| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Discussing Twin Turbo 2.3? in the SVO Forum. As some may know, I planned to drop a 350 in a junk Mustang 2.3L ... Modded Mustangs is the premier Ford Mustang Forum on the internet. We discuss all aspects of the Ford Mustang on the forum. Registered Users do not see the above ads. Please Register - It's Free! |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Findlay, OH and Annapolis, MD
Posts: 122
|
Twin Turbo 2.3?
As some may know, I planned to drop a 350 in a junk Mustang 2.3L (N?A model). But it almost seems more economical to drop in the 2.3T motor from a donor car and not have eff around with so much stuff (just fuel pump and computer) but I still plan to switch over to the World Class T5 and 9" rear.
I'm not very turbo-savvy, so I was wondering what is involved in running a twin turbo system or if I would be better off just leaving it at a single turbo and tuning up a different part of the motor (or buying a new turbo but keeping it single)?
__________________
'04 Ranger XLT- black, 4.0L, 5-speed manual, 4x4 Chevy didn't share the bailout money, so I came to the blue side!
|
| Sponsored Links | Remove Advertisements |
| Forums at Modded Mustangs Advertisement |
|
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,956
|
it would be more efficient to use one large turbo over 2 small ones
but why do you need a 9" rear? that seems like a waste to me.. unless you plan on making a LOT of power |
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Findlay, OH and Annapolis, MD
Posts: 122
|
The car is going to get stripped and turned into a dragster. I'm shooting for about 300hp off the bat but then moving up to about 600hp over a couple years. I just figured it would be easier to install the entire drivetrain while I have the car ripped apart rather than using the original rear and the evantually have to replace it and knock the car out of commission for a while.
__________________
'04 Ranger XLT- black, 4.0L, 5-speed manual, 4x4 Chevy didn't share the bailout money, so I came to the blue side!
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2002 Ford Focus
slow as fuck
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: M-Pan, NJ
Posts: 2,562
|
you def wont need a 9" rear. youll need an 8.8" at the absolute most if your gonna do 600hp
__________________
99 V6 Mustang-sold 02 Ford Focus-sold 98 Camaro Z/28-lid, catback |
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned
1990 Mustang LX Turbo
9.71@141.6 mph
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 8,780
|
i know a guy who has a twin turbo 2.3 making 700hp
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Regular
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Findlay, OH and Annapolis, MD
Posts: 122
|
![]() Also, should I just keep the stock turbo until after I have beefed up the rest of the motor or should that be soon on my list to replace?
__________________
'04 Ranger XLT- black, 4.0L, 5-speed manual, 4x4 Chevy didn't share the bailout money, so I came to the blue side!
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: アメリカ
Posts: 5,956
|
i wud keep the turbo stock for now..
you can see significant power gains by increasing air flow.. such as port and polish and a good (tuned?) exhaust |
|
|
#8 |
|
Devil's Advocate
1990 GT 'vert
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 4,881
|
if big power is what you're after, a big single turbo is what you want. The "problem" with big singles is that they can take a while to spool-up, which sucks ass in street driving. But that's not a problem for you if you're making a drag car.
Twin turbos also aren't generally used on 4 cylnder engines, as you don't really have the enought exhuast flow from 2 cylinders to make a turbo worth it. The reason you go to a twin is to generate your boost at lower rpm, as it's easier/quicker to spool up two small turbos. If you were going to do some form of dual turbo setup, what you'd most likely want to do is a sequential turbo, much like the 3rd gen RX-7 or Ferrari F40, where there's a small turbo to help low end, and a big-ass turbo for the big power. I still don't think that you'd want that setup in a drag car though, as it's just extra heat and complexity.
__________________
Assume that whenever I'm talking tech that I'm not talking about going in straight lines, and my posts will make much more sense. O o /¯/______________________ |BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!! \_\ |
|
|
#9 |
|
Enthusiast
2000 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 986
|
twin turbos on a 4cyl isn't really logical..There isn't much beneift and the hotside would be a hassle.
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
1990 Mustang LX Turbo
9.71@141.6 mph
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 8,780
|
yea that guy with the TT DOHC 2.3 doesnt like how it runs with it
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: Twin Turbo 2.3?
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Turbo HorsePower Twin Turbo kit | dblindberg | 2005 - 2009 | 34 | June 17th, 2007 08:05 PM |
| Supercharger, Twin Turbo, and Single Turbo | justinsstang | Power Adders | 24 | March 7th, 2007 09:07 PM |
| Mellon's Twin Turbo Stealth vs Wills99z's Single Turbo z28 | Mellon | Videos | 10 | December 30th, 2006 10:05 AM |
| Turbo, Twin Turbo, Procharger, or Kennebell? | black94gt | 5.0 Mustangs | 19 | October 7th, 2006 10:41 AM |
| Super Charger vs Turbo/Twin Turbo: Pros and Cons of each | FireryDriver | 2005 - 2009 | 9 | September 17th, 2006 04:15 PM |