[itschristorres8]

ivancanchola74 idk about
his mods i couldnt care for...if thats his car w.e good for him..lol
jeff is another person that hates me for God knows what..idk
the link to the previous thread is 1-2months old...theres no way im findin it lol

[AtlanticBlue99]

Originally Posted by Texan_Stud Originally Posted by AtlanticBlue99 I must have missed the beginning of the tension, but nobody has supplied a link to that either. I just want to probe some questions in and see how truthful he and ivancanchola74 are... it does seem far fetched but it wasnt worth all the drama.. and i saw their posts earlier they were going berserk over people calling out for more information.. ill find the old posts if i can

cool. i am not trying to prove anyone a liar, but those numbers are very high (especially for the low-reading mustang dyno), and i doubt i have 40+ rwhp left in my car for a tune... i have many more mods, and i read 30rwhp lower, and the tune alone won't make that difference.

ivancanchola74, well, he posted under a dynamic ip of another member here, so i would just like to see more posts to see if his ip is static or not...

[Texan_Stud]

Originally Posted by AtlanticBlue99 Originally Posted by Texan_Stud Originally Posted by AtlanticBlue99 I must have missed the beginning of the tension, but nobody has supplied a link to that either. I just want to probe some questions in and see how truthful he and ivancanchola74 are... it does seem far fetched but it wasnt worth all the drama.. and i saw their posts earlier they were going berserk over people calling out for more information.. ill find the old posts if i can cool. i am not trying to prove anyone a liar, but those numbers are very high (especially for the low-reading mustang dyno), and i doubt i have 40+ rwhp left in my car for a tune... i have many more mods, and i read 30rwhp lower, and the tune alone won't make that difference. ivancanchola74, well, he posted under a dynamic ip of another member here, so i would just like to see more posts to see if his ip is static or not...

personally i think 02pony is multiplying if you ask me

[Luvdmustang]

Originally Posted by itschristorres8 Originally Posted by AtlanticBlue99 I don't think members should bash another member for running on they dyno. 11 pages of insults is ridiculous. I wanted to see more of his setup, tuning, and a/f ratio (legitimate and relevant information to the thread), so we should respect the thread-starter by not bashing his thread. This is my opinion. I don't think we should run off any new members unless they spam the boards. no offense bro but hes mentioned his mod in the thread and set up and in another thread way befoe...maybe you missed them or w.e but he has a i believe less mods then you and puts out the those rw numbers...probably just a really good tune but yea the debate was originally that a stock v6 does not put out 196 rwhp and i think he said 220bhp.... i was sayin that a stock v6 doesnt put out those numbers stock then he mentioned outta no where starting an arguement by posting somethin like...my car puts down this and that which is the numbers in the video i guess saying that he'll smoke me and my car is ugly....everyone is intitled to their own opinion but i never said anytthin at first about my car being faster or anything about my car period... this was actually his fault in the beggining but of course after i let it carry out as usual .....i always will to because i was right and wat he said was no needed and wasnt correct and he wasnt making a point i will stay argue my point in the beggining was right and that every thread on this forum ever made against me is just a sad attempt that turns out bad for the the thread starter

yea, those guys were lookin for arguement, but as usual, we all ended it

[GotBoost232]

dude i just watched those videos...i woke up my father downstairs laughing so hard...lmao..."im the juggernaut biottcchhh"....people ahve top much free time

[Ninjawafers!]

hahaha yeah... i posted that one and the power rangers one the same poeple did in the multimedia section