| ![]() | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular
2004 Mustang v6 3.9
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 137
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
LT or SHORTYS????
Hey all well i still havent decided either to get the long tube ceramic headers or just the shorty ceramic headers i would like ur guys 2 cents in this matter...Does it really matter on which ones i get wats the diffrrence in power n sound?I u have a sound clip it would really help please post it here so i kno the difference n let me kno on ur set up much Aloha!
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Newbie
|
longtubes for NA motors, shorties for boosted motors
just a matter of how much torque you want to keep
__________________
3 Mustangs 1 Lincoln Hearse 1 Lincoln ragtop 1 mercury Sable Savior of the 4-eyed 'stang |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular
2003 mustang v6
232rwhp@7psi
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: jackson, MS
Posts: 244
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
generally what i would say is if you have the money for lt's buy them, unless there are special circumstances.
__________________
V0rTech'D
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Enthusiast
|
Longtubes no matter what. shorties would be a restriction under boost.
__________________
436rwhp/378rwtq tuned by HPP www.hppmotorsports.com - www.stangcharger.com - www.rpm-mustangs.com |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Newbie
|
long tubes are more restrictive in that sense
__________________
3 Mustangs 1 Lincoln Hearse 1 Lincoln ragtop 1 mercury Sable Savior of the 4-eyed 'stang Last edited by plstktnkr2; July 5th, 2009 at 11:13 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Zoolander
04 Cobra #2260/3768 1/820
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,578
Blog Entries: 1
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 5 reviews
|
Longtubes will generally be the better option for power. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Newbie
|
So in the upper RPM band you generate less scavenging effect, and this is good???
I know it's less critical on a V6 due to how the engine power-pulses occur,than on a V8
__________________
3 Mustangs 1 Lincoln Hearse 1 Lincoln ragtop 1 mercury Sable Savior of the 4-eyed 'stang |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Enthusiast
|
and also when you are on the throttle you are going to stay in the upper RPM range. carrying the torque into the upper RPM's is IMO wanted. Long tubes have better gains in the upper RPM's and almost no loss down low either. there is a reason why almost no one with a v6 mustang is sugguested on other forums to go shorties. they don't see much gain over stock exhaust manifolds.
__________________
436rwhp/378rwtq tuned by HPP www.hppmotorsports.com - www.stangcharger.com - www.rpm-mustangs.com |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 391
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Shorties are almost worthless on our cars. I don't see why anyone would choose shorties over long tubes. In summary: LTs >>> man love > shorties
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
long tubes without question.
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
The only reason some people go over the shorties is cuz of the price not to mentin that you will need a shorty midpipe...../ plus the installation it gets really pricey....
Yes longtube headers add more deep sound to the exhaust its proved so there's no need to bring some clips lol...
__________________
2003 Mach 1 Procharged 500rwhp club
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
01 True Blue v6
to slow to matter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,141
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
You don't necessarily have to buy a shorty midpipe. Get a hacksaw and cut right after you 2nd pair of cats (it's gunna suck ass, but I did it and it worked), install the headers, then have a shop connect the rest of your midpipe to the headers.
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Regular
2004 Mustang v6 3.9
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 137
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
Thanks for the advise so it seems that everyone is saying to go LT so i guess LT it is thanks guys MAHALO
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
MM's Official Lucifer
|
Good choice.
__________________
"Fast she goes...in the city of Overdose"
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 10
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
How does adding long tubes effect the sound of the car?
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
|
Cuz they're longer and have long turndowns..
__________________
2003 Mach 1 Procharged 500rwhp club
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Enthusiast
99 Cherokee sport/87 5.0
not tested
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: san antonio, tx
Posts: 987
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
long tubes ftw
__________________
[CENTER]"Not the victory but the action; Not the goal but the game; In the deed the glory," -Hartley Burr Alexander |
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 2,933
![]() ![]() iTrader: 1 reviews
|
ok so i have a question if ur installing lts and u just cut the midpipe out like one person said. do you those first cats out or leave them? And then how hard is it to just get the lts in place without a lift and bolted up?
__________________
![]() UDP, CAI, True Duals, LTs, 91 Tune from TT, 3.73 gears, Tlok,Windstar upper, GT TB, Ported lower, Comp 218/226 cam, FRPP C Springs, J&M LCA, Tokico Blue shocks and struts, and J&M Full Length Subframe Connectors |
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Regular
2001 Mustang V6
n/a
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Houston
Posts: 95
![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
LT's over shortys ANYDAY
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hardcore Enthusiast
2000 Mustang
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 1,685
![]() ![]() ![]() iTrader: 0 reviews
|
If you installing lts on your sixxer you will have to remove ALL of the cats
__________________
![]() Detailing Crew Member North Carolina Modded Mustangs #5 |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Threads Similar to: LT or SHORTYS????
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shortys | M L Struck | 96-98 | 4 | March 27th, 2009 06:27 PM |
| Gone with Shortys | andres0286 | 99-04 | 6 | April 1st, 2008 09:36 PM |
| what do shortys do for sound? | 07stanggt | 2005 - 2010 | 36 | January 15th, 2008 10:52 AM |
| Shortys Worth It? | MyGT | 99-04 | 6 | December 15th, 2007 08:48 PM |