| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 gt
5.4 32v on the way
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 4,192
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Might get an svo
I am thinking about picking up an 84 svo and am curious what I should watch out for. I am looking for a different car to be my DD and I want something that will be decent on gas and not be real slow. How reliable are these cars and what kind of mpg do they get? I have seen someone claim as high as 38, how common is 30+mpg? And out of curiosity the one I might go look at says the car has a new t3 t4 turbo running at 17 psi, what kind of power can that make on the 2.3?
__________________
2003 Mustang gt - usual mods - slowly working on 5.4 swap 2004 srt4 - Stock DD/winter beater Click here for your tuning needs Before asking a gearing related question click THIS link and enjoy all your saved time. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Doc
1986 SVO
48.47@ 12.58
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 37,050
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 11 reviews
|
30 mpg is pretty common depending on your foot of course. The turbo oil feed lines tend to corrode a bit so that is something to watch out for. As far as the hybrid turbo.. that really depends.. does the car have any other mods? Mine dynoed stock at 190rwph @ 12 psi on a T-3. ( I was having issues with the waste gate and should have been at 15psi)
__________________
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
MM Fanatic
unstoppable @ speed of light
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Knees deep in dat ass
Posts: 3,104
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
30mpg isn't hard to hit if you drive easy.
__________________
Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular
1987 5.0 HO, 1984 SVO
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: arkansas
Posts: 87
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
My svo gets ab 18 mpg no matter how easy i drive it, but im also runnin a pos fmu. the car is ab as reliable as it gets if u ask me, fonsidering the age. As long as the car hasnt been ragged to hard and you odnt see any major problems, get it. The car is super simple to work on and relatively cheap. Oh, and its a blast to drive. Its not like the other foxs' out there. It feels like you drivin an overgrown go kart. And most of the 5.0s around cant touch one with the boost turned up
im a big fan
__________________
92' lx 2.3 bone stock dd trunk car 84 SVO with a few bolt ons 87 gt project with a whole bunch of shit thrown at it and a lil juice... |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Doc
1986 SVO
48.47@ 12.58
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 37,050
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 11 reviews
|
I hear ya on the go cart thing. These are very nimble cars.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Regular
1987 5.0 HO, 1984 SVO
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: arkansas
Posts: 87
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
HMU, what all have you done to yours? anything that made a big improvment that i dont have? looking into a FMIC but dont know if its worth the $
__________________
92' lx 2.3 bone stock dd trunk car 84 SVO with a few bolt ons 87 gt project with a whole bunch of shit thrown at it and a lil juice... |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Doc
1986 SVO
48.47@ 12.58
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 37,050
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 11 reviews
|
Basically, all this and a boost controller. That is about it for now.
__________________
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular
1987 5.0 HO, 1984 SVO
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: arkansas
Posts: 87
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
have you installed it yet? ive already got the 3" turbo back and boost controller
__________________
92' lx 2.3 bone stock dd trunk car 84 SVO with a few bolt ons 87 gt project with a whole bunch of shit thrown at it and a lil juice... |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
MM Fanatic
2003 gt
5.4 32v on the way
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Omaha
Posts: 4,192
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
Well the car sold before I could go look at it. Its ok though I think im going to look for a 2.3 ranger. I wouldnt mind a small truck, test drove a 4cyl ranger once and it just didnt have enough power to move around very well. I have quickly grown fond of the idea of a 2.3T ranger.
__________________
2003 Mustang gt - usual mods - slowly working on 5.4 swap 2004 srt4 - Stock DD/winter beater Click here for your tuning needs Before asking a gearing related question click THIS link and enjoy all your saved time. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Doc
1986 SVO
48.47@ 12.58
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 37,050
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 11 reviews
|
In the middle of it now honestly. I am doing the FMIC, and a few other things in the mix as well. Basic stuff. For now..
__________________
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
MM Fanatic
unstoppable @ speed of light
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Knees deep in dat ass
Posts: 3,104
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
a good FMIC is a great investment, with the cooler air charge you can run more boost without detonation. A high flow fuel pump will be great as well. That's about as far as basic can go for power improvements, other things like sub frame connectors, tubular k-member and a arms, light rims and drag radials... After that it's really good to get a way to tune the comp, or go for an aftermarket system.
__________________
Political correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical, liberal minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end. |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |