| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack (8) | Thread Tools |
|
|
#41 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
__________________
436rwhp/378rwtq tuned by HPP www.hppmotorsports.com - www.stangcharger.com - www.rpm-mustangs.com |
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#42 |
|
Regular
Looking right now
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: California
Posts: 296
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
man,after reading all this I kind of want to build me a little sixer. Big time sleeper. You guys probably PISS off alot of people. Don`t you......
__________________
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle |
|
|
|
|
#44 | ||
|
[8MINUS2]
|
Chris where are your updates.... Your slacking
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle |
||
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
and it should still be close on pump gas unless i hit another wall.
__________________
436rwhp/378rwtq tuned by HPP www.hppmotorsports.com - www.stangcharger.com - www.rpm-mustangs.com Last edited by stangcharger; February 16th, 2009 at 01:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
|
Regular
2004 Mustang V6 Vert.
328/419 @ 4000 rpms
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 476
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
lol
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
Wax on, Wax off
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |||||
|
Banned
|
I'am confused and unsure on your thoughts about compression and bore... I chose the compression ratio i picked because not having to pay $7+ a gallon for race fuel and stilll make 600+rwhp through a v6 mustang will blow the mind of anyone on the street. also I have a few certain goals for this car. one of which is to make a certain rwhp at 17-18psi ![]() Some of the future option have never been done on a v6 before. a FEW things actually. One of the biggest things for me is weight. I will aim for about 2800lbs or less before i plan on making and hitting my FINAL goal of the car which to be honest is not being #1 lol thats like my 2-3rd goal on the list. ![]()
Thursday i take the head to the machine shop and build my motor. hopefully by the time i get my first head on i can pick up the other head the same day. you know how i feel about your situation...that shop has screwed you. you shouldnt be having the problems that you are having. Good luck with w/e you choose
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|||||
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Banned
|
Btw for those that wana know the cars goals
1---11.6-12psi i wana hit 440+rwhp on pump gas...last time i did it on race gas with a conservative tune..and 100octane is barely race gas...that shouldnt be to hard. but i'd like to see the torque at 420-450rwtq range 2--10s on the turbo and fuel system that i have!--more suspension, tires and a 2step...+a rear end. 3---500+rwhp with no more then 14psi 4---600+rwhp on pump gas with out going over 17-18psi 5---beat Matt from Delk BLOperformance IN STREET FORM! on drag tires, with no more then 18psi on PUMP GAS!!! by beat,,,a 9.70 at 140mph is beating him 6---650+rwhp on pump(doubt it but we'll see) 7---680rwhp or 700rwhp i'll be very happy with 675+ 700 is not on my mind 8---8s---2700-2800lbs....slicks, nitrous, race fuel most likely....according to a calculator only 800CRANK hp is needed for 8.9 in other words CAKE by that time i highly assume i'll have an auto C4... figure 20% driveline loss 20% of 800hp=160hp loss=640rwhp at the ground needed. Why matt hasnt done it cause Delk and his sh!t sucks
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2003 V6 Mustang
Too long@Too slow
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 2,672
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
damn dude, thats one bad ass stang.
get it all together and go smoke some people who think v6 mustangs arent worth anything!
__________________
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
Banned
|
![]() lol thats already been done full bolt on ls1---walk in the park he ran 12.3s and trapped 115mph bolt on cobra ![]() My point already has been proven, I'am all over the street scene down here. a good amount of people know about the black v6...but the motor blew before i got famous which is good ![]() lol because when i line up with a 550rwhp GT500 and beat it then line up with a 350whp Lexus and beat it by only 1 car...they're wonder wtF? ![]() ![]() sandbagging ftw!
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Newbie
|
Ok, I'm back in this thread. I have built up quite a few emails while I've been slacking off in the forum world and working on other things like cleaning my garage and studying.
What I wanted to do is recommend things that of course you didn't need to consider trying personally, but at least you could consider them and tell me if it's possible. It seems someone else decided to come into the argument and put words in your mouth. Sorry if I got the wrong impression about you. I have no doubt that anyone pushing such numbers through any engine is in any way clueless about how to reach a certain goal. The thing is that I tried to have some discussion on different ways to go about getting to that goal for my personal gain so that I would know if it's possible. My thoughts on compression and bore are that by increasing your bore, you increase the surface area of the piston that compresses now more air. It's very well known that there's a slight, very slight increase in compression with an over-bore. You may over-bore and get to 8.501:1 compression, and so be it if it turns out that way. It was a small suggestion that turned into a big and confusing thing. Yes, I'm aware that I'm too late to make solid suggestions to change Chris' plans, but why would I want to change them? I started off and continued going in this thread by asking questions to see what Chris and others think. There's no way I would expect Chris to change what he wants to do, but I at least expect that people can tell me more about this engine in particular. Different strokes for different... blocks...
