| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Newbie
2002 Mustang
unknown
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: bogota
Posts: 16
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Hp Help!
ok, so i'm about to start a huge v6 mustang project... and about to drop 7000g's into this thing once summer comes....
Can any one tell me if this all works... or any suggestions? 4.2l shortblock from rpm-mustangs Stage 3 SuperHeads with 1.94/1.56 stainless steel valves - from supersix SSM custom ground CompCams billet cam - from super six ported lower intake windstar intake Jmod 8.8' rear end... < any ideas where i can find one? and do the 05-08 gt fit? Loudmouth exhaust... custom cold air intake Demon Coils and Stang wires... (for looks) Any suggestions about a fuel system? do i need one? OK OK... Some peoplehave told me i will barely make 300hp... and others have told me i could come close to 400 with a good tune... any ideas? |
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
The George Forman of Keepers
|
Looks like one hell of a wish list.
IMO, start smaller man. Save for some simple bolt ons and enjoy it for what it is. If you are serious about having a race car (if thats your goal) ditch the 6 and put the 7k into a GT. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Newbie
2002 Mustang
unknown
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: bogota
Posts: 16
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I kno i was going to get that... =\ well thats definately a possibility... im just trying to see how much this v6 can handle im kind of curious
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The George Forman of Keepers
|
Sorry JD, Im not being a prick. I think we all wonder what they are capable of. Once you start really looking at the cost and energy it takes just to get it to stock GT values, I don't think its worth it. Don't get me wrong though, there are some guys here that have invested alot in the 6 and those cars are incredible. Someone will catch your thread and give you some good feedback. I try to be real with these cars. 300hp is obtainable for sure (I couldnt tell you if it is or not with your mod list) but these cars will produce that with some work and dedication...alot of work and dedication.
Just curious,,,, ever consider FI if you have 7k? Leave the 3.8 in there and add an SC and add ons. |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1999 Ford Mustang V6
14.79 @ 92.15
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: University of Georgia
Posts: 8,854
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
ModdedAutos 1999 Mustang V6 I used to list my mods here but stopped when I exceeded 255 characters.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 391
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I'd guess around 265rwhp. You won't be seeing 300 without FI.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Newbie
2002 Mustang
unknown
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: bogota
Posts: 16
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Any one else think its worth it?
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1999 Ford Mustang V6
14.79 @ 92.15
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: University of Georgia
Posts: 8,854
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
__________________
ModdedAutos 1999 Mustang V6 I used to list my mods here but stopped when I exceeded 255 characters.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I Post Entirely Way Too Much
1999 Ford Mustang V6
14.79 @ 92.15
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: University of Georgia
Posts: 8,854
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
I would invest in a poweradder (supercharger or turbocharger).
__________________
ModdedAutos 1999 Mustang V6 I used to list my mods here but stopped when I exceeded 255 characters.
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Enthusiast
|
once these engines are built we still have no idea what the limits are when R&D will be applied. 600+rwhp is an easy possibility with a built motor and a good turbo kit.
you won't be going anywhere without forced induction though. IMO do forced induction first then build the motor as you are able. stock internals are good til 350rwhp with a good tune and that is reachable with a turbo kit without to much trouble. v6 or GT you'll still need forced induction to really do much. find what goal you want, then see what you will need to do to reach it. if 300rwhp is your goal. through a turbo on the stock motor and be done with it.
__________________
436rwhp/378rwtq tuned by HPP www.hppmotorsports.com - www.stangcharger.com - www.rpm-mustangs.com |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Newbie
2002 Mustang
unknown
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: bogota
Posts: 16
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Any good Suggestions to reach 350hp?
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Newbie
2002 Mustang
unknown
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: bogota
Posts: 16
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
actually make that 425 lol
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
Chris's setup. (itschristorres)
Talk to him and he'll tell you exactly what you need. |
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Banned
|
well i see a few things wrong.
a.) why are you going to use an RPM bottom end and then SSMS top end? Not to sound rude but if you enjoy wasting money feel free. If you really want to SPEND $$ on heads i'd go CNC from RPM. much cheaper then stage 3 heads and flow extremely close the uppers and lowers i've heard/seen how SSMS ports... they are a great company but i could not believe the taper. For the cost of the parts on those intakes and the easy accessible ports why not FULLY port it correctly? CRT RACING PERFORMANCE | I do porting and polishing as well if your interested check out my products. I ran them on a 01 STOCK bottom end motor, ported heads(not race heads), ported upper and lower intake and a regrind camshaft from RPM and gained 71+rwhp at 6psi and 77rwhp from 9psi before h/c/i-279rwhp-6psi/////313rwhp-9psi after h/c/i-350rwhp-7psi//////390rwhp-9psi this is through a turbocharged setup keep in mind though. n/a you will probably not see AS GREAT of a gain but still i'd EASILY say 60+rwhp Next an 05+ rear end will not work with a car thats 04 or older assuming you have that model.. if you have a 99-04 v6 mustang you would preferably need a rear end from a 99-04 GT model(8.8) or a 98 and older 8.8 will work but its 3/4 of an inch short on each side NOTE an 8.8 is by NO means stronger then a 7.5 with a detriot trutrac...its actually WEAKER if you going to push 400+rwhp and hitting a track. the 8.8 will for sure need stronger axles and a posi/diff. unit for an n/a setup realistically your going to be looking at 260-280rwhp through that auto...an aluminum driveshaft will help you bring more power to the ground. why i say 260+ assuming if you are going to stay n/a a 10:1 compression ratio would be IDEAL. SSM's v6er hit 260rwhp and 260rwtq with a setup just as yours only with a C4tranny. that trany will rob a tad bit more power then yours thus making 260rwhp goal doable IMO i would NOT invest the $$ on a forged short block if your looking to run n/a. it'd be a waste of money because your stock bottom end will easily support any n/a setup a v6 mustang will offer. ifyou wish to do nitrous or supercharge or turbocharge the car then yes it'll be worth it
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Admanistrator
|
^
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
Like I said...listen to Chris.
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Banned
|
as someon said
if your an n/a guy...to be honest only way this car n/a will move great is in a light car and n/a done all out which means custom upper, every imaginable bolt on stick with a 7.5 rear for less weight to turn light wheels lots of weigh reduction high octane fuel high compression motor insane cam to be honest i think the highest hp numbers anyone will ever see is maybe a few hairs over 300hp...you'd be almost better off in a manual...weigh's less more power to the ground with k-member, a-arms, coil overs, lighter control arms, and weight reduction you can sit at 2800lbs maybe 2700-2750 with no a/c, manual sterring, no front sway bar n/a i bet i could hit 2700lbs but the car wouldnt be too streetable and would require race fuel and probably hit about 315rwhp with some Q16 in a t5 tranny and i would NEED nitrous because n/a would be boring in a 6cylinder 2700lbs with 315rwhp equates to 8.5lbs per whp...which is just about enough to run 11s thats a non-streetable car now when a V8 swap(NOT A 4.6) n/a like a 302 will mark down 300+rwhp with incredible ease and 87octane
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle Random ESG fact: Had a prochamber on his v6 before it was popular. WTB: v6 BBK valve covers |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
What do you call a car that terminates a termi?
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle Random ESG fact: Had a prochamber on his v6 before it was popular. WTB: v6 BBK valve covers |
|
|
|
#20 |
|
MM Fanatic
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,738
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 2 reviews
|
what? termi terminator?
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |