago and we had a guy from BG come in one time to do a demonstration on fuel systems and octane for us. Did you also know that the lower octane fuels burn cleaner than the higher octane fuels? The higher octane fuels have more carbon in them therefore leave more carbon deposits when burned which makes it more likely to start "labor knocking", fouling plugs and leave deposits on your valves which, over time, can keep them from performing properly.
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Tuned Stock GT vs Bad Tuned Modded GT
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Stay Tuned | JASonic | The Clubhouse | 27 | October 19th, 2007 10:11 PM |
| vid of car after being tuned | sonicblue | Videos | 3 | May 27th, 2007 06:46 PM |
| Tuned Up | MustangMo | V6 Mustangs | 14 | May 16th, 2007 08:15 PM |
| finally tuned | slow98gt | 96-98 | 14 | April 27th, 2007 07:34 PM |
| Is my car tuned? | jagermiester | 99-04 | 7 | February 20th, 2007 08:09 PM |