|
|
| Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Blogs | Garage | Gallery | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Insurance |
| | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
February 16th, 2008, 05:19 PM
|
#1 |
|
Regular
Trans Am WS6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 288
 iTrader: 0 reviews
 |
5.0 vs. 5.0 liter race
who do you guys think will win...
a 1986 5.0 Mustang (in awesome shape with under 80,000 miles) -10.5" M/T slicks -BBK long tubes -BBK o/r h-pipe (dumped with no mufflers) -Steeda Tri-ax shifter -minor weight reduction -perfect T-5 transmission -or- a 2001 4.6 Mustang (also in great shape) -bone stock -automatic I have no idea on this one, I think its going to depend on the roll or if it is from a stop. Help me out... |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
February 16th, 2008, 05:20 PM
|
#2 |
|
Regular
Trans Am WS6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 288
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
suppossed to be 5.0 vs 4.6 sorry
|
|
|
|
February 16th, 2008, 05:25 PM
|
#3 |
|
Doc
 
1986 SVO
48.47@ 12.58
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 37,050
 iTrader: 11 reviews
|
the 4 eye will win
__________________
|
|
|
|
February 16th, 2008, 05:38 PM
|
#4 |
|
Regular
Trans Am WS6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 288
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
thats what i want to hear... my 4 eyes are actually covered up it looks kinda cool, it has a black cover
|
|
|
|
February 17th, 2008, 01:00 PM
|
#5 |
|
MM Fanatic
2002 Mustang GT
13.334 @ 106.27 w/2.01 60'
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,107
iTrader: 2 reviews
|
the 5.0 will win... barely though. All it'll take the 4.6 to pull on you though is, exhaust, and intake upgrades.
__________________
|
|
|
|
February 17th, 2008, 06:53 PM
|
#6 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: southcarolina
Posts: 1,354
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
i dunno i think the 4.6 is going to get ya.. go race and let us know!!!
__________________
|
|
|
|
February 17th, 2008, 06:57 PM
|
#7 |
|
Regular
2000 Mustang GT
13.7@101
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 156
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
My votes in for the 4.6, i might even put money on that race..
__________________
Studies show that 92% of kids listen to rap. If you are one of the 8% who still listens to real music put this in your signature. |
|
|
|
February 17th, 2008, 07:04 PM
|
#8 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1996 GT
Too Slow....
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: California/Nebraska
Posts: 2,181
iTrader: 0 reviews
 |
I think the 5.0 will win.....
__________________
1996 Mustang GT, Full PI Swap, MGW Shifter, Magnaflow Cat-back, K&N Filter MM Unite For Bubba |
|
|
|
February 17th, 2008, 08:05 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: southcarolina
Posts: 1,354
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
February 18th, 2008, 02:04 PM
|
#10 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: long island
Posts: 1,515
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
the 4.6 will take you
|
|
|
|
March 7th, 2008, 06:36 AM
|
#11 |
|
Regular
88 lx hatch
too slow
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 51
iTrader: 0 reviews
|
As long as the driver w/ the 86 can drive, he will win. If the 4.6 didn't have a stock slushbox, it would win. Seen similar races before.
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 5.0 vs. 5.0 liter race
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 4.6 Liter | mustang fanatic | 2005 - 2010 | 50 | January 6th, 2008 05:52 PM |
| My 4.6 liter... should i supercharge? | Wesf90 | 99-04 | 20 | October 29th, 2007 09:10 AM |
| HELP!!!!!! 5 Liter problems....... | hot89 | 5.0 Mustangs | 8 | August 10th, 2007 02:26 PM |
| cam in the 89 five liter. | 89StangGT | 5.0 Mustangs | 4 | August 22nd, 2006 01:17 AM |