__________________
![]() 94 Bonneville - Turbo L67 & 6-speed manual project car 99 Bonneville - Tuned, aluminum UIM, ported LIM, bigger throttle body, no EGR, no evap, no cat, and a fender well intake I'm helping my friend mod his 2000 3.8 Mustang. It's fun. |
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Banned
|
before yes i did want a small then normal charger. i wanted a quick spool rather then mass power
but smaller turbo=more boost to reach your desired goal more boost=more heat which= less power so i got 2 negatives to 1 slight positive.... bigger turbo- more air more power less boost less boost less heat more power with out turning up boost which less boost=less problems nitrous=turbo lag killer 2step=lag killer bigger turbo= NO negative effects when helpers join the picture in other words if i got a 67mm turbo say i might need 15psi to make 540rwhp for an example... where with a 76mm or 78 i might need only 14psi to make 540rwhp some might say...ok chris its only 1psi... oh ya? well when you make 18-21rwhp per psi...1psi is a good helper. so now i can make 560rwhp with 15psi instead of 540rwhp this also helps out with long term goals....18psi pump gas-650rwhp rather then 20psi on a smaller turbo that'll max out
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
there is something very restrictive on my setup and i am very sure it is my intakes. I think a ton can be gained by the SSM. 50rwhp i wouldnt be shocked, hell ive blown the TB inlet off on the dyno. lol got bigger until it just blow off due to the pressure. we will see soon.
__________________
436rwhp/378rwtq tuned by HPP www.hppmotorsports.com - www.stangcharger.com - www.rpm-mustangs.com |
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
Stangcharger your fate lies in the hands of the SSX intake manifold .... or SSX & race gas. What intercooler are you using? It'll be nice to see a 500rwhp SAE-5 v6 mustang.
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle |
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
ya sae was 426rwhp. and i hope the hands of the SSM intake are nice. This is the first one of Tom's new guy making them.
__________________
436rwhp/378rwtq tuned by HPP www.hppmotorsports.com - www.stangcharger.com - www.rpm-mustangs.com |
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2003 V6 Mustang
Too long@Too slow
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 2,672
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
[8MINUS2]
|
Get rid of that get the eBay intercooler or a better one, I bet if you go that route you would make 500. What IAT are you seeing? Hell make a "stangchargers quest for 500" thread so we can get out of chris's thread.
__________________
![]() Hi, You can call me Kyle |
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
chris has my support. and i think he will hit his goal from what i see from him if not exceed.
__________________
436rwhp/378rwtq tuned by HPP www.hppmotorsports.com - www.stangcharger.com - www.rpm-mustangs.com |
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Banned
|
the motor will be put on hold
figures time i get a company order in a while is the only time that I need time for my car and since my new promotion at work time is VERY limited. So due to the order and demand i'am going to have to do the orders first then my car.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] Acmillr loves me |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.moddedmustangs.com/forums/v6-mustangs/108643-chriss-4-2-4-3l-v6-turbo-build.html
|
||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| TMA Turbo Race kit for sale | This thread | Refback | February 24th, 2011 10:33 PM | |
| TMA Turbo Race kit for sale | This thread | Refback | November 27th, 2010 10:17 PM | |
| TMA Turbo Race kit for sale - 3.8 Mustang Message Board | This thread | Refback | December 29th, 2009 07:48 PM | |
| TMA Turbo Race kit for sale - 3.8 Mustang Message Board | This thread | Refback | December 27th, 2009 10:28 PM | |
| TMA Turbo Race kit for sale - 3.8 Mustang Message Board | This thread | Refback | December 27th, 2009 10:17 PM | |
| TMA Turbo Race kit for sale - 3.8 Mustang Message Board | This thread | Refback | December 27th, 2009 10:16 PM | |
| fuel pumps, 60lbinjectors,boost-a-pump-ported heads & cam - 3.8 Mustang Message Board | This thread | Refback | September 9th, 2009 03:36 PM | |
| MySpace.com - External Link Alert | This thread | Refback | May 17th, 2009 05:26 PM | |
Threads Similar to: Chris's 4.2/4.3L V6 turbo build
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3.8 V6 Turbo build overview | TurboLX | General Tech | 20 | November 15th, 2011 02:45 PM |
| S.W. Customs V6 Turbo (build) | Eds32vM1 | V6 Mustangs | 88 | February 20th, 2010 06:14 PM |
| My turbo build | 98 cobra | 4V / SVT | 5 | June 16th, 2008 01:19 AM |
| Chris's V6 Turbo thread | itschristorres8 | V6 Mustangs | 78 | March 24th, 2008 08:26 PM |
| chris's turbo post is ruined. | 1LOUDGT | The Clubhouse | 90 | September 1st, 2007 08:13 PM |