![]() | ![]() | |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing 03 Ram 1500 vs 07 GT in the Street Forum. Ok, so stock vs stock, there's no contest, but who would win between a ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
2007 Mustang GT
13.761@104.76
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 423
|
03 Ram 1500 vs 07 GT |
|
|
#2 | |
|
MM Picture Whore
2007 Mustang GT
282 rwhp/292 rwtq
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: I've got Rags in my bubble and I don't know what to do with it!
Posts: 13,874
|
It depends on what psi that blower is running at. If it's a typical street application running 8-10 psi, it will have added roughly 100 hp, perhaps a bit more depending on the chip & CAI.
Figure that for every 10 horse added, you gain approximately 1/10th second in the 1/4, so it's very possible that truck will smoke you now, provided he can get it to hook up.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Editor
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Willis,Texas
Posts: 1,624
|
Actually I think You'd Smoke Him
The 2004 Ford lightning only runs a 13.8 drag time And the dodge srt 10 pickup with 500 hp only runs a 13.6 And these are performance trucks Gears, tranny's, and tires
__________________
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Editor
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Willis,Texas
Posts: 1,624
|
unless He has a blown hemi You should smoke him
__________________
|
|
|
#5 |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 GT
Street Fast 16.9@76MPH
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,736
|
With a supercharger, he will add you to his kill list- especailly if you go from a roll.
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Regular
06 GT
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 237
|
Re: 03 Ram 1500 vs 07 GT
I think even with a supercharger you will still get him, especially on the top end.
__________________
In order to live, you must be willing to die. 06 Torch Red GT: pypes axleback, o/r H pipe. JLT bama 91 Race Tune, 4.10's 08 Ninja stock |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 GT
Street Fast 16.9@76MPH
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,736
|
The Dodge truck will run about a 15.6 stock. C'mon, we're talking about moving about 7400 lbs. here.
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 GT VERT PI at <3
Tell HMUSN he'll never catch me!!!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: "How does this thing work?"***BOOM***"Holy shit!!!, i just killed Zip!!!
Posts: 5,737
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
Editor
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Willis,Texas
Posts: 1,624
|
__________________
|
||
|
|
#10 | |
|
Editor
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Willis,Texas
Posts: 1,624
|
Re: 03 Ram 1500 vs 07 GT
__________________
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 GT VERT PI at <3
Tell HMUSN he'll never catch me!!!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: "How does this thing work?"***BOOM***"Holy shit!!!, i just killed Zip!!!
Posts: 5,737
|
|
|||
|
|
#12 |
|
Regular
2007 Mustang GT
13.761@104.76
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 423
|
I had made some preliminary half-hearted Google searches during my discussion with my friend about this and saw approximate RAM times of 14.8 and the GT at 13.6. Those were the numbers I ran with, though I think the RAM used in the test had the CAI and chip, minus the supercharger. This may account for the slightly faster time than the stocks? This whole discussion sprung from my friend stating that his truck could beat my stock GT. I generally laughed at it, and after a few searches and mentions of what mods he had on it, I realized it could actually be a close matchup and wanted to check with the more knowledgeable people here before "writing any checks my ass can't cash"
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
MM Picture Whore
2007 Mustang GT
282 rwhp/292 rwtq
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: I've got Rags in my bubble and I don't know what to do with it!
Posts: 13,874
|
If it's a shortbox 1500 with a Hemi, it most definitely could be a close race. The truck only weighs approximately 4800 lbs, depending how it's spec'd out. Drive it across a public scale if you don't believe me. I've been driving trucks for 20 years. I have been weighing things that go in trailers, on flatbeds, and in tankers for a living. I also buy & read most automotive mags, and usually have a good idea what most vehicles weigh. I have made one assumption here, since you didn't state what engine he's running AC, and that is that this truck has the 345 hp/375 lb-ft tq Hemi. I've read more than one review with the Hemi Ram running 15-ish second 1/4 mile times.
Here's a cool article on a comparo between the Hemi Ram & that Chevy Silverado SS pickup: Clickity I otherwise based my input here on your stating that prior to the S/C, the truck was 1 second slower than your car. If this is the case, which it very well could be, with his S/C, depending on the tune & the psi setting on that blower, it could be anywhere from a drivers race if it's conservatively tuned, to he hands you your hat if it's aggressively tuned. However if he's running a regular street radial, good luck getting that short box to hook up if he's added some serious power.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
MM Fanatic
2003 GT
Street Fast 16.9@76MPH
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,736
|
|
||
|
|
#15 | |
|
MM Picture Whore
2007 Mustang GT
282 rwhp/292 rwtq
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: I've got Rags in my bubble and I don't know what to do with it!
Posts: 13,874
|
Yeah the 4 door crew cab will be heavy. I'm assuming this guy is talking about a shortbox, though. I hope. lol
*waits patiently for response from Captain Crackers*
__________________
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular
2007 Mustang GT
13.761@104.76
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 423
|
Unfortunately I don't know much else about his truck, I've never raced or seen it. This was just a discussion we had while chatting one day and I was curious on opinions. The second difference comes from what I said in the above post, the times I had found online for both cars. I requested some pictures from him, which I'll through in here as soon as I get them.
|
|
|
#17 | |||
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 GT VERT PI at <3
Tell HMUSN he'll never catch me!!!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: "How does this thing work?"***BOOM***"Holy shit!!!, i just killed Zip!!!
Posts: 5,737
|
|
|||
|
|
#18 | ||||
|
MM Fanatic
2003 GT
Street Fast 16.9@76MPH
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 3,736
|
|
||||
|
|
#19 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
1993 5.ohhhh
14.47 at 96 mph
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Gatorland
Posts: 2,583
|
This 13.6 number keeps popping up, but it seems wrong. High 13's at best.
13.8 http://www.allpar.com/model/ram/ram-srt-10.html 13.8 http://www.dannieldridge.com/truck.html idk it might just be me. But I've seen them bow down to a few lightnings stock for stock.
__________________
99 towncar siezed motor 1996 v6 mustang 5 speed fed in the a by a bronco 1999 v6 auto drive way paper weight 1993 5.0 5 speed http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y51...thtrhtrhtr.jpg |
|
|
#20 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1996 GT VERT PI at <3
Tell HMUSN he'll never catch me!!!
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: "How does this thing work?"***BOOM***"Holy shit!!!, i just killed Zip!!!
Posts: 5,737
|
the sticker on the door represents the maximum payload the truck can handle.....(not tow)the weight of the truck is ussually 1000lbs less then that. Like if u look at the gross weight of a mustang it says 4400 but we all know the car weighs around 3300.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: 03 Ram 1500 vs 07 GT
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| $1500 To Spend | psycho bob | 2005+ | 9 | November 8th, 2007 06:27 PM |
| best to get with 1500 | mustang kid 1989 | V6 Mustangs | 8 | September 3rd, 2007 08:34 AM |
| 1500 Bucks To Spend | purplepony96 | 96-98 | 20 | November 12th, 2006 04:18 AM |
| 06 Ram 1500 | mcollins | All Other Vehicles | 3 | September 19th, 2006 10:00 AM |
| Car shaking below 1500 rpm | 90Stang | 5.0 Mustangs | 5 | August 25th, 2006 01:40 PM |